Business owner of Nunya

Looking to see who's telling it all! And trying to sit people up for their own benefit! Everyone isn't always who they say they are! #info #listen

source https://copblaster.com/blast/25858/business-owner-of-nunya

Failed Assassination Attempt on U.S. District Judge Esther Salas

A failed assassination attempt on United States District Judge Esther Salas left her 20 year old son dead and her husband in critical condition. Not much is known about the gunman beyond the fact that he was disguised as a fake Federal Express deliveryman. The shooter has not been apprehended and has not released a manifesto as far as we know. Why did this happen? We have theories as to motive and facts as to how it was possible. We don't know why this shooter wanted to kill Judge Salas. Our theory is that he or someone employing him had their Constitutional rights violated by her at some point in the past and probably felt that they were being patriotic by eliminating a threat to the Constitutional rights of the people. Those tend to be the more honorable motives for removing government officials from office using such means, but again we don't know who the shooter is or why he really did this. He could have easily been a schizophrenic that thought she was a demon conspiring against him, a vindictive ex-con on a personal vendetta with no political motivations, or a white supremacist that just did not like seeing person of color sitting on the bench. We do not know. All we know is that the gunman missed his target miserably, shot people that did not deserve to be shot, and killed someone. Whatever his motives, he has discredited himself with this epic fail. Who goes to all the trouble to arm up, get a disguise, go the the target location, and leave the target untouched in the basement? When we advocate that people protest the actions of government officials, including judges, we always ask that they leave their families alone should they choose to protests at their homes. Shooting their family members is not a protest and not something that we would ever support for any reason. We would support someone dressing up as a delivery man to deliver a piece of their mind, but that is it. We support knocking on their doors and saying what you think, but we do not support hurting anyone. How could this have happened? It happened because people working for the U.S. Marshals Office of Protective Intelligence (OPI) are incompetent. The OPI is in charge of judicial security and they fail to keep home addresses of federal judges out of public records. We were able to obtain Judge Salas' home address just a few minutes ago by typing her name into an online background check service that we subscribe to. Had the OPI done their jobs we would not be able to do that. There are ways to keep that information away from people like this shooter. Have the judge purchase property through a trust so that it is not in their name and use a P.O. box for all mail. Then have someone at OPI periodically check public records sites for personal information belonging to court staff. That would probably keep people like this shooter from finding their targets. We speak from personal experience. This author once sent a letter to the home of U.S. District Judge Marco Hernandez from jail asking him to recuse himself from his case and it worked. How easy it was to find his address was shocking and Judge Salas' address is just as easy to find. That is why when we dox law enforcement personnel we point out that any psycho that really wants to hurt them can and will do it anyway without our help. Our limited doxxing is intended to support peaceful protesters looking for places to make their voices heard. Doing that does not make it more likely for someone to harm the person being doxxed because they are being doxxed by public records sites anyway and their enemies know that. We just identify people involved with evil deeds and make it easier for everyday people to find those evil doers as long as we think their intentions are most likely peaceful. That is why our doxxing is usually just temporary while people are holding demonstrations to protest their behavior. We are not displaying Judge Salas' home address with this article because we are not aware of her perpetrating evil acts and we are not aware of any people that are peacefully protesting anything she has done. Finally, we ask that you take our word for it when we say that people looking for her don't even have to pay to find her information. When we Google'd her address and name together there were a whole bunch of public records sites listing her name with her address for free.#esthersalas #usmarshals #officeofprotectiveintelligence

source https://copblaster.com/blast/25857/failed-assassination-attempt-on-u-s-district-judge-esther-salas

Chris David: Tough as Nails Navy Vet Assaulted by Feds in Portland

Chris David of Portland, Oregon says he is "not made of steel" but you wouldn't be able to tell that from watching the video shot by Portland Tribune reporter Zane Spalding last night (embedded below). In the video you can see David standing in frot of the Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse when he was attacked by federal officers with batons. The batons did not phase him at all and they had to spray him in the face with mace just to make him turn around. David said that he had gone their to ask those same federal officers questions about their oaths. David himself took the same oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic. It is the same oath sworn by all members of the armed forces and federal law enforcement. David took the oath many years ago when he was commissioned to serve as an officer in the U.S. Navy. The photo above includes an old picture of the now 53 year old David taken when he was a Naval Lieutenant. For those of you that don't already know, police batons hurt. They are well known for shattering bones and typically just one strike is all it takes to bring the toughest of men to their knees. Was Chad David on something? Just blood thinners according to him, but he also says he has a lot of long term physical damage from his time in the military, so he could be on all sorts of pain killers for all we known. Still, even if he were high as a kite on OxyContin that still would not explain his tolerance for pain. A lot of protesters show up high on opioids only to flee in tears the second they are hit with a pepper ball. Chris David's pain tolerance must come from something else. We think he may have been hit with batons or worse in the past and went in there expecting the pain, only to be shocked by the mace. Whatever his reasons, Chris David is one tough dude that unlike his attackers, actually showed up to honor his oath.#chrisdavid #navy #homelandsecurity #borderpatrol #usmarshals

source https://copblaster.com/blast/25856/chris-david-tough-as-nails-navy-vet-assaulted-by-feds-in-portland

Federal Officer Assaults Portland Protesters with Laser Sight

Federal officers began assaulting protesters with red laser sights tonight in Portland, Oregon. These assaults are far more threatening than the conduct for which multiple protesters are facing assault charges in federal court. According to the feds, it constitutes assault to shine a laser pointer on a federal officer. That is because some high powered laser pointers can cause serious eye damage, so pointing a laser creates a reasonable apprehension of bodily harm on the part of the person that it is pointed at, especially if that person knows about the dangers of the lasers like any police officer probably would. Therefore if a cop knowingly does the same thing to a citizen they are just as guilty. In addition, a citizen has a more valid claim of apprehension due to the fact that the officers are using red dot laser sights attached to weapons. Any reasonable person that notices a camouflage wearing heavily armed federal officer painting them with a laser sight would fear for their lives. They would be afraid that the next thing that hits them will be a bullet. That constitutes simple assault under 18 U.S.C. 113(a)(5) (https://ift.tt/2is1PWH). The 9th Circuit defined simple assault in United States v. Chapman (https://ift.tt/2DirmPh) holding: "To constitute an assault, an action must be either a willful attempt to inflict injury upon the person of another, or a threat to inflict injury upon the person of another which, when coupled with an apparent present ability, causes a reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm. United States v. Dupree, 544 F.2d 1050, 1051 (9th Cir.1976)" This streamer, who calls herself Black Zebra Productions (https://ift.tt/3jilCW6) was just assaulted with a laser sight by a federal officer "acting within the scope of his office or employment" under Millbrook v. United States (https://ift.tt/3fOwPvK) and therefore the United States should be liable for his actions under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The FTCA waives sovereign immunity when law enforcement officers employed by the federal government intentionally assault someone.#usmarshals #homelandsecurity #borderpatrol #assault

source https://copblaster.com/blast/25855/federal-officer-assaults-portland-protesters-with-laser-sight

Memo Shows Officers Deployed to Portland Lack Crowd Control Training

When Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf came to Portland, Oregon on Thursday an internal DHS memo was waiting for him. That memo clearly states that the DHS personnel recently deployed to Portland for the primary purpose of crowd control are not trained in crowd control. The relevant portion of the memo reads: "The highly skilled tactical teams assigned to support the civil unrest and riots do not specifically have training in riot control or mass demonstrations. Moving forward, if this type of response is going to be the norm, specialized training and standardized equipment should be deployed to responding agencies." - Department of Homeland Security The author of the memo remains unknown to us because the copy we have was not signed. It just said "Name, Title (Component Deputy Chief or higher)" which leads us to believe that the leaked document was a draft. We were not even sure if it was real until reading about it in the mainstream news today. The thought of DHS deploying officers untrained in crowd control is both unconscionable and tragically unsurprising. Typical of the Trump Administration, they deploy people that are not competent to deal with a situation that the President himself is not competent to handle. Does this lack of training open the door to new legal options? If a state agency were to deploy untrained personnel and that action caused injuries, such failure to train would be grounds for deliberate indifference under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (deprivation of civil rights under color of state law). According to the Supreme Court "a municipality's failure to train its employees in a relevant respect must amount to deliberate indifference to the rights of persons with whom the untrained employees come into contact. Only then can such a shortcoming be properly thought of as a city policy or custom that is actionable under 1983" (https://ift.tt/30r2k8l). Deliberate indifference was defined by the Supreme Court in Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994) (https://ift.tt/3hjdWBn (b) Deliberate indifference entails something more than negligence, but is satisfied by something less than acts or omissions for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will result. Thus, it is the equivalent of acting recklessly. However, this does not establish the level of culpability deliberate indifference entails, for the term recklessness is not self-defining, and can take subjective or objective forms. Pp.835-837. (c) Subjective recklessness, as used in the criminal law, is the appropriate test for "deliberate indifference." Permitting a finding of recklessness only when a person has disregarded a risk of harm of which he was aware is a familiar and workable standard that is consistent with the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause as interpreted in this Court's cases. The Eighth Amendment outlaws cruel and unusual "punishments," not "conditions," and the failure to alleviate a significant risk that an official should have perceived but did not, while no cause for commendation, cannot be condemned as the infliction of punishment under the Court's cases. Petitioner's invitation to adopt a purely objective test for determining liability-whether the risk is known or should have been known-is rejected. This Court's cases "mandate inquiry into a prison official's state of mind," id., at 299, and it is no accident that the Court has repeatedly said that the Eighth Amendment has a "subjective component." Pp.837-840. (d) The subjective test does not permit liability to be premised on obviousness or constructive notice. Canton v. Harris, 489 U. S. 378, distinguished. However, this does not mean that prison officials will be free to ignore obvious dangers to inmates. Whether an official had the requisite knowledge is a question of fact subject to demonstration in the usual ways, and a factfinder may conclude that the official knew of a substantial risk from the very fact that it was obvious. Nor may an official escape liability by showing that he knew of the risk but did not think that the complainant was especially likely to be assaulted by the prisoner who committed the act. It does not matter whether the risk came from a particular source or whether a prisoner faced the risk for reasons personal to him or because all prisoners in his situation faced the risk. But prison officials may not be held liable if they prove that they were unaware of even an obvious risk or if they responded reasonably to a known risk, even if the harm ultimately was not averted. Pp.840-845. ---End-of-Citation--- If the federal officers deployed to Portland were sent by an agency that should have known that sending untrained officers would result in injury then that agency would be liable under Section 1983. Unfortunately, Section 1983 does not apply to federal officers. To challenge their actions one must file suite against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) or the individual officers under Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (https://ift.tt/2WyF1bL). To sue the United States one must prove that their officers acted within the scope of 28 U.S. Code 2680(h) which waives sovereign immunity in cases involving "assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process, or malicious prosecution." So, if one can prove that a federal officer assaulted, battered, falsely imprisoned, falsely arrested, abuse the legal process, or maliciously prosecuted someone the United States can be held liable. Unfortunately, one must also prove that federal officers were "acting within the scope of his office or employment." See Millbrook v. United States (2013) (https://ift.tt/3fOwPvK). The good news for plaintiffs in Oregon is that the federal officers deployed to Portland are clearly operating within the scope of their employment and high ranking officials are aware of it. Unfortunately, failure to train or deploying untrained personnel are not actions that the United States has waived sovereign immunity for, so to hold the United States liable for using excessive force they must prove that the conduct constitutes an assault or a battery. Excessive force by itself including violations of Constitutional rights are not cognizable under the FTCA. When a federal officer violates the Constitution they are considered to be acting in their individual capacity because violating the Constitution is not considered to be within the scope of their duties, so the United States is immune because sovereign immunity has not been waived. The only remedy is to sue the officers responsible in their individual capacities under Bivens. This author speaks from personal experience as the plaintiff in a FTCA claim against the United States for batteries inflicted upon his person by federal correctional officers at the United States Penitentiary in Victorville, California. That suit also includes a parallel Bivens suit against the individual officers for violating his Eighth Amendment right to cruel and unusual punishment.#homelandsecurity #chadwolf #borderpatrol #usmarshals #assault

source https://copblaster.com/blast/25854/memo-shows-officers-deployed-to-portland-lack-crowd-control-training

Portland Police Run Away from Naked Woman Protester

Last night the Portland Police were sent into a full retreat after encountering something they obviously had never seen before. A naked woman with her legs spread apart. We are still looking for a version of this video to embed on this page that is safe for work, so if you want to see the whole thing please visit our YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KIKgR1OFSY and if you want to see a version with the nudity censored check back here later. Needless to say the entire episode is one of the funniest things we have seen at any of these protests and the icing on the cake is the retreat. The episode began when federal law enforcement personnel in military uniforms had pushed protesters a couple blocks north of the federal courthouse using a barrage of teargas, pepper balls, and other "less lethal" munitions such as flash bangs. This led to a standoff at the corner of SW 3rd Ave. and Taylor Street. At that point a woman appeared wearing nothing but a mask. She approached the police line until federal officers started shooting pepper balls at her feet, a man with a shield moved in to protect her, and she retreated across the street but held her ground. At one point the feds retreated and were replaced by the Portland Police. That was when she approached the line again and engaged in a variety of poses including the above pictured pose (source: https://twitter.com/DonovanFarley/status/1284411412672999425/photo/1). While she held that post the police suddenly ran away. That brave woman single handedly made the police show their true colors and those colors ran. They are clearly a bunch of pussies scared of pussy. #antifa #assault #homelandsecurity #borderpatrol

source https://copblaster.com/blast/25853/portland-police-run-away-from-naked-woman-protester

I have seen and heard this broad call the cops on multiple people.

This broad had said out loud to a shit load of people that she will call the cops on someone if they piss her off. In fact, her kids dad is sitting in prisn on some bullshit rape charge that she admitted she made up. Why? Because she wanted his car.#copcaller

source https://copblaster.com/blast/25852/i-have-seen-and-heard-this-broad-call-the-cops-on-multiple-people