This is a story of police cowardice the likes of which we've either never seen before or cannot recall seeing before if we have. If you have not been in solitary confinement for the past week, you've no doubt heard about the massacre of 21 people including 18 innocent children at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. When we first heard about it we didn't pay much attention because it sounded like just another school shooting. We heard about the hero that killed the shooter who happened to be an off duty Border Patrol agent and thought it was nice to hear about a law enforcement officer going above and beyond the call of duty by taking it upon himself to put in work while off duty. Then today we noticed headlines saying that the Uvalde Police Department (UPD) had already been at the scene for the better part of an hour protecting the shooter from the victims' parents. Not long ago we thought about adding a tagline/slogan to our site as a message for law enforcement. That line was "do JUST your job!" What we were thinking by that was that we wanted to tell police officers to do just their jobs and nothing more. We didn't get around to ever using the tagline, but are giving it second thoughts. We want police officers to do their jobs first by upholding the Constitution because defending the Constitution is their most important job. Upholding the Constitution might sound simple because it is, but police officers often view the Constitution as a obstacle to getting what they want and decide to consciously disregard it. When officers refuse to do just their jobs there can be benefits like fewer innocent people in jail, but it can also have far worse consequences like preventable innocent deaths. We've said before that there are some functions performed by police officers which every community needs to function, but we've also seen proof that police officers are not necessary because if a function is important enough there will be others willing to perform it. The case of the inmate government at the United States Penitentiary this author was incarcerated in is a good example of an alternative government. That government handled issues such as theft, dope debts, snitching, and sex offender management. If someone stole from you, didn't pay a debt owed you, snitched on you, or was known to you to be a sex offender, there was a government for that. If you went outside that government then you would have a problem and rightfully so because the inmate government is better than the federal government. This is just one example of why abolishing the current institutions of police is a good idea because they won't be replaced by anarchy. They would be replaced by something better. Something new that only has the time and resources to intervene in life or death emergencies, but leaves everyone alone otherwise for the most part. Had the shot callers this author remembers from prison been in charge, they would not have let Salvador Ramos waste oxygen for 10 minutes let alone 40-60 minutes as the UPD are alleged to have done here. This author knows guys that have taken on entire SWAT teams by themselves without guns. They didn't come out looking well, but the fact that they have the balls to do stuff like that suggests that they would have been better suited to handle Ramos. Those guys would have put holes in Ramos just like they did the only white guy dumb enough to set foot on the yard as a convicted rapist. In the video below, CNN pelted law enforcement officials with questions highlighting their epic failure. As is typical, other LEOs are jumping to their defense with a fog of war defense. As if nobody can put themselves in the shoes of an officer at all let alone a reasonable officer in the position of officers on the scene at the time. Eventually, Texas Department of Public Safety Steven McCraw admitted that responding officers screwed up, but seems to defend them still by saying they were confused and thought they were dealing with a barricaded subject, not an active shooter. News footage from the time of the shooting however shows officers stopping parents from trying to do their jobs for them. In hindsight, those parents would have been better off shooting the police and going after Ramos themselves. We like to stay away from discussing publicly scenarios in which shooting police officers is morally justified because we've learned in the past that the government is quick to twist such things to make them appear as if they're attempts to incite violence. Despite this concern, we feel the need to point out that there are some situations in which parents might need to choose between securing the lives of their children and not shooting police officers. In such scenarios, we will always argue that the wellbeing of children supersedes the wellbeing of officers. That is based on the simple fact that an innocent child with his/her entire life ahead of them is more deserving of survival than an adult because no adult is without sin. We hope that any officer reading this will understand that while we do not wish to see them shot that we would much prefer to see them shot instead of kids. That said, we think that the next time parents hear gunshots from a school and the police seem more interested in holding them back than neutralizing the shooter, the parents should strongly consider shooting the police and then going after the shooter themselves. If you're a police officer concerned that someone might shoot you the next time you ask them to stay back during an active shooter situation, remember to do just your job. That job is to neutralize the shooter, so there shouldn't be a conflict of interest between neutralizing the shooter and protecting parents. We can think of no justifiable excuse for Ramos to have still been alive when most of the parents were still being held back. The police say he was barricaded in a room, but that is no excuse. Police have tear gas, concussion grenades, and other ways to incapacitate people when breaching a door. A blinded suspect with his ears ringing is far preferable to one with all the time and ammunition in the world. #robbelementary #salvadorramos #murder #schoolshooting #cowardssource https://copblaster.com/blast/48818/cowardly-cops-let-psycho-massacre-school-kids-in-texas
Be careful of this lady. She is a known meth head and is a thief. She will steal from you, then she will try to say someone else did it. She is DRAMA. If you piss her off, she will call CPS on you and make an anonymous tip on the drug tip hotline. #grantcountysnitch
This dudes a snitch bitch I got paper work on this peace of shit. Set me up at my own job in Buffalo Minnesota . Gave me a 100 dollar marked bill and I was arrested and had to do 1 yr in jail .putting your ass on blast now pussy boi #informantmonticellominnesota
Maury County Deputy James Thomas was indicted for falsifying documents during a federal investigation last week. A federal grand jury charged James Stewart Thomas with one count of "Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations" in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1519 (https://ift.tt/JwmPR4u), see PDF link above map for indictment. The media is reporting this as if James Thomas was arrested for rape because the documents he falsified falsely accused an inmate of making sexual advances towards him and omitted the fact that he had sex with her. You're probably wondering why he is not charged with rape, so are we. We think it is due to conflicts of interest with the local district attorney and federal jurisdiction. The local news has repeatedly blasted local authorities for failing to take action in this case. Such failures are known to draw the eyes of the feds from time to time. They see it as a federal obligation to intervene when local authorities are unable or unwilling to do their jobs. In this case, the feds probably couldn't charge him with rape due to the crime taking place in the state of Tennessee with no nexus to interstate commerce. However, when the FBI began investigating another matter the documents became evidence in a federal investigation, so the feds can now charge him with obstructing a federal investigation. Think of it like lying to the face of a FBI agent while he's looking for your missing sister, you could have lied to anyone else and been just fine, but now you'll do fed time. Thomas is no stranger to the spotlight. He made headlines regularly after his teenage sister Elizabeth Thomas was kidnapped by her 51 year old teacher. The Amber Alert lasted quite a while, but they eventually found her and he is in prison. According to public records, James Stewart Thomas is a 31 year old resident of Columbia, Tennessee. His last known home address is 2550 Pillow Drive, Apartment A9, Columbia, Tennessee, 38401. We are making that address available because we wouldn't be surprised if he is granted pre-trial release due to him having no priors, deep ties to the community, a long history of working as a law enforcement officer, and the crime he is charged with not being categorically a crime of violence. We think that had he told the truth in his report he would have been charged with rape years ago. We wish we could find a copy of this video that we could embed below for you (https://ift.tt/kmabugd). Please do not use this information for any unlawful purpose. We simply want potential victims to be aware of the danger lurking in their area. That is why we are exempting Thomas from our usual courtesy of censoring home addresses of law enforcement personnel. We think it is in the interest of public safety that people know this information if it pertains to them at all. #jamesthomas #rape #elizabeththomas #obstruction #liars #fbi
On January 5, 2022 My fianc' Jeffrey Plotke & I (Kelsey Skelton) were stopped by the Lincoln Police here in Lincoln, IL. We were at a stop sign on Sangamon St and a Lincoln officer Chad Eimer and Clinton Wombles had stopped us. Eimer stopped right in front of my 2016 Hyundia Sonata and he came to the passenger side of my car and asked Jeff to get out of my car. Jeff complied. He got out and Eimer searched Jeffs person. He had nothing on him. Eimer then came to the passenger side of my car and asked "Kelsey are you okay?" I said "Yes, I am fine!" I asked him to not arrest Jeff & that he hadn't done anything wrong, that we had just been in a verbal argument. Nothing had ever gotten physical between us. Eimer had said that he wasnt going to arrest him. Soon as he said that and he was about to let us go there was another Dodge Truck pulling up on my passenger side and it was officer Kevin Lynn. He got out of his truck and you could tell that he had an attitude as soon as he got out of the truck. He went to Eimer and said "No! Arrest that son of a bitch, and cuff him up and take him to the jail and book him on disorderly!" Soon as Lynn said that I saw Jeff running. He was running to the left towards the train tracks. He ran about 20 to 30 ft. Clinton Wombles the other officer had been the first officer to take pursuit after Jeff, and he was yelling at him telling him to stop or he was going to shoot him with the taser. Jeff then had stopped and he had his hands up in the air and even then Clinton Wombles still shot Jeff with the taser. He had been tased in his back and in his head/face. I got out of my car and i went to where they were and Jeffrey at this point was on his stomach and his hands were behind his back. He looked up at me and said to me "Kel, why are they beating me?" I just shook my head and said "I don't know Jeff." I was crying and screaming for these officers to stop beating on him. They were stomping on him, Kevin Lynn at some point had taken his gun and placed it into the side of Jeffreys ribs and he had pulled the trigger. He almost took his life. The gun for some reason did not go off thankfully (was said in the discovery). Jeffrey was taken to the Lincoln Emergency room, and they had done x-rays and they came back with a medical report stating that Jeff had no injuries. He was then taken to the Dewitt County jail in Clinton, IL and he was complaining of pain for well over a month until he finally got x-ray again by a place called biotech. It came back that he did in fact have broken ribs. He keeps seeing flashes of light to due with his eye sight and being shot in the face with that taser. His bond is $12,500 and he has 3 different charges. #1, Resisting arrest #2, Aggravated Battery to a Peace officer #3, Trying to disarm a peace officer These charges are all crap. The only charge that he is guilty of is the running! I don't know why he ran. I think his brain and his legs were telling him 2 different things. Jeffrey has always respected the Lincoln Police every time we had ran into them. I don't know what to do or where to turn anymore. I am begging for help for him. This is not the first time lincoln officers have done something like this. May 2022 The lincoln Police had beat up my ex huisband and broken his ribs! A couple weeks after this happened to me n my fiance my ex husband Christian J. Skelton was t hrown to the ground and was tased and they also had broken his ribs. ] Kelsey Skelton #lincolnpoliceexcessiveforce
San Jose Police Officer Matthew Dominguez was arrested this past week for masturbating in front of a mother and her daughter while in uniform inside a home in response to a call. If you're shaking your head thinking that Cop Blaster is not a reliable news outlet, watch the video embedded below this article or click the source link above the map. Despite being walked out the front door by his boss on camera for all the press to see as an example of accountability, he remains on paid administrative leave. We would like to thank San Jose Police Chief Anthony Matta for taking prompt action in this case despite the disturbing news that Dominguez will continue to collect a paycheck. We believe that Matta took care of the most important things here which were to put Dominguez in jail and take his police powers away. We hope that the legislative body most capable of stopping the next Dominguez from getting a paycheck under these circumstances takes swift action. Dominguez's own union has turned against him. San Jose Police Officers Association President Sean Pritchard released a statement saying, "I am absolutely disgusted by this repugnant allegation that damages the reputation of our profession... If this is true, the individual must be held accountable and he should never be allowed to be a police officer ever again." According to public records, Matthew Dominguez was born on February 12, 1990 making him 32 years old. His last known address is 150 Palm Valley Blvd., Apt. 2103, San Jose, California. We are making his address publicly available because he is charged with a sex crime that carries with it a requirement that he register as a sex offender for 10 years if convicted. We exempt officers from address censorship in extreme cases such as being charged with a sexually based offense. We recommend that people living nearby lock up their wives and daughters, but ask that nobody commit any crimes against Dominguez because doing so could jeopardize our ability to continue to improve public safety by warning of dangerous officers in specific locations. If convicted and sent to jail he will probably get what is coming to him, so nobody in society should feel the need to do anything illegal to him. We would like to thank a specific defense attorney for this tip, but are not sure if she would want to be thanked publicly by name on this site. #matthewdominguez #indecentexposure #masturbation #sexoffenders
This guy...SMH He is a meth/ice dealer.He mixed bath salts with his stuff,entices underage girls and of age women with the drug to get them messed up so he can sexually abuse them.He does this from the basement of his parents home with zero regard to them.Everytime he gets popped he's doing zero time.I happen to know on good authority that it's indeed bc he is a snitch.Hes sent many to jail.And assaulted many women.Hes a weirdo freak.Thid is his profile pic on Facebook.Adam Richard Seavers. #methhead #dopeseller #creeper #snitch
This cop is one of the many corrupt. He KNOWINGLY had a sexual relationship with a 16 year old child. Follow the link to read more #corruptcops
Beware this crazy chick. She is a needle using, lying, stealing HEP infected snitch. She will turn people in for upsetting her. She has shared her needles with people and did not disclose that she has HEP!!!! #hephavingsnitch
Beware this Gross chick!! She set up a bunch of her so called friends to get herself out of jail. She is a baby factory. She KILLED one of her babies while it was in the womb. She was to busy smoking spice and setting up her friends. She now is Scott free, with all her kids and man while her associates are either in prison or on hard times due to her setting them up. #snitchofallencounty
This man is a CHILD PREDATOR. He likes them YOUNG. He uses his dogs to get attention and gain trust. He has a record of domestic battery, and helping his CONVICTED child molester brother Danny Hogle with robbing and attempting to murder an old lady. He will cause trouble then play victim and then call the cops as well as CPS. BEWARE #grantcountypedophile
This is April Hill. She lives in Marion Indiana. She is a known crackhead, meth head and prostitute. She will get you to get her drugs, and turn you in. She will steal from you, then claim she is going to commit violent acts upon you, then run and cry to people that she is the victim. #grantcountysnitch
This SNITCH and his girlfriend Shalea D Crawford offer rides in exchange for meth. When they find out where the dope houses are, they turn them in. His girlfriend Shalea also will turn tricks with guys for dope or money and then claim they raped her. Pyro drives around in a grey minivan and they live with a gay guy named Jeff. Pyro trades sexual favours with Jeff for money. #snitchofallencounty
Shalea D. Crawford is a SNITCH for Allen County. She stays with her boyfriend Adam Thompson aka Pyro. They trade rides for meth and when they find out where the dope house is, they call it in. She was in Allen County Jail in January and February of 2022 and she SNITCHED to get out early. They ride around in a grey minivan. She also turns tricks for dope and then tries to claim the men raped her. #snitchofallencounty
Beware of Jeremy Robert Adams. He is a local junkie that is POSITIVE for AIDS. He will get close to you, try to buy drugs from you, steal from you, then he will report you to the Narcotics hotline if you upset him. He frequents the local hotels in Allen County. #aidspositivesnitch
Torrance Police officer Evan Dahl was arrested on Friday for uploading child pornography. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children received a tip back in March that someone had uploaded child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to a social media platform from a computer in Torrance, California. The tip led the LAPD's Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force to the Torrance home of Officer Evan Dahl. Dahl was still employed by the Torrance Police Department (TPD) at the time of his arrest. He was cited for possession of CSAM in violation of California Penal Code 311.11(a), but later RELEASED. Based on what we know of the case so far we think that Dahl's release was made possible in part by under charging him under circumstances that appear to illustrate a conflict of interest between local law enforcement and their job descriptions which technically say they're charged with pursuing criminals to the fullest extent of the law. The tip received by authorities alleged possession and distribution of child pornography. As a former federal convict whose hobby and occasional job it was to help the rest of the general population find out what people were in for, this author knows that distribution of child pornography is a separate and more serious offense than simply possessing the stuff. In prison this distinction doesn't matter because those in there for any type of CSAM offense are considers weirdos either way, but it makes a huge in the eyes of the court at sentencing. This author has seen weirdos get off with probation for possessing child porn while those convicted of far less serious offenses (ex: bank robbery, drug conspiracy, assaulting a federal officer) receive far more time. That is one reason why a lot of guys that are doing decades behind bars make it their missing to protect society from sex offenders by making sure the only way they get out is in a bag. Unfortunately, prisons created "protective custody" programs which allow people like Dahl to escape justice by doing their time in special housing units (SHUs) kept separate from other inmates under 23 hour lockdown, but at least the PC program makes their time much worse which isn't a bad consolation prize for the rest of us. Disclaimer: This author did not make it a hobby and occasional job to lookup people's charges for the purpose of causing anyone physical harm, but rather because prison was a boring place and learning fun facts could really liven the place up. Just because somebody stirs the pot doesn't mean they are trying to physically harm anyone. It just means they realize how easy the pot is to stir and the high probably of that stir making at least one day more entertaining than just watching TV all day again. On top of that, this author being a nerd serving a short sentence meant the likelihood of him being asked to put in work in such cases as slim to none which meant that figuring out what people were in for would at worst give him something else to do and at best give everyone a show. Most of the stuff on basic cable is either boring, something this author has seen before, or both. Providing fellow inmates with true facts pertaining to sex offenders was an easy way to find something to do and something new to watch at the same time. The potential for violence was obvious, but due to the nature of those potentially on the receiving end of such things their safety is not terribly important to this author. It is not that this author ever tried to specifically incite violence, this author simply gave people information without caring about sex offenders anymore than the rat this author's cat dragged in the other day. To give justice a better chance of being served in this case, this author emailed the LAPD press release to the last Assistant United States Attorney assigned to his case. The proposition being that they put people in prison for far less, the locals obviously are not zealously pursuing this case, and better remedies exist at the federal level. For the record, this author was in federal prison for making threatening communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. 875(c) and then for assaulting a federal employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. 111(b) while serving a 24 month sentence for the threat. This author was released from USP Victorville in the spring of 2016 where he served his time for the assault. While serving a violation for hacking computer monitoring software he was supposed to be running on his computer and posting a guide online to help others do the same for the purpose of discouraging probation from using IPPC Impulse Control which was so easy to hack that the government should have thanked this author for exposing the vulnerability (https://ift.tt/DmE3Mr9), but rather than try a less vulnerable program that doesn't use high amounts of system resources they acted as if he personally was to blame if anyone they were supervising used his advice to thwart computer monitoring. While awaiting sentencing on the violation this author threw chips in a deputy's face and pled guilty to a count of assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. 111(a). In every case this author was held without bail as a danger to the community. Holding people until trial without bail indefinitely for any charge other than murder is something only the feds can do. They can do that because there is no bail in federal court. Scenarios that would normally require the posting of bail result in the defendant being detained pre-trial as a flight risk or a danger to the community. That is especially true if circumstances exist that would require "enhanced" bail in state court. Such pre-trial detention is a blatant violation of the Eighth Amendment prohibition on excessive bail because no bail is more excessive than no bail at all, but the Supreme Court has since proven its own illegitimacy by ruling that no bail is not excessive because the Constitutional prohibition on excessive bail cannot be applied to scenarios involving no bail because no bail is technically a bail amount of $0 which cannot be considered excessive. We feel that Officer Dahl should be treated no better than this author was treated for conduct far less serious. This is especially true when you consider the fact that this author was morally justified assaulting corrections staff due to his initial prosecution being a First Amendment violation and that it is simply not possible for federal correctional officers to both honor their oath to protect the Constitution and assist the federal government with holding people whose prosecutions were motivated in part by protected speech. Speech that was protect, but offensive to most. When one of those offended people started stalking this author those actions were met with a death threat for which the prosecution threw the book even thought they knew the first person to break the law in that case was the one reporting the threat. A legitimate government would not arrest a stalking victim for threatening to kill his stalker and continue to prosecute the person after it was revealed that the stalking was motivated only by protected speech posted online by a third party and this author's refusal to remove it. Instead, our illegitimate occupational government used the stalker's motivation to justify employment and computer restrictions on the grounds that without them they felt it was only a matter of time until someone started stalking this author and this author learning from his mistake would not issue a warning next time. It was a classic heckler's veto (https://ift.tt/kv3oubC). It is what happens when law enforcement view their oath as an obstacle to getting what they want when what they want is not compatible with their oath. To sum it up, we reject the idea that an officer is just doing their job when doing that job results in them violating the Constitution or assisting others in doing so. This applies to correctional officers because without them there would be nowhere to hold people that don't deserve to be held in the first place. We won't say they are just as responsible as those that prosecute people, but they still bear responsibility for blindly assisting with the mass incarceration of people with no regard for whether they actually deserve to be in prison. When it becomes a near statistic certainty that there is at least one innocent person in every prison, every correctional officer bears some blame for keeping that person there. Unfortunately, they seem to think it is more important to have places to warehouse people than it is to make sure they are not keeping anyone innocent in that warehouse. As long as that remains the case there can be no such thing as an innocent officer. Perhaps if the courts required evidence proving beyond scientific certainty that people are guilty they could become legitimate institutions of government, but as long as they let anybody say just about anything on the witness stand and allow lay people the freedom to say that people are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt even when the . How could that be fixed? Replace all juries with judges, require all judges back up their decisions with written explanations as to why there is no scientific possibility of the defendant being innocent, and promptly fire any judge found to have made an unconstitutional ruling. This would surely result in most judges losing their jobs, but isn't that point? The point being that the current system is too failure prone to be reliable for something as important as deciding whether or not to take someone's freedom away. The flip side to the last paragraph is the common belief that without police officers nobody would be there when people are seriously harmed. That is not true. While it is true that police officers routinely perform necessary functions (ex: arresting Evan Dahl and other sex offenders) those functions are almost always performed by some segment of any community worth living in. Therefore it is safe to say that if the police were abolished that somebody would step in the fill those shoes. In prison those shoes were filled by inmates. Inmates that smash people off the yard for things like stealing from other inmates or giving information to law enforcement. Now, if inmates perform police functions are we not hypocrites for supporting them and not police officers for doing the same thing? The answer is of course "no" because the inmates are setting up their own government as an alternative to the occupational government. Going to the staff is like inviting Russian troops to perform police actions on American streets because anyone that goes to the staff is essentially betraying their fellow inmates by endorsing a rival government. By creating their own separate superior government within the prison, inmates establish a legitimate claim of right to police the prison themselves. They certainly have a more legitimate claim to do such things than United States government does. If we had the resources we would overthrow the federal government, replace all current LEOs with fresh blood, and repeat the process on an employee by employee basis whenever any police officer, prosecutor, or judge is caught to have engaged in a Constitutional violation. Some have called for this process to include a firing squad to be used, but we don't think it would be necessary simply because usually all you must do to neutralize the threat a bad cop poses to the community is take their badge away. Most of those people are nothing without a badge. Those that present threats to society that taking away a badge cannot neutralized (like Evan Dahl) can be put in prison where they belong. Under federal law, CSAM distribution is governed by 18 U.S.C. 2252 (https://ift.tt/oxcVT6L) which carries a mandatory minimum of 5 years in federal prison. That minimum is for mere possession of CSAM. Like many federal criminal statutes, the one at issue here covers a wide range of offenses ranging from simple possession to distribution and production. We believe that 2252(a)(2) applies to Officer Dahl. We also know that the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG) feature a wide range of enhancements designed to make sure that distributors get significantly more time (https://ift.tt/WHwUbNO). The United States often considers available remedies at the state and local level before deciding to take a case. Usually, there are two reasons for the feds to take a case. The first being jurisdiction either geographically or legally and the second being the inability of local law enforcement to serve justice. Geographic jurisdiction is pretty self explanatory, but there are things lay people probably don't know like there being some jurisdictions for which only federal prosecutions are available (ex: Indian reservations, military bases, the District of Columbia, and "maritime or territorial waters of the United States") and that any nexus to interstate commerce no matter how small can establish federal jurisdiction. In CSAM cases, like most cases involving computers, the likelihood of downloading or uploading anything to the internet without data being transmitted across state lines somewhere is slim to none. That transmission is all the feds need to charge someone with using a mechanism of interstate commerce to distribute CSAM. Legal jurisdiction simply means that there are federal statues which cover federal crimes regardless and not all federal crimes require things to cross state lines. Drug manufacturing is a good example because all one must do to end up in federal prison for manufacturing methamphetamine is get caught running a meth lab. There is no additional requirement that the product of the lab be shipped across state lines. The main non-jurisdictional factor seems to be the inability of locals to deal with a case competently due to insufficient local laws or incompetence. We know that California has a separate and more sever offense for those that distribute CSAM (see California Penal Code 311.2 https://ift.tt/QqZxb4y), so we know lack of local laws does not explain why Dahl is under charged. The remaining explanation is incompetence. That incompetence can be willful or in the traditional sense of the word. In the traditional sense, the locals in this case appear to know that Dahl distributed CSAM, but are not charging him with distribution. Given the high profile nature of the case, we doubt this to be due to an oversight by the prosecutor's office. This leaves willful incompetence as the last possibility. Willful incompetence runs rampant in law enforcement, especially when allegations are made against fellow officers. Fellow officers are reluctant to investigate their friends and colleagues just like most people are reluctant to help law enforcement investigate their friends and colleagues. There is always a conflict of interest. That conflict often results in officers being under charged or not charged at all. We suspect willful incompetence to be the most likely explanation for the lack of a distribution charges in this case. According to public records, Evan Dahl is a 23 year old resident of Torrance, California. The last known home address we could find for him is 4431 West 234th Place . We are exempting Dahl from our usual courtesy of censoring home addresses of police officers because he has been formally charged with a sex crime against children. We make this exception because we think we would be doing the public, especially parents and kids living in his area, a disservice if we did not allow them the opportunity to know that there might be a sex offender at this location. There is also a good chance that people doing research on properties in the area will find this article and learn than an address near the location being research is linked to an alleged sexual predator. We ask that people avoid this residence, make sure their kids do the same, and avoid any contact with the man photographed above. Nobody has ever been physically harmed as a result of Cop Blaster with the lone exception being this author whose arm was broken by a correctional officer after he threatened to post his information on this site if given a disciplinary write up. The message that this author intended to imply was something like "sure, you can write me up, but I can write you up too, my audience is bigger than yours, and I bet I can find information about you the publication of which would be far worse for you than the embarrassment of letting me tell you how to run the jail." Realizing they had no statutory recourse, they managed to given themselves recourse by taking this author to a secluded part of the jail where no cameras could record (no body cams and surveillance did not record because the sheriff says they're for observation only) and the only non-staff witnesses were too psychotic to ever provide a court with credible testimony. The deputy then broke this author's arm before the supervising sergeant shoved this author's head into a mattress and said "I run this f*cking jail not you!" This was quite shocking for someone that went from being a recent college grad and mostly law abiding entrepreneur to being an inmate overnight just a few years before. Like most academics, this author considered risks based mostly on the written law with little thought given to how far less intelligent and less educated people could find ways around the written law when they're the ones charged with enforcing it. People that spend most of their life being told that they are smarter than most people can at time find themselves appearing stupid to the common man because they do things based on what they've learned in school that defy common sense. Things like telling an officer they know their rights and what the consequences for the officer will be if those rights are violated often result in excessive enforcement against those that law enforcement institutions were never created to oppress in the first place. This can leave such people at a disadvantage because their segment of society is not used to such treatment and doesn't have the resources to fight back the way communities which are used to being abused by police do. This might sound far fetched to educated people with no history or run-ins with the police who think that surely if they were abused in such ways they would have legal recourse. Then they learn the hard way that most personal injury lawyers don't want to take cases against law enforcement and they certainly won't take cases in which the plaintiff pled guilty to assaulting the defendant even if the assault did not legally justify the officer's response. This can remain the case even after independent experts have reviewed a case and sided with the plaintiff because lawyers know how stupid jurors are, that they probably can't get past the conviction even if the transcript from the plea hearing does not legitimize the officer's conduct, that jurors in general find experts too confusing, that people too stupid to get out of jury duty have a tendency to be more conservative, conservatives are more likely to blame detainees for whatever happens in jail just because they broke the law due largely to the simple fact that they're too closed minded to ask whether the law being broken is just in the first place, and even if a jury sides with a plaintiff on the issue of how the arm was broken they could just as easily chose not to reward that plaintiff any money if they think doing so might send a message to obey the law and not fight back at all. Such jurors have a tendency to go home after the trial and tell their family that they empathized with the defense due to the circumstances created by the plaintiff, that they would have wanted to break this author's arm too or worse, and that this author's threats were so provocative that if anyone deserves a break its the deputies that didn't want their addresses posted online for everyone else they write up to find when they get out. This is at least the message this author got when trying to sell the case to lawyers most of which only take such cases on contingency if at all and are not willing to represent someone with a history of attacking law enforcement unapologetically in a lawsuit against law enforcement. This has essentially left this author in the position of being a person denied equal access to the courts by virtue of lawyers serving as gatekeepers. It seems some people are considered unrepresentable and therefore must pursue civil matters as their own lawyer unless they have an extra $100,000 sitting around which few recently released ex-cons have. That is why this author remains self-represented. Again, please do not do anything to property or people at the address previously listed. If a pattern ever emerged of people getting physically hurt after being posted on this site we might not be able to do this anymore. When the feds floated the idea of charging this author with unlawfully making publicly available personal information of protected persons in violation of 18 U.S.C. 119, some interesting facts emerged. Facts like it always being a defense to a charge of violating that statue that the information was already publicly available. Since this author got all the addresses from an online background check service, no charge of making such information publicly available cold be sustained simply because nobody can make publicly available that which is already publicly available. Furthermore, the government cannot legally ague that there exists a compelling state interest to suppress information that the government itself made publicly available. To do otherwise would require the government to accuse themselves of regularly engaging in conduct contrary to compelling state interests. However, the freedom to legally post cops' addresses could vanish if a pattern ever emerged of people being physically harm after being posted on the site. We learned about a seminal case called Planned Parenthood v. America Coalition for Life Activists (https://ift.tt/5zWkFfw) which involved a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood accusing the pro life group of violating the same threat statue this author was convicted of violating without posting or transmitting any threatening language. The activists simply posted profiles of abortionists on a website called Nuremburg Files in reference to Nazis conducting abortions on Jews and other "undesirables" they considered threats to the "purity" of Aryan bloodlines. Eventually people listed on the site started getting killed. The repeated pattern of homicides was enough to get the Ninth Circuit to say that posting another abortionist on the site after that pattern emerged was all it took to constitute a threat under federal law. The court's logic was that the people posting the profiles knew or should have knew that that the act of posting alone would likely put the subject in fear for their life due to the previous killings, so the threat allegation could be sustained without a finding that the defendants made any threatening statements. Due to the Planned Parenthood case we would probably have to stop posting addresses if such a pattern were to emerge. However, the Planned Parenthood case also involved a ruling that the pro-life activists posted the profiles with the intent to incite the harm feared which is why their speech was not protected by the First Amendment. No such intent exists here. Even if a pattern of people reacting to articles like this one in ways we do not intend were to emerge, that still would not amount to an attempt to incite anything on our part or inflict fear of such incitement. If someone were to apply Planned Parenthood to us we would argue that although we are aware that someone could read our articles and react violently, that such behavior would be the result of others reacting inappropriate and not the result of any intentional incites from us. This could create a need for the Ninth Circuit to clarify that one must intend for the reaction to actually take place not simply that they were merely aware of a risk and just didn't care due in part to simply not caring about those claiming to be at risk. Planned Parenthood was also a civil case with a much lower burden of proof than had the feds charged the pro-lifers with a crime. In a lawsuit one only needs to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the pro-lifers intended to make the abortionists fear for their lives which could be established with the patterns, how obvious it was the the activists knew of the pattern, and their decision to keep posting anyway. That would not suffice in a criminal case because there would always be reasonable doubt as to the specific intent of the activists. Preponderance of the evidence on the other hand only requires a finding of it being significantly more likely than not that the defendants intended to restrict access to reproductive healthcare by making murders of the unborn fear for their lives. Conclusion Evan Robert Dahl of Torrance, California should be arrested by the FBI and held without bail for distributing child pornography. Until then we will do all we can to help those in his community stay safe while he is out on bail. We do not want anyone to physically harm Dahl while he is free in the community because if a pattern of people being physically harmed after being posted here were to emerge we might have to face a legal challenge based on the common prosecutorial presumption that being aware of a substantiated risk and doing something anyway equates to intentionally subjecting other to fear of that risk. The truth is that intentionally doing something likely to result in another fearing such risk and doing it anyway because you simply don't care about their reaction is not the same as intentionally provoking the reaction. It simply means you know how most people react to some things, that you consider the common reaction to be inappropriate, and that you consider the only people to blame for such reactions to be those reacting inappropriately even if the inappropriate reaction can be attributed to psychological responses common among those considered "normal" by the psychiatric community. #evandahl #sexoffenders #childpornography
San Bernardino County is being sued because multiple deputies and at least one Welfare Fraud Investigator failed to report a mother for child neglect, resulting in the child being sexually abused "most likely over 1,000 times" by a now former deputy. This information comes from a complaint filed in a civil lawsuit against San Bernardino County. Per the lawsuit, the child's mother wouldn't provide for her child's basic needs, didn't register them for school, would abandon the child while doing drugs, and didn't stop her child from moving in with Deputy Jeremie Cox, an unrelated male who had no legal authority to watch after the child. While the child was living with Deputy Cox, Cox would sexually abuse the minor "over 1,000 times", would take them on vacations and would have the child do ride alongs. Deputy Cox was arrested in September of 2021 after a male victim reported him to the Crimes Against Children Unit with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. Jeremie Cox has been charged with 27 felonies, most of them are related to the victim he sexually abused from 2013-2016, four felonies for sexually abusing a child from 2001-2002 and possession of a machine gun. The named mandated reporters in the lawsuit: Dep. Scott Leach, Dep. Dale Dyer, Dep. Tim Brown, Dep. Marylee Brown, Dep. William Ziemer, Dep. Amanda Thomas, Dep. Jeremie Cox, Sgt. Stephen Spear and Welfare Fraud Investigator Heather Moon. #mandatedreporter #childneglect #childsexualabuse #negligence
The new malware by the name of 'Heart Ehyze' Has taken Southern Asia by storm. Unexpectedly by storm, Heart Ehyze has infected up to 1 thousand computers across India prompting XMR in exchange for their files. It has been reverse engineered and discovered that, despite the low-level spreading techniques it still managed to spread by email. The malware itself has not been spreading much recently and has started to slow down as people become more aware of the ransomeware. Indian intelligence agencies suspect it could be the Chinese, but have no proof. India now urges their citizens to be more aware of malware and other varieties of this malware in the near-future. by Kim Zetter. #malware #hacker #india #southernasia #heartehyze #ransomeware
Philadelphia Police officer Edsaul Mendoza was arrested today for the murder of 12 year old Thomas "T.J." Siderio back in March. According to prosecutors, Siderio was shot in the back while unarmed and Mendoza knew he was not armed. That summarizes what we know about the government's case so far. If you're more interested in the mainstream media coverage of this case we recommend checking out the link above the map on this page as well as the video embedded below the body of this article. The main purpose of this article is to supplement the mainstream media coverage with some information that we've since discovered ourselves. Edsaul Mendoza is not an easy person to dig up personal data about because neither the press nor the government have released his middle initial and his date of birth was hard to find. We found his date of birth after looking up his name in the Pennsylvania court system (https://ift.tt/mpytv81) and finding case number MC-51-CR-0007104-2022 which was filed today as well as the charging document which we are uploading as a PDF with this article. The PDF icon can be found above the map. The PDF lists Mendoza's charges as they've been reported by the press. It also includes his date of birth (11/11/1995) which you need to find out if he is in jail and what jail he is in (https://ift.tt/Lfb7FRt). Rarely is it so difficult to find out if someone is in a jail. Usually you only need their first or last name to see a list of partial matches. Sometimes they require both a first and last name, but seldom do they require a date of birth. Requiring a date of birth makes it almost impossible for anyone outside of that person's immediate family to see if they're in jail. The city of Philadelphia would probably defend this practice as a privacy measure, but we feel it does far more to cut off inmates from society than protect anyone. This author personally writes people in jails/prisons and doesn't know their birthdays. Most of their friends are probably the same. Surely most inmates would want it to be possible for their friends to be able to learn how to write them. In this case, being able to use the jail website properly takes on a heightened sense of urgency due to the remote yet very realistic possibility of Mendoza posting bail eventually. People have a right to know if this kid killer is still in jail without having to sleuth their way to his birthday. Charging documents usually display the full name of the defendant (ex: State of Florida v. Theodore Robert Bundy), but you won't even find a middle initial on Mendoza's charging papers. We suspect this of being due to a desire to make finding information about him difficult. Our background check service usually finds detailed address histories of most cops we lookup, but we could find no matches for anyone named Edsaul Mendoza anywhere. Perhaps if we had a middle initial our luck would be better. Other online records do not list his full name or middle initial either, but do tell you some things about him. One source reports that Mendoza made just $20,035 working as a police officer for the city of Philadelphia in 2020 (https://ift.tt/vFUpT60). The previous two years report $61,686 each. Why was Mendoza's pay cut by about 2/3 in 2020? In a year in which most officers reported record income due to overtime thanks to Black Lives Matter, Mendoza made way less. Possibilities include being on leave due some disciplinary matter, simply health related, or something else entirely. We would really like to know. Finally, The arresting officer is listed as Daniel P. Murawski. #edsaulmendoza #thomassiderio #murder
Cyber-terrorist group, coreisis has been rampaging twitter with their latest hacks. Could these certain "Cyber-Terrorist" Be of a real threat and should be concerned with homeland security? Or are these just prepubescent children looking for "Internet-fame"? Whether or not they are, and despite the fact that the group is still relatively small, their hacks show that they aren't. Their most recent attack on the popular image sharing website "Imgur", imgur is an American online image sharing and image hosting service with a focus on social gossip that was founded by Alan Schaaf in 2009. The service has hosted viral images and memes, particularly those posted on Reddit. Showing a cross-site scripting attack, for those non-tech savvy people, Cross-site scripting is a type of security vulnerability that can be found in some web applications. XSS (cross-site scripting) attacks enable attackers to inject client-side scripts into web pages viewed by other users. A cross-site scripting vulnerability may be used by attackers to bypass access controls such as the same-origin policy. Which is a well known vulnerability within the Cyber-Security fields. During our investigations, We found that the group is a highly-secure team and capable hacking group. One of their members carrying out most of the attacks, is also the creator of well-known telegram malware "Toxic-Eye" as well as other malwares. Toxic-eye spreads via phishing emails containing a malicious .exe file. If the user opens the attachment, Toxic-Eye installs itself on the victim's PC and performs a range of exploits without the victim's knowledge, including: stealing data. deleting or transferring files. Noting some of their other Cyber-Attacks which include Database leaks, EC2 Subdomain takeovers, and defaces. By Jackson Huey. #hacker #hackergroup #cyberterrorist #imgur #hacker #databaseleak