The road to perdition is paved with good intentions. Today most states have new laws on the books inspired in part by the relentless stalking of Hunter Moore by Charlotte Laws according to Netflix. Laws had a motive that anyone could relate to. A nude photo of her daughter had been posted on Moore's long defunct website IsAnyoneUp.com which now re-directs to an anti-bullying website. Laws became obsessed over Moore, tracked down everything she could find about him, and sent it to the FBI. Eventually Moore went to prison and was banned from social media. A slew of anti-revenge porn laws followed, at least one of them appears unconstitutional and another has been declared unconstitutional. This author first became aware of Moore in 2012 shortly after appearing on Anderson Cooper's syndicated daytime talk show. Anderson treated me rather rudely and I was interested in learning more about him. Other than knowing his name from CNN, I really didn't know much about him. I didn't know that he had a daytime talk show until his producer contacted me, I didn't realize how short of a douche he is until meeting him on stage, and didn't find out about his flaming homosexuality until researching him after the show. While researching Anderson, I stumbled upon three other similar episodes targeting different websites (Is Anyone Up, The Dirty, and Cheaterville). Each show was basically the same. Anderson brought women on to confront men that ran the sites as if they were victims of some kind. Anderson would call the site operator a "waste of breathe" or something similar. Then they would edit it to make the site operator look as bad as possible. That last one was necessary to mitigate the public backlash over all the free advertising the sites received. All the alleged victims seemed to have in common was their lives being so good that the worst things they were worried about were internet posts. Like Moore, I was targeted by a stalker, went to prison, and was banned from the web for awhile, but I fought my ban until it was declared unconstitutional. The difference in my case was that I sniffed out my stalker, counter-stalked her, threatened to kill her, and threatened to use my websites against the police. I felt justified and still do because she swatted my mother, the government illegally leaked her the only information that could have given her any leverage at all, and they clearly knew they were working with a provocateur. Swatting upped the ante from her just posting information unlawfully disclosed by the county (SSN, cell number, etc. from a medical intake form at the jail) to actually trying to physically hurt people or at least recklessly risking their safety. People have died from swatting (https://ift.tt/NuEGQsv). At that point, I knew I could probably dodge any sort of state coercion charge simply by proving that her course of conduct towards my family and I included criminal activity. Unfortunately, the government in my area embraces victimhood culture just as bad as any bleeding heart liberal can be expected to. In their eyes, she was the victim because she claimed emotional distress as a result of my refusal to remove something her ex-boyfriend had posted. Some people think that whenever anything you do or don't do makes somebody upset enough to call the police that you're automatically in the wrong. The presentence report writer even called her swatting of my mother's home "reasonable under the circumstances" as part of what I call systematic victim whitewashing. Ever since that happened to me I take a personal offense to people like Charlotte Laws. People that dedicate their time to giving cops incriminating information about other people are just as bad as cops themselves because without them there would be no crime tips. Laws is not satisfied with just taking down Moore. She loves the spotlight and has been in it for decades. She has since used her fame to advocate against free speech by seeking new laws against posting lawfully obtained images of adults without their permission. That means that if someone you are dating sends you a nude and you feel like posting it later for the purpose of criticizing that person, they can have you arrested for your criticism just because you included a nude. Personally, I am not a fan of revenge porn. I have never intentionally hosted it or posted any myself. I think that including a nude with a critical article subtracts from merits of the criticism. If your ex was unfair to you, posting your story should be enough to give them the public shaming you desire. Posting a nude makes you look heavy handed. I've traditionally focused more on building platforms for people to vent about almost anything that bothers them. I've never run an adult website. Despite having no desire to enter the revenge porn industry, I have noticed troubling language in at least one revenge porn statute which the legislature in my state is already trying to apply to other types of content. Most of it came to my attention last year after I submitted written testimony to the Oregon Senate Senate Committee on Judiciary and Measure 110 Implementation in opposition to HB 3047 commonly known as the anti-doxxing bill. I was contacted by a man claiming to have been wrongfully convicted under Oregon's revenge porn law. He pointed out similarities between both laws which I believe violate the First Amendment. Oregon Revised Statute 163.472 (https://ift.tt/NY3Ilw7) generally prohibits posting nude images with "the intent to harass, humiliate or injure another person," unless the post serves "a lawful public interest." I don't have a problem with the parts prohibiting intent to harass or injure, but "humiliate" is problematic because everyone has a First Amendment right to intentionally humiliate other people in public with their speech. Hunter Moore has the right to stand in a public square and give a speech naming women as well as what he thinks of them even if he thinks they're all whores. The law on that seems settled, but new laws say that he will go to jail if he holds up nude photos of the women to support his claims. That is where the law crosses the line. Oregon passed an anti-doxxing bill last year using language lifted directly from the revenge porn statute (https://ift.tt/OsIbCqR). They obviously believed that since it worked for the revenge porn law that it would work for restricting the publication of home addresses, personal phone numbers, and personal email addresses "with the intent to harass, humiliate or injure the plaintiff" (see original bill as introduced at https://ift.tt/t5fkMpd). However, the word "humiliate" was eventually stricken from the bill (see final bill as adopted https://ift.tt/3aSiV1k). Could it be the legislature realized they couldn't legally impose a content based restriction on speech intended to humiliate? I think the word "humiliate" needs to be stricken from ORS 163.472 in order to make it legal and all prior convictions need to be overturned. They should also strike the female nipple from the definition of intimate parts or add the male nipple to avoid gender discrimination. Men have boobs too and getting photographed topless can be humiliating (https://ift.tt/gNY741O). There are also way more transexuals around than there used to be. If someone posts a topless photo of someone they think looks like a woman, but was born a man are they in the clear? A federal judge already declared a similar Arizona statue too vague to legally enforce a few years ago (https://ift.tt/dkycLvD). In that case, publishers were afraid to distribute a book in Arizona because it contained nude images of battlefield detainees taken by American soldiers for the purpose of humiliating the prisoners. The state has since amended the law to specify "with intent to harm" but does not appear to specify what constitutes harm. The problem with this law is that while it seems to have a noble purpose, it opens the door to other forms of speech suppression. This is not a feasible road for a society to go down if it wants to be a democracy because it leads to the suppression of any speech intended to cause harm of any sort. In the future, under the laws of Laws, it could become a crime to post anything online with intent of harming the reputation of another for any reason whatsoever. America would be American no longer. To be clear, I do not want anyone to post naked pictures of anyone on the internet without their consent for any reason. I have always removed nudes as soon as I've seen them because I do not aspire to be a revenge porn guy. I am a defender of the First Amendment because it is the most important right we have. If we can't speak our minds no matter how vitriolic our thoughts we might as well be Chinese. The government always picks the most offensive examples of people exercising their rights to justify taking them away. They use stuff like school shootings to take your guns away and a bucket brigade of hot babes balling their eyes out over boobie pictures to take your voice away. I am not here because I want people to be like Hunter Moore. I am here because no matter how distasteful I consider Hunter Moore's conduct to be, being free from the publication of nudies is not a constitutional right. Therefore, whenever something that is not a constitutional right conflicts with a constitutional right, the constitutional right takes precedent no matter how unpopular the result might be. People like Charlotte Laws often get tunnel vision. They want what they want and don't care how they get it. While deterring revenge porn is generally a good idea, it is not more important than upholding the constitution. Wait, wasn't Hunter Moore convicted of hacking and identity theft, not revenge porn? Yes, that is true and he was in fact guilty. There is no debating that. However, Laws simply got lucky that Moore was so stupid. Moore was receiving so many submissions that he didn't need hacked material. When a hacker offers to sell stolen pictures, a smart man tells him the same thing he would tell a man that offers to sell him a van full of fertilizer, "no thanks officer." However, he would never had been caught if it were not for an obsessed snitch gathering information about him and forwarding anything potentially incriminating the the FBI. She reminds me of the gang stalkers I've heard about from local gang members. People that follow gang members around in public, take pictures/video, and call the police. She intentionally got someone kidnapped by the government, shipped to Texas, and held against his will for years. He never did anything that bad to anybody. Coincidentally, at the time of my arrest in 2012, I had just signed a contract with the same arbitration company used by another participant in the show to handle disputes between users. The arbitration service was called Truth in Posting (TIP). Most of TIP's business appeared to come from Cheaterville.com which now redirects to the personal website of Bullyville founder James McGibney. McGibney is best known for Cheaterville, but has since re-invented himself as an anti-bullying activist. I suspect Bullyville of being McGibney's exit strategy. As an Iraq veteran, McGibney knows all too well what can happen when you don't have an exit strategy. I could see someone in his position decide to re-invent himself as an anti-bullying activist in the even that his website, which faced more accusations of bullying than any of mine, became untenable. Rather than look like the failed inventor of the original cheaters website, it would make sense to launch a site like Bullyville, say it was due to being sick of people being bullied on your platforms, and spend a few thousand bucks to legitimize yourself by purchasing Moore's domain. McGibney seems like someone whose probably read the 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene (https://amzn.to/3JhpJzg) because he seems to be following the chapter about re-inventing yourself. You wouldn't know about McGibney's history if you'd just watched The Most Hated Man on the Internet because the interviewer seems to have given him a total pass. A good interviewer would have questioned him about Cheaterville. I've done interviews with countless journalists over the years including a documentary filmmaker and I've never gotten a pass like that. Leaving out the fact that McGibney was an early pioneer in the gripe site industry does not result in an accurate picture. Finally, I personally know what it is like to have humiliating information posted online. The government made several mugshots available which the media copied. One of them is the result of not shaving for days before putting gel in my hair and being forced to wear my hat during transport to another facility. I looked like a crazy hobo. It might not be a nude, but from what I've seen of Laws' daughter, she looks like someone with far less to be ashamed of naked than I do clothed. I also know what it is like to be the victim of vicious lies. Just a few years ago, I was denied pre-trial release because a tweaker falsely accused me of offering him a bunch of money I did not have to kill people involved in my case. Despite these things, I still support the First Amendment and I do not blame online platforms for how people use them. #charlottelaws #huntermoore #famoussnitchessource https://copblaster.com/blast/48862/charlotte-laws-mother-of-problematic-revenge-porn-laws
WRONGFUL ARRESTS DETAILS: On April 26, 2019, I was wrongly arrested by Nelson County KY, Sheriff's Deputy Aaron McCubbin for a DUI in Nelson County. He is now a Nelson County Police officer. At the DUI suppression hearing on January 9, 2020, I testified that I wore black, high heel shoes the night I was arrested which made it difficult for me to perform the field sobriety tests, and I brought the shoes to court as evidence. However, Deputy McCubbin initially testified that he did not remember what shoes I had on the night of my arrest. From watching the videos of 2 hearings, January 9, 2020, and February 25, 2020, I counted that Deputy McCubbin perjured himself at least 9 times regarding the shoes I was wearing the night of my arrest, meaning he made at least 9 conflicting statements. Deputy McCubbin not only LIED numerous times about the shoes I was wearing, but he also perjured at least 6 times about the position of the cars the night of my DUI arrest, meaning he made at least 6 conflicting statements. Additionally, he perjured himself at least 17 times about the 3 breathalyzer tests or 3 PBTs that he gave me on the side of the road, meaning he made at least 17 conflicting statements. I have proof of these accusations from 2 videos of these hearings, and I detailed all of Deputy McCubbin's LIES in 2 separate documents. After the January 9, 2020, DUI hearing, Deputy McCubbin requested the jail log from my DUI arrest, and it stated that I had on purple and gray shoes, not black as I had testified. However, the jail log did not state what type of shoe I was wearing. Regardless, this is untrue because the jail log contained several errors, besides the color of my shoes, including my date of birth and weight. Based on this jail log and Deputy McCubbin's memory, he initiated a complaint warrant for my arrest for felony perjury with help from the assistant, county attorney Paula Pace and approved by Judge Kelley. The perjury arrest warrant NEVER should have been issued by the assistant, county attorney and approved by Judge Kelley with the apparent errors in the jail log, and the fact that Deputy McCubbin perjured himself too many times to count. This is a perfect example of abuse of police and judicial powers. On January 21, 2020, four, Nelson County Sheriffs Deputies including Deputy McCubbin, came to my house at about 9:30 pm when I was in bed and wrongly, arrested for felony perjury. According to the warrant, Deputy McCubbin REMEMBERED that I did not have said shoes on and then he checked the jail jog for proof. Deputy McCubbin perjured himself too many times to court at the suppression hearing for the DUI charge and again at probable cause hearing for the felony perjury charge, yet I was the one who was arrested for felony perjury. After watching these 2 videos, it was evident that Deputy McCubbin did not have probable cause to pull me over for speeding or arrest me for the DUI or for felony perjury. Despite all of this, Deputy McCubbin was able to persuade Judge John Kelley to approve an arrest warrant and to rule in his favor at these 2 hearings. Where is the justice in that? Moreover, I was bullied into taking the DUI plea deal under the Alford Plea because of the fear of being arrested a 2nd time for felony perjury, the threat of having to spend an unknown amount of time in the horrific, Nelson County jail and possibly go to prison. Therefore, I was not in my right frame of mind when I accepted this plea deal due to everything that was on the line. Additionally, I wanted to testify at the probable cause hearing for the felony, perjury charge, but I didn't because, once more, of everything that was on the line. According to my attorney, the assistant, county attorney could have had the 2nd arrest warrant for felony perjury at the probable cause hearing ready to go, and I could have been arrested at the courthouse, that same day, if I testified, again, about the high heels I was wearing. So, I was bullied a 2nd time by Deputy McCubbin, assistant, county attorney Paula Pace and Judge John Kelley to not testify on my own behalf which is a violation of my constitutional rights. On March 18, 2020, the grand jury issued a no true bill for the perjury charge. However, I will have the wrongful, DUI charge on my criminal record for 10 years. Furthermore, the assistant county attorney Paula Pace, Judge John Kelley and Deputy McCubbin forced me into taking a plea deal for a charge when I was innocent and denied me the right to testify on my own behalf. Plus, I was taken to the deplorable, Nelson County jail twice and wrongly arrested in my own home. Deputy McCubbin DID NOT simply have a lapse of memory, at these 2 hearings, because he perjured himself to many times to count. After watching the 2 videos, it was evident that Deputy McCubbin was out to get me, and he was going to do whatever it took to make the DUI and felony perjury charges stick. It is clear to see, that he knowingly perjured himself numerous times in court with malicious intent to try to ruin my life because he didn't care what affect these 2 charges or convictions would have on my life, and he didn't care that I was innocent. However, this ordeal goes beyond Deputy McCubbin considering the assistant county attorney Paula Pace and Judge John Kelley did not try to seek justice in either case but instead decided to back a LYING Deputy who was trying to ruin my life. Therefore, they are just as guilty as he is!!! This abuse of police and judicial power has turned my life upside down by ruining my reputation, causing emotional distress, loss of income, which has affected my livelihood. #dirtycop ##corruptcop ##bardstownky#police#innocent#cop#bourbon
Click link "more info" for documents. Jennifer May works with the police as an informant for drug investigations. The paperwork speaks for itself. It's right there in black and white. If she tries to make an excuse , there are none. No it's not an error , that's why it's been sealed on clerknet Sarasota website. She is a liar, manipulator , a snitch and worst of all a absent dead beat mom. She's not to be trusted , she has no loyalty , only to herself . Not even her own kids. BEWARE. do not do any business of any kind with her or you'll be sorry . The truth , The end #sarasotajennifermay
Deputy Mayo, nicknamed the Testiliar by DEA agents with him on the task force. When DEA agents think your an unethical liar, you are some dirt bag. Mayo is a K9 unit in the Lancaster County Sheriff's Dept. In Nebraska. He specializes in pretense stops, dog alert reasonable cause searches and as likely as not if he finds drugs or cash just takes it impound your car and all contents and sends you walking. If your car is worth over $2k kiss it goodbye you'll never see it again. If you insist it will disappear out of impound and you will be told seized by federal agency. #corruptcop #seizure #forfeitureliar
This woman called and lied to the police. She went out of her way to make a False police report and manufactured all sorts of lies. She thinks she is some sort of community leader when in fact she is a lying scheming troll who enjoys ruining peoples lives. #susangaylediamond #serpentskiss #susandiamond #santacruz
Dr. Michael Seale seems to think that the courts and not the county are to blame for inadequate healthcare whenever inmates are taken to court instead of pre-scheduled outside medical appointments. His comments come in response to accusations that Multnomah County provides inmates with inadequate medical care whenever an outside medical appointment conflicts with a scheduled court appearance. In such cases, the inmate is taken to court and the medical appointment is rescheduled. This can happen over and over again for weeks as it did in this case. "At the time of appointment scheduling, conflicts such as court proceedings are often not known. In this case, Corrections Health made appointments with OHSU Orthopedics for Mr. Sullivan that needed to be rescheduled because of scheduling conflicts." - Dr. Michael Seale In this case, there were repeated scheduling conflicts resulting in the victim not being taken back to Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) for his one week follow up until week five. Dr. Seale seems to be deflecting blame from his department to the court even though the victim can prove, at least one medical appointment was scheduled long after his court date had been set. Specifically, the victim was found guilty of violating special conditions of supervised release in early June of 2017 and a sentencing hearing was scheduled for July. The victim's arm was broken on June 27, 2017. There is no way the county could have scheduled his follow up before the court scheduled his sentencing hearing. The Oregonian covered the violation hearing and printed a date for the upcoming sentencing hearing. If The Oregonian knew about the upcoming court proceeding then Multnomah County should have known as well. Dr. Seale also cites reports containing false information. For instance, when the victim made a statement to PAC Brook Holter that the versions of events given by deputies were false, she wrote down the opposite. The government has referred to her false record ever since as if it shows an omission by the victim against his own case. Dr. Seale points to the same record as if it indicates no pain on the part of the victim at the time, but the victim never reported that his pain was being managed properly until after a pain specialist doubled his nerve pain medication weeks later. At the same time, records of visits prepared by outside medical personnel consistently report the victim as telling a story strikingly similar to that told in his pleadings. It seems the story he is said to have told depends most on who claims to have heard it. Dr. Seale claims that a sling and swathe was recommended by staff at OHSU as well as a one week follow up. That is correct, but Dr. Seale does not mention that the purpose of the one week follow up was so that the victim could be fitted with a Sarmiento brace. He also does not provide any evidence Multnomah County told OHSU the victim would not be allowed a Sarmiento brace until his follow up five weeks later. That is important because OHSU had no idea that county policy would make the part of their treatment plan which called for a Sarmiento brace impossible. Law enforcement agencies and their medical co-conspirators love to stack the deck with false information indicating that an inmate may have made a statement supporting the government's version of events. That is true in this case. PAC Brook Holter falsely accused the victim of telling her a story that if true would support the government's version of events (https://ift.tt/GbNvyUa). We will be re-visiting old court transcripts in the near future looking for other incidents in which court dates were scheduled in advance before medical appointments. To be continued... #multnomahcountyjail #michaelseale #brookholter
Multnomah County has retained Dr. Kevin Murphy to help cover up inmate abuse at the Multnomah County Detention Center (MCDC). Dr. Kevin James Murphy describes himself in his expert witness report as "the chief medical officer of the Portland Timbers of Major League Soccer" before offering a weak opinion clearly intended to help deputies get away with breaking an inmate's arm and denying him proper medical care. A bootlicker like him does not deserve to be the chief medical officer of any team let alone a team with a progressive fan base like the Portland Timbers. It is well known that many Timbers fans are members of Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and other groups frequently targeted by law enforcement. After the murder of George Floyd, countless Timbers fans were beaten in the streets and wrongfully imprisoned in MCDC. Luckily, District Attorney Mike Schmidt was kind enough to grant most of them amnesty because otherwise they would have likely been abused by staff the second they asserted their rights. If any of them threatened to post a guard's home address on a website they could have been abused just like the victim in this case for the same reason. However, the victim in this case had gained a reputation for being mentally unbreakable, so they broke his arm. Breaking his arm didn't even work either, it just sidelined him for a bit and led to a lawsuit. To Dr. Murphy's credit, the victim in this case wishes that Multnomah County would have hired him years ago to treat his broken arm instead of Dr. Michael Seale (https://ift.tt/P9Swiln). Dr. Seale appears to be a general medical practitioner while Dr. Murphy appears to be a highly qualified orthopedic surgeon. However, Dr. Murphy's opinion on its face does not appear to rebut many claims made by the Plaintiff's experts, validates others, and at times overreaches into areas outside his field of expertise. The exact meaning of that last sentence will be exposed in federal court in the near future. Finally, as tax payers we feel ripped off by the rates Dr. Murphy is charging Multnomah County. According to his report, Multnomah County has been paying him $800 per hour for expert review and report preparation. That rate is about standard, but if the case goes to trial he will bill Multnomah County for $2,000 an hour for his testimony. We do not know why Multnomah County would go with such an expensive expert when surely they could have found a qualified orthopedic surgeon for less. Perhaps such doctors were not as overreaching as they would like. We the people have had enough. Wasting tax payers money in pursuit of injustice will not be tolerated. Plaintiff's expert witness reports can be found at: https://ift.tt/FdcU69A https://ift.tt/oZymV0q The point of posting those links is so that people that know what to look for know to look at them. Comparing them to the Murphy Report should reveal that there are many things the county fails to address or addresses inadequately as will be explained in court shortly. #portlandtimbers #kevinmurphy #sportsmedicineoregon #antifa
Trials that become more about who is on trial than what they did usually produce unjust results. That might happen again this week when the main phase of the trial of Patriot Prayer founder Joey Gibson begins. Gibson faces a single count of riot, but after looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, Cop Blaster concludes that Gibson is only guilty of harassment. Oregon law defines "riot" as "participating with five or more other persons the person engages in tumultuous and violent conduct and thereby intentionally or recklessly creates a grave risk of causing public alarm." See ORS 166.015 (https://ift.tt/sfogEU4). That language describes three essential elements; First, that the incident involve five or more people; Second, that the defendant personally engage in tumultuous and violent conduct; Third, the conduct intentionally or recklessly creates a grave risk of causing public alarm. The first element can be easily satisfied in this case, but there appears to be no evidence to support the second element because shoving someone is not an act of violence. Without establishing the first two elements the court need not consider the third element. The evidence thus far viewed in the light most favorable to the government supports at most a misdemeanor charge of harassment. Oregon law defines "harassment" as "Subjecting such other person to offensive physical contact; or Publicly insulting such other person by abusive words or gestures in a manner intended and likely to provoke a violent response;" See ORS 166.065 (https://ift.tt/86EstSI). Gibson may have done both in this case. The government alleges and the video below shows that Gibson shoved at least one woman which should satisfy the offensive physical contact element. If the conduct seen in the video below is the basis for the shove accusation it couldn't possibly constitute the type of "tumultuous and violent conduct" covered by the riot statute. This opinion is based on the minor nature of Gibson's shoves. While it is possible for a shove to constitute an assault or an attempted assault thus constituting violent conduct, that does not appear to be the case here. A shove must be at least an attempt to cause bodily injury in order to fall within the scope of an assault statute. When someone subjects another to an unwanted shove without trying to hurt them they are guilty of harassment. That is unless Gibson can show he was defending himself somehow which may have been the case with some of his shoves, but not all of them. Even if he could defend every shove, that wouldn't get Gibson out of the woods. He is still accused of publicly insulting people in a manner intended and likely to provoke a violent response. Leading a group of people to a place you know you are not welcome, basically daring everyone to fight you, and hurling obscene insults sounds like harassment to Cop Blaster. Going to the place and hurling insults shouldn't be a legal problem because when done as part of political speech it is protected by the First Amendment. People have a First Amendment right to picket or otherwise hold a public demonstration in front of a business for reasons including disapproval of their customers. Joey Gibson has just as much of a right to stand outside Cider Pub and say what he thinks of Antifa as Ruth Sent Us has to stand outside Morton's Steakhouse and say what they think of Brett Kavanaugh. There is no constitutional right to congregate and drink hard cider or eat an overpriced steak dinner. The difference here seems to be that Gibson repeatedly dared people to come out and fight him in the street. Even if Ruth Sent Us dared Kavanaugh to come fight them in the street (which they are not believed to have done) they would not have had a reasonable belief in the provocation being successful. By pairing his constitutionally protected insults with an open invitation to fight, it appears that Gibson crossed the line from simply being offensive to attempting to provoke a violent response. Attempting to provoke a violent response is not a violent crime, so it cannot be treated as such for the purpose of satisfying the riot statute. The fact that other members of Patriot Prayer have pled guilty to riot has no bearing on this opinion because they actually were rioting. However, not everyone with the Patriot Prayer group were rioting. It seems like there were a few bad apples on both sides. Treating Gibson like a rioter seems more like putting him on trial for leading Patriot Prayer than what he actually did that day. It also diminishes the importance of having a riot statute in the first place. If the government fails to distinguish between violent and non-violent conduct people might stop protesting out of fear that they might get blamed for someone else's violence. The opposite could also occur if people decide to become full blown rioters because they know they will be prosecuted just the same, so they might as well have fun while they can. Deputy District Attorney Brad Kalbaugh appears to be overreaching in this case. Hopefully Judge Benjamin Souede will give jurors the option to find Gibson guilty of a lesser charge for his lesser conduct in this case. Convincing a reasonable juror to think lesser when they think of Joey Gibson should not be a problem. #joeygibson #patriotprayer #antifa #harassment #riot #bradkalbaugh
Watch out for this mf, he will snitch, call the cops, he is a sneaky mf. Will smile and be your best friend and then fuck your girl. Watch out #snitchcopcaller
Joe Crist is a CI. I've seen the paperwork. He's a rat and will snitch to cover his own ass. The tough guy persona is all a front to cover up he is a coward #snohomishcounty #crist #snitch #informant
This woman called the cops on me 4 times for no reason and because she wanted me to stay away from my ex she falsely filed 2 felony charges against me. She is also an fbi informant. This cop caller lives in Tracy CA #ossai ##greenharris#zalikhasafdari
Gail Anne Curley is frustrating the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Such conduct violates the First Amendment and will not be tolerated. Curley has repeatedly asked state and local law enforcement agencies to arrest peaceful protesters outside the homes of Supreme Court Injustices (SCIs). Her latest efforts include writing letters to the Governors of Maryland and Virginia requesting that unconstitutional statutes be used to jail non-violent pro-choice protesters for peaceably assembling. Who the hell does she think she is? If you've never heard of her before that is because normally nobody cares about the Marshal of the Supreme Court of the United States. That changed a couple months ago when women learned they wouldn't have control over their own bodies much longer. They took to the streets outside the courthouse and homes of conservative SCIs. I became involved after I learned that members of Congress and others were trying to persuade the Department of Justice to enforce an unconstitutional law against protesting outside the homes of judges (see Maps to Supreme Court Justices Homes at https://ift.tt/sjacINW). It was bad enough that the women's groups were afraid to post publicly available information about SCIs on their own websites, but the media blamed them for it after I posted them. I did my own public records research and found records linking properties from news coverage of protests to the SCIs. Over the years I've had my right to free speech trampled on by the government, so I know an unconstitutional restriction on freedoms everyone is entitled to under the First Amendment when I see it. The Maryland statute that Curley seeks to have enforced says that a "person may not intentionally assemble with another in a manner that disrupts a person's right to tranquility in the person's home." That statute is unconstitutionally overbroad because it does not distinguish between the home of a government official and the home of a private citizen. Federal courts in other parts of the country have said that it is legal to picket outside the home of a government official. For instance, when a federal prosecutor suggested to my attorney that I may have been in violation of a law against making publicly available restricted information of protected persons, she countered that courts have upheld the right to publish home addresses of police officers in the past saying such activity furthers many legitimate interests. See Brayshaw v. City of Tallahassee, 709 F. Supp. 2d 1244, 1249 (N.D. Fla. 2010), "The publication of truthful personal information about police officers is linked to the issue of police accountability through aiding in achieving service of process, researching criminal history of officers, organizing lawful pickets, and other peaceful and lawful forms of civic involvement that publicize the issue." Brayshaw used a website called Rate My Cop to post the home address of a Tallahassee Police officer. If Brayshaw's conduct is clearly protected by the First Amendment because it could be used to organize lawful pickets then surely picketing itself is a constitutionally protected activity. That is why I don't mind posting addresses of people like Gail Curley at a time like this because the address is most likely to be used by picketers. Therefore, I am merely exercising my First Amendment right to encourage people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. To those ends, I have researched Gail Anne Curley's address history and like a lot of people she appears to have failed to remove her address from public records. The most recent address I have for her is: 1530 KEY BLVD APT 515 ARLINGTON, VA 22209 DATE RANGE: 2013-2021 RELATIONSHIP: OWNER I say "most recent address" because the background service I use has been known to be outdated at times. However, I have since found more information about that property (https://ift.tt/ckNQ4Zu). According to the city of Arlington, that address is a condominium currently owned by Gail Anne Curley. The address history from my background check service for this individual is consistent with that of someone just old enough to have graduated from the United States Military Academy in 1991 before moving to Champaign, Illinois to attend University of Illinois College of Law during the same time period that Gail Curley earned a J.D. from that school located in the same town, and the rest of this person's history is consistent with what one would expect for a long time military officer like Colonel Curley. For these reasons I believe the Gail Curley from the records I have to be the same Gail Curley responsible for writing letters to multiple governors seeking the arrest of unarmed women protesting peacefully. However, it is possible that she could have sublet the place or something, so keep that in mind. UPDATE: Some of the people she sent letters to are not happy about it. See video below: #scotus #gailcurley #abortion #freespeech #fakecourt
smitty was pulled in a "routine" traffic stop and in the backseat floorboard of his girlfriends car was close to 17 grams of meth and a pistol. now! mind you he is a covicted felon and by no means would have a gun or if he had known the gun and drugs were in crystal jo dilly car he would have not pulled over . He gets bonded out and goes back to work crystal mind you starts posting crazy stuff on her facebook and lying how smitty did this and that but yet the whole time smiling in his face and collecting his money on payday. right before smitty is to recieve his discovery papers she spits in his face at work and then goes home and destoys everything he owns, see pics. now the cops were called i guess in hopes that he would have to leave but he was told his name is on the lease they cant make him go anywhere. but he ends up sleeping in the garage until she started another fight with him and kicks him in the nuts while on the phone with me! im all the way in oklahoma so what all can I do but listen, right. well we get him a room and food and tell him go to court go to work stay away from her. My question is how is this justice and why is she able to get away with this! on the discovery she is the first name besides the detectives and to wich she has bragged more than once about one of the detectives and her "friendship"! Mind you smitty has been clean since release on bond and continues to work and show up for court, how can we get him a lawyer to take this pro bono and how can we shed light on this snitching ass methhead? This is not her first rodeo she ratted out her own nephew and rumor has it her girls father who if not released is soon to be. She has literally destroyed all he owns forced him out of his own home and continues to stay twacked back but yet has a failure to appear for stealing from walmart? Rehabilitation is not just for convicts ! there needs to be something done about paying drug addicted snitches to set people up and continue to do so. Mind you this is an open case and crystal will not recieve her other snitching pay until jury, so we are in need of justice for smitty! and justice against all rats! #snitch #rat #liarmethhead