Surry County Sheriffs Department,(was called dispatched on) June 29,2022 they were called to a residence, they were supposed to be serving and protecting me, I called for a deranged grandmother, she tried to kidnap a 48 year old woman. I have had problems with these enforcement agencies along with King police Department located in king NC. when I get the documents downloaded will be posting a few articles and other documents, really from other law enforcements from not only NC, VA, GA, FL, TX, and last but not least lol. (Alaska) OH My I actually got a sealed document that has false accusations on it recording of me being a deranged black woman. now U will have to know where this really came from. DO u know how dangerous this is by looking the site I see cops that has killed my culture I see. Now how can a police department, put in that main data base and say they ran your license from a state where u have never had a license ???? how so, that looks like grounds for that is a civil law matter, and yes I have reported it already. Nothing never done, I am new to the area, so I already knew what I would already face. I had called this states police department already. Well as I was unpacking I ran across many many documents I just getting back around, things had to be shipped from Alaska back to the lower 48, so it was out in a storage in Texas my solider is special now. I should have started the story what happened in 2004. I decided to tell you with this police station already did last night. Thursday, Sept 29, 2022. This is why I called ahead to let them know I will be standing my ground this time 'Legally" through the FEDERAL COURTS, not saying another hostile threats at all. NC FBI has been called, NC STATE Bureau, FBI (Alaska) all these federal agencies. Including the Fairbanks police station in Fairbanks Alaska. I believe that's is why was me and my child I had ( active military) was harassed last night, me trying to get on base ( FORT BRAGG) because I felt like I was having a heart attack, keep in mind now I have the proof this very same incident happened in Alaska, strange huh.???????? What happened in the emergency room. I called Alaska State trooper yesterday earlier, I mean they are on a different time frame than we are. I called , the lady answers' her reply my I help you. "I said I need to talk to a State trooper, she said what is this in regard??? I said I well mam, I called in May or June, was not in front of the document, at that time up above I clearly stated it( up above ) it was in a storage at that time. I assume she thought she was gonna tell me the same as her, and others" have told me in while I was in GA, for a little. This time I stopped her, before she could give me that same old line all the agencies have done, and used from 2004 till 2022. They are aware that I have access to this and many many many other documents., so I believe they called down here to N.C and to Bragg and it almost seems we have been watched, I mean they don't think, I know what's going on. God speed to the people, all all these states" Best thing for me to do at this point, is write a letter to the chief justice, at the federal level. I might as well address now, so what is on that NCIC should even be there, and really it could have turned bad for me, I was in distress, and I am a sickly woman, and this police department here oh my they took my id' and my license( would not give it back) this is to the whole world. go look up Beverly Smith vs Joe Maye, and Joe Maye vs Beverly smith. I called the city of this county NAACP, and u know what he told me, oh we cant help you like Surry County, Winston Salem, Georgia, Alaska NAACP. They have told me the same line all these years. What happened to THIS ORGANIZATION???? are they scared of the police or something are they giving them money to let them obstruct justice what is the problem.?? I am ashamed at this point from how they have treated a person they once helped, but I mean look at the year 2004, Surry Community Education unit, Imma send u back to 'Africa article Beverly G smith was 29 years old, I am now 48, and they got away with it, and I have called off and on to these NAACP all over in these states. u think they would help me. No they to busy belittling me on the phone today, FAYETTEVILLE, its not looking to good for u guys to get help from the President here, He already told me over the phone, and Winston Salem chapter, and Georgia chapter, oh my u cant even find no one for the ( SURRY COUNTY)NAACP chapter they do not even know who is who lol. #beverlysmithsource https://copblaster.com/blast/48886/justice-never-served
Palm Bay Police officer Sheridon Archer was arrested yesterday on a single count of lewd and lascivious battery on a child aged 12-16 years of age. According to media reports, Archer used the MeetMe and Snapchat apps to setup two sexual encounters with a 13 year old girl at her home while on duty. Archer is still being held in the Brevard County Jail on $500,000 bail. Case number: 2022-00333722 Docket number: 22CF045916A According to public records, Sheridon Edward Archer is a 23 year old resident of Palm Bay, Florida. He is a registered Democrat with no prior criminal record. #sheridonarcher #sexoffenders #snapchat #meetme #childmolestation
Joseph Camp is a self-described conservative edgelord, pro se nightmare, social justice issues photographer, talent manager, and god fearing human, but he's also a jailhouse snitch. In 2011, Camp was a pre-trial detainee at Leavenworth Detention Center (LDC) formerly known as CCA Leavenworth in Kansas. There he was smashed out of his cell by a sex offender and told on him. A copy of Camp's complaint to prison staff is being uploaded as a PDF with this article. There are proper ways to deal with sex offenders in prison but letting them kick you out of your own house and snitching them out is not one of them. I've been aware of Camp's history for well over a month but found myself pre-occupied with subsequent discoveries some of which are trying to put Camp and his alleged associates in prison. CURRENT ISSUES Snitching on your cellmate is not as bad as putting people in jail in the first place. That is what Camp's nemeses are trying to do to him and a married couple at the moment (https://twitter.com/BulIyville/status/1567522387175899137). His archnemesis appears to be James McGibney of Bullyville.com. Camp has posted the names of McGibney's kids online. McGibney is understandably furious over Camp's reprehensible tactics, but it seems you don't need to target McGibney's kids to be targeted by McGibney. It looks like McGibney will target you if he thinks you've given Camp financial support, "I'm going after ANYONE who financially supports him" (https://twitter.com/BulIyville/status/1567518603305418752). I consider that inappropriate because the only person responsible for what Joey Camp does is Joey Camp. Hypothetically, I would like to feel free to hire Joey Camp without being targeted for his other activities. I can think of several organizations and individuals against whom Camp's skills could be put to great use. Even if I could not, such targeting makes it more difficult for people to re-integrate into society, so should the campaign to send Camp back to prison succeed, he will be more likely to re-offend once released because people will be afraid to hire him. I started following Bullyville a.k.a. James McGibney on Twitter shortly after seeing him in a Netflix documentary called The Most Hated Man on the Internet. McGibney seemed dedicated to blasting Hunter Moore for a good long while before announcing an upcoming Bullyville TV show targeting other people. McGibney's primary target appears to be Joey Camp. Camp's enemies consider him to be a serial internet stalker with a long list of victims amassed over the past decade. However, many of those claiming victimization at this point are at worst claiming to have been doxxed which is not a crime or falsely accused of pedophilia which might be a crime depending on where Camp is. Camp claims to be in South America right now but his online stalkers are convince they have undeniable proof of him being in Florida. The exception to that appears to be McGibney's children whose names were recently posted on Camp's Gab account. However, McGibney himself does appear to have used his own children in promotional material online or at least that is what a video by one of his associates appears to show (https://twitter.com/ZileAndBea/status/1570548650891415557). That doesn't make posting their names alright. The issue with McGibney's kids led to me having a falling out with Camp which culminated with him blocking me. I'd been talking to Camp a little bit because McGibney's online associates compared my writing to his pro se filings. Our first conversations were about the unconstitutionality of most revenge porn laws. Later our conversation turned to McGibney, but Camp was quick to ask me not to talk about McGibney because he doesn't consider "McFaggot" relevant anymore. When I wrote an article advising anyone contacted by a TV show called Bullyville to contact a lawyer, Camp posted the link and Bullyville referred to a quote from it as Camp "trying to intimidate his victims from coming on our TV show" (https://twitter.com/BulIyville/status/1568274558196514823). The quote was not Camp at all but rather me. I was not trying to intimidate anyone from talking to Bullyville, but I do hope those contacted contact a lawyer before talking to the show it they think they might be asked to incriminate themselves or someone else. If the show is any good, it will likely move beyond McGibney's primary targets and focus on those currently unaware of being on his radar. If you think Bullyville might ask you to incriminate yourself or someone you know talk to a lawyer. McGibney quickly sent me a direct message accusing one of Camp's followers of trying to contact his kids at school. I responded by letting him know I don't approve of that. Then I sent Camp a message thanking him for sharing my link, but also letting him know of the accusation. I told him I didn't approve of targeting kids and asked that he direct his followers not to contact anyone's kids for any reason. He responded with several comments I've never been able to read because he blocked me. Shortly after that he posted a court document containing the names of McGibney's kids. That is conduct I do not support, but at the same time I don't think he committed a crime. Camp appeared to be posting an old court document and told McGibney to say "hi" to his wife for him. McGibney's wife is well known and her name appears alongside her husband's in several mainstream news articles. Such conduct does not rise to the level of a true threat under federal law, so it cannot be considered internet stalking despite what McGibney's associates claim (https://ift.tt/8cCDkn9). To charge Camp with internet stalking under federal law using the theory presented by "CredibleIntel" the government would need to prove he intentionally put McGibney, Danesh or a member of their families in fear for their physical safety. That is a high bar legally which cannot be met simply by posting the names of someone's kids or telling him to say "hi" to his high profile wife. Even contacting someone in person is not necessarily enough because that contact would have to include threatening conduct. Camp could stand outside McGibney's house with a sign and yell "hello" to his kids without committing a crime. He would have to do something else capable of elevating such an encounter from annoying, weird, and inappropriate to a threat of bodily harm. Something like what Andy Castillo did (https://ift.tt/17ZGgCx). I am qualified to discredit internet stalking claims because I was once wrongfully indicted by the feds under the same statute but using a different theory. The theory in my case was substantial emotional distress which had no merit because you can't criminalize free speech based on claims of emotional distress. That argument is just as relevant today as it was when the feds dismissed the charge against me, but "CredibleIntel" argues a different theory. They claim Camp's conduct was intended to place people in fear of death or serious bodily injury. Anyone can claim an internet post made them fear for their life, so they need more than someone simply posting a name, home address, or pictures of people with vile comments. They need to show behavior like Castillo's which included specific threats of violence, or they need a pattern of behavior which is clearly intended to produce the same result without serving a legitimate purpose. Sometimes the latter can be satisfied by showing up physically at someone's home but even that behavior can be legal if politically motivated and peaceful (https://ift.tt/IPormle). I thought it was messed up how McGibney's been targeting Jennifer Couture and her husband for allegedly hiring Camp to smear Danesh Noshirvan. Noshirvan, better known as ThatDaneshGuy on Tiktok, habitually targets people by posting videos of them breaking laws, figuring out who they are, and getting them kidnapped by the government. Danesh claims responsibility for several past government kidnappings and nearly put himself in a position to claim responsibility for Couture's road rage charges, but the police report revealed her license plate is what led police to her (https://ift.tt/Th4cIqN). I was disturbed by the online activities of McGibney and his associates to the point that I prioritized them as a greater threat to the public than Camp. If McGibney's TV show ends up being anything like his Twitter feed it will make getting people kidnapped by the government a priority. I'm all for people who've been bullied online saying something about it, but I draw the line at trying to put someone in prison for cyberbullying. Some have accused Couture of physically showing up at Danesh's home. I have not seen any video footage of this alleged incident. One person claimed to have CCTV footage of it but wouldn't give it to me unless I removed an article about Danesh (https://ift.tt/i5BeMv4). I've asked for links to any videos put out by Danesh or anyone else showing anyone at Danesh's home but have received nothing. Likewise, when I asked for any sex offender paperwork on Camp I was told "I have never claimed that Camp is listed as a sex offender" (https://ift.tt/hwliRna) which confirmed my suspicion that Camp has never been convicted of a sex crime. Despite this several of his enemies accuse him of being a sex offender online (https://twitter.com/waltermasterson/status/1568278782816960514). Camp seems equally guilty seeing as how he accused several people of being pedophiles who've never been convicted of sex crimes either. Danesh and McGibney are of course alleged victims. I say "alleged" simply because for all I know they could both be closeted pedophiles but absent any evidence I won't accuse them. Couture was convicted of several misdemeanors after being falsely accused of felonies due in part to a viral video (https://ift.tt/JmVrw4E). She flipped out on Anjalyke Reed at a Dunkin Donuts, tried to grab Reed's phone, and backed her car up in Reed's direction before leaving. Nobody was hurt and nothing was damaged, but that didn't stop Reed from making a big deal out of it. Reed sent her video to Danesh and went to the cops. I thought that approach heavy handed under the circumstances. While I fully support Reed's decision to upload the video and publicly shame Couture for her flip out, I am adamantly against getting someone kidnapped by the government over it. Likewise, I am against efforts currently underway to thwart her effort to get off probation early. McGibney's associates repeatedly Tweet what they say are violations of her probation (https://twitter.com/CredibleIntel/status/1561841677630840832). They clearly want to get her violated or at least keep her on paper as long as possible hoping to get her violated eventually. I'll always take a stand against such things because of a personal experience. My personal experience was being on federal supervision while doing something the feds get a lot of complaints over. We had status conferences with the judge every few months during which my lawyers would renew my request for early termination. Every request was denied until I had just two weeks left at which point I was let off early for good behavior. That good behavior included being on supervision for two weeks shy of three years with zero violations. However, the judge denied my early termination requests citing the extraordinary nature of early termination in the federal system which is entirely an issue of judicial discretion. Generally, if a supervisee is the subject of complaints from the public on a regular basis they won't get off supervision early. The government doesn't even need to provide evidence of complaints to thwart early termination. There was one point when my P.O. came to talk to me saying the FBI would send "a couple suits" if he didn't ask me some questions for them. When my lawyers tried to get discovery from the government they called it an active investigation and the court didn't feel they should be compelled to turn anything over unless they charged me with a violation or a new crime. This will likely be the case at Couture's hearing on Halloween. The government will probably tell the court about all the complaints they've received and even though they might not prove a violation it will probably be enough to make the judge keep her on probation. I will usually speak out against efforts to keep someone on supervision, especially when those efforts appear motivated primarily not by the crime itself but rather political, ideological, social or economic objectives. There are of course other accusations against Camp, but most of them appear too old to be considered for prosecution. Anything more than 5 years old is not chargeable. Bullyville Tweets out old information on a regular basis. Much of that information did not result in criminal charges. Some of it includes restraining orders and injunctions that Camp allegedly violated, but I've learned over the years not to trust claims made in restraining orders. Just about anyone can get a restraining order as long as they are willing to make certain accusations under oath. They don't need to prove anything. Camp has been repeatedly targeted by Antifa while filming protests. They also accuse him of posting their personal information. That seems to be the most common reason people want Camp kidnapped by the government again. Posting personal information is not a crime, so that could explain why the government has not kidnapped him again yet. WHAT JOEY CAMP DID WAS WRONG Camp claims he was wrongfully classified as medium security by the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) which has since been rebranded as CoreCivic. His classification claim might have merit. I am intimately familiar with the classification system used by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) which is supposedly the same. I was wrongfully classified as high security due to a false allegation of escape which I eventually got overturned. The "escape" was really just a BOP incident report about me being placed in a police car at a halfway house against my will. I should have been medium security. Based on what I know of Camp's history at the time and the seriousness of his offense (hacking) he should have probably been low security. Despite being in a medium security unit, Camp should have had recourse for dealing with his sexer celly Brian LeGault (https://ift.tt/N4WP7Ub) without needing staff intervention unless he was in a protective custody unit. That sex offender wouldn't have even been there to smash Camp out in a proper active medium security housing unit. In a normal general population situation, sexers like LeGault are taken care of quickly. You just go to your racial representative with evidence and the rest is automatic. There will likely be people waiting to put in work willing to back you up when evicting the sexer. How the eviction is handled depends on where you are. In the softest of units sexers are forced to move in with other sexers, better units simply threaten to smash them if they don't leave the unit, many places simply smash them out in front of the staff so its known they can't walk the yard there, and some places send torpedoes (https://ift.tt/y6qaksx) with shanks to stab them. All those options are preferable to getting beat up, snitching, and checking into protective custody (PC). This is called a "career killer" in the feds because it means he will never be safe in general population again. The best he could hope for would be getting sent to a PC yard full of snitches, sex offenders, and gang dropouts. Unfortunately for him, it can take years to get to a PC yard. The BOP usually experiments with people like him to see if they can make it in general population a few times before finally sending them to a PC yard. PC cases are often run off or smashed off before being put in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) for their own protection. SHU is also the disciplinary unit, so they are on lockdown 23 hours a day, have limited access to commissary, can only make one phone call a month, may rarely access a small law library, and are almost always denied access to medical care. I know someone who died in a SHU because medical ignored him (https://ift.tt/7sUGEbL). It often takes about 6 months for the transfer to be approved and the inmate moved to a new prison. The process repeats until they make it to a PC yard. People like McGibney, Danesh, and just about anyone who's never been to prison probably don't realize they're endangering someone's life every time they try to get them kidnapped by the government. If people thought of calling the police as endangering someone's life, like they should, they probably wouldn't pick up the phone so much. Nobody should call the police without asking themselves, "do I really want to endanger someone's life today?" I don't see anything Joey Camp has done that would justify legally endangering his life over. A conviction under 18 U.S.C. 2161A (https://ift.tt/GY6UxvX) would probably result in years of cruel treatment far worse than anything he appears to have done online. I don't agree with a lot of stuff Camp posts, but I'm glad someone like him can still find a place like Gab to express his views. If he can still have a platform in 2022 then maybe the rest of us will still have one in 2032. Finally, check out the video below featuring an alleged Joey Camp threatening to call the police on someone. CONCLUSION Joseph Anthony Camp is a jailhouse snitch, but snitching on your celly is not as bad as trying to put people in prison in the first place. #joeycamp #jamesmcgibney #daneshnoshirvan #jennifercouture
When I was 18 years old this kid used to be my best f****** friend. Then we decided we were going to start trapping because around here it's either trapping or working your ass off for some b**** who's going to cheat on you in the end anyway. So we got really into it and then all of a sudden we got busted with a little more than we should have or would have liked to at the time. I get it that we were young and we had our lives ahead of us but in all reality this dude was the one who paid for all the drugs they were his drugs he was so excited to claim to all the ladies that they were his drugs but as soon as the cops came on us and we were busted then they were my drugs and then I was the plug and I was selling pounds a week and all of this s*** just decided to get put on to my lap when in all reality I sold a couple 20 bags for him here and there. He was just mad because he wanted to f*** my girlfriend and she told him no and then the next day the cops rated us, I got 10 years in prison. #jakekelly#yearslaterstillsnitching#fatpuke
Correctional Deputy Brian Kolkemo is being sued for slapping a paraplegic man in a wheelchair before stealing his wheelchair and leaving him laying on the floor of a holding cell for several hours. Kolkemo has not suffered any disciplinary action whatsoever. In fact, Jackson County Sheriff Nathan Sickler continues to stick by his man. Sickler asked that the lawsuit be dismissed. State police referred the matter to the Jackson County District Attorney's officer for prosecution but charges were not filed despite this conduct constituting harassment at a minimum. The victim, John Malaer, was wrongfully arrested for disorderly conduct and harassment before being released. The charges were dismissed. Seems Malaer may have won the lottery here. I'd trade a night in jail for an excessive force claim backed by video evidence an day. Malaer may also have an inadequate healthcare claim, but was in jail for such a short period of time he probably can't show any tangible loss as a result. He was stripped of his wheelchair, denied a catheter which he needs to urinate, and soiled himself. County jails often deny inmates adequate medical equipment. Wheelchairs or anything else from outside which have metal parts are denied even if medically issued. For instance, I was denied a special brace used to treat broken arms in another county just because it had metal parts. Unlike Malaer, the brace was not brought it but rather attempted to be given to me by an orthopedic PA during an outside medical appointment. They often justify inadequate healthcare whenever additional safety risks are involved even though under the law they cannot justify denying adequate healthcare for staff safety reasons. Inmates have the right to the same level of care they would receive in the community regardless of any risks incurred by jail staff. Those in charge, like Sheriff Sickler, often defend striking inmates in any manner whenever they are not cooperative. For instance, when caught on camera punching and kicking people they will call it "focused blows" necessary to gain compliance. Blows of any sort are not justified when the subject is unarmed, paralyzed, and in a wheelchair. Other correctional facilities in Oregon are the same way. During my last case I was falsely accused of assaulting federal officers and was under various court orders intended to stop me from giving information about court personnel to inmates, so to screw with me the staff at FDC Sheridan sent me across the street to the hole at the FCI under a "threat assessment" whenever I was there. One time they put me in with an old crippled sex offender in a wheelchair. I told him I wasn't living with him and made him ask to be moved, but the staff refused to move him. They told me unless I beat him up they would leave him in there. He suggested he just laydown and act as if I'd knocked him out which he did, but the staff didn't buy it. Feeling like I was being setup to catch a new case for assaulting a vulnerable individual, I bucked on the staff. I held my dinner trays hostage, waited to be cuffed up, and pulled my one cuffed hand into the cell through the food port breaking off the handcuff key. They flip out whenever an part of a handcuff key is lost, so they threw me in a special cell for that. Eventually my assault charge was dropped to just impeding and I was released. According to public records, Brian P. Kolkemo is a 40 year old resident of Medford, Oregon. The last known address I could find for him is 12838 Ramsey Road. This address is being pasted here with the caveat that it will be removed if Jackson County and Kolkemo settle Malaer's claim in a manner considered satisfactory by Mr. Malaer. Please do not use this information for any unlawful activity. #briankolkemo #johnmalaer #nathansickler
This is Mark HATTON. He likes to do awful things with young boys! Be very careful if u befriend him. He is very manipulative so use extreme caution! #becarefulifyoubefriendmarkhatton
Danesh Noshirvan reported that he'd been informed of a CCTV tape allegedly showing Jennifer Couture, "driving around the parking lot coming back and trying to hit her with [her] car again." Noshirvan prefixed that statement with "from what I understand, there is more CCTV footage" which implied he may have been told that by a third party. I'm not about to accuse him of lying because there is no evidence of that. It is entirely possible someone else told him there was a CCTV tape of Couture driving around like a total psycho trying to hit someone, but the police report never mentions a CCTV tape and no CCTV tape has ever been uploaded. If there really was a CCTV tape I think Danesh would have uploaded it by now. Such a tape would have significantly lowered the chances of her aggravated assault charge being dropped to a misdemeanor. She would probably have been charged with attempted murder had there been a video of her driving as Danesh described. False information like that has an unjust impact on defendants in criminal cases. It gives their lawyer more work and increases the probability of poisoning the jury pool. Most damaging, it increases the likelihood of police officers pursuing someone in the first place by creating a public outcry. The police report credits Couture's license plate for helping them identify her, not Danesh's video. Still, Danesh played a role by giving Couture's name to Anjalyke Reed in time for her to give it to police the next day. How Danesh identified Couture in the first place is not clear, but I guess he probably had someone run her plate just like the cops did. Then Danesh went a step further and contacted Couture himself. He asked her about the incident and she admitted to it. Then Danesh uploaded Reed's video with his own snotty commentary taunting Couture by claiming to be the reason she'd be getting kidnapped by the government soon. Danesh went beyond being a mere commentator to a volunteer web sleuth. Even though police would have caught Couture anyway, it is the effort that counts. Using social media to contact someone and gather evidence with the intent of channeling that evidence to the government via an intermediary is snitching. Danesh claims responsibility for getting others kidnapped by the government (see video below). Such channels encourage internet snitch culture which benefits the prison industrial complex and furthers the sissyfication of society. The real victims here are those who've been kidnapped by the government. Reed walked away just fine and still she sicked the cops on Couture. If someone tried to grab my phone, talked to me like that, and backed their car up near me, I wouldn't call the cops. I wouldn't have even been filming in the first place, but that is not the point. She had all her property, nothing was damaged, and she didn't have a mark on her body. It takes a certain type of vindictive individual to send a video like this to someone like Danesh and file a police report. A better person would have just said "whatever bitch" and went about her day. If I were Reed, I would have uploaded the video and shared it everywhere, but I wouldn't file a police report. The embarrassment of being identified by name in a video like that should be punishment enough. What allegedly happened to Danesh next is something I'm still piecing together. A lot of it sounds like gossip and crazy stories. What I do know is somebody, allegedly a far-right political activist named Joseph Camp, launched a major assault online and elsewhere on Danesh's reputation. Camp's Gab account is updated regularly with attacks on Danesh calling him all kinds of crazy things. The billboard in this post's featured image was found on Camp's Gab account as well as an image of a full page advertisement in a newspaper featuring the same graphic. Danesh has also had his home address, phone number, and other contact information posted online. Who takes out a full page ad and plasters someone's face on a billboard? Someone outrageous and truly dedicated. I'm not calling that number for help. Camp has amassed a long enemies list over the years some of whom have started attacking Couture with accusations of funding Camp. Acting as if she is partly responsible for anything he does as long as he is employed by her in some way. As if paying Camp to perform one job equates to sponsorship of his other activities. Her husband is also on their chopping block. People are looking for Camp constantly. Some of them broke into Couture's stable (https://twitter.com/ZileAndBea/status/1562289766556631041). It wouldn't surprise me if the next people to let Camp crash on their couch are next. Some of Camp's tactics are great ways to stick it to your snitch, especially if your snitch lives in a small town. Take out a full page ad in your local paper and put up a billboard next to the highway into town. Those are great ways to expose true facts about snitches, but I prefer you just use this website. The posting of names and information about them is also a legitimate response to being snitched on provided you don't threaten anyone. You have a First Amendment right to criticize someone for being a snitch, so use it. The police report being uploaded with this article is a good read. Seems Couture was more worried about the video being uploaded than she was about getting arrested. Conclusion Danesh helped people snitch on the wrong bitch. #daneshnoshirvan #joeycamp #jennifercouture #roadrage
Bullyville founder James McGibney seems proud of his history as a "federal witness" in many cases. He's boasted his history on Twitter at least twice in the past week. Last week, he posted screenshots of a declaration by Special Agent Walker Wisevich which said, "James McGibney is a cooperating FBI witness in the ongoing criminal investigation against Mr. Retzlaff and others." A couple days ago, he Tweeted "I'm a federal witness and very soon, you will be a defendant (again)" to someone he's been trying to get arrested for years. This shouldn't be news for that man and the other targets McGibney's identified on his Twitter feed so far, but it could be alarming to anyone else contacted by Bullyville for a TV show in the near future. McGibney claims there will be a Bullyville TV show soon and told people to watch his Twitter feed to find out who he'll target on the show. So far he seems to be posting the same five names over and over again for the most part, but has since expanded his attacks to include third party associates. Unless the Bullyville TV show only plans on having 5 episodes, someone will be contacted in the future by a TV show run by an active FBI informant. If you're involved with any legally questionable activity wouldn't you like to know if the TV show contacting you is a conduit of information for the FBI? I would like to know if a show's host is actively trying to get people kidnapped by the government. When a television network run by statists decides to give a prolific FBI informant a national platform you can bet they expect him to do all he can to get people arrested. Like John Walsh of America's Most Wanted, McGibney is for all intents and purposes on the same level as a police officer. Professional snitches are snitches of the worst sort. While there might be room for sympathy in other cases of snitching such as snitch activism for the purpose of removing revenge porn (ex: https://ift.tt/AUOyr5p) or ratting someone out to save your own skin (ex: https://ift.tt/4eAcQXR), there is far less room when someone chooses to become an arm of the state professionally. This makes James McGibney a clear and present danger to the liberty, and happiness of American citizens just like the federal government. To McGibney's credit, many of the people he's targeting on Twitter appear to have messed up histories. Thomas Retzlaff is alleged to have jacked off in front of his kids (https://twitter.com/BulIyville/status/1567326775323119616). If true, I'm glad he was murdered last year. One thing I learned in federal prison is that killing sex offenders is community service. I wouldn't be writing this if pursuing sex offenders were all Bullyville does. Also to McGibney's credit, several of his targets are alleged to have targeted his kids. If true, reprehensible conduct in my opinion. One thing nobody has to worry about from me is targeting their kids. I do post addresses of people sometimes, but I'll never post names or pictures of their kids, where they go to school, or anything like that. I won't even do that to people who've gotten me kidnapped by the government. I always say being related to people like that should be punishment enough. Swatting is another thing I won't do. Only snitches swat. Its not possible to swat without calling the cops. My mother was swatted by a stalker just because I wouldn't take an accusation posted by her ex-boyfriend off a site of mine. I've never swatted anyone so I thought such conduct made my family and I the real victims. The government conceded she was behind the swatting, but still prosecuted me for threatening her (https://ift.tt/BaqSIZD). Ever since, I've had nothing but contempt for targeting people just for associating with someone. McGibney appears to be targeting anyone he believes to be friends or business associates of his enemies. If I have a problem with someone I target them directly. I'm not going to get involved with gang stalking anyone linked to an adversary unless there is a government nexus. At least McGibney doesn't hide behind a screen name and targets people capable of fighting back. I respect that. By putting his real name on accusations they're more credible. However, at times the ability of his targets to fight back appears impaired either by the government, big tech censorship, or their own self restraint. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on many of his claims, but I can't support trying to get people kidnapped by the government and over charged. I am however willing to cut snitches some slack if I think they're only telling on certain types of people. Those types include sex offenders. When I was in prison, I learned the best people to talk to about sex offenders are white supremacist gang members. Their sex offender management programs are state of the art, but often not available on the outside without significant legal liabilities. This makes sending sex offenders to prison an ideal solution to the sex offender problem. I prefer castration to making good dudes have to put in work, but some asshole decided that was a civil rights violation. Every second the police spend on sex offenders, dirty cops, snitches caught re-offending, etc. is a second they don't have to target good dudes. If McGibney limits his efforts to sexual predators, those that target kids, bullies with badges, government informants, and politicians I'd likely consider writing articles like this a waste of time. If you're contacted by anyone associated with Bullyville or James McGibney, consider it the same as being contacted by the FBI If you're involved with anything legally questionable talk to a lawyer before talking to Bullyville. If you talk to Bullyville assume you're being tracked by the FBI and everything you say is being recorded. One target of McGibney's appears to be the victim of a wrongful conviction. After reviewing the video below I've concluded that the only charge filed against Jennifer Couture for which she could have been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial by an impartial jury was simple battery. Simple battery is defined as "Actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other" (https://ift.tt/TQiSg6e). Whenever a defendant like Couture is so obviously innocent of the most serious charges (aggravated assault and burglary), the media and internets tend to double down on their efforts to convict the person before they can say a word. In Couture's case, she does not appear to attempt to hit the alleged victim with her vehicle. She backs up her direction briefly while the alleged victim walks out of the way, but not nearly fast enough to hit her. Had she wanted to hit her she would've probably went back and to the left fast instead of just back slow. If that is an attempt to run someone over its one of the worst attempts I've ever seen. She appears to be not guilty of aggravated assault with a weapon. She is not guilty of burglary either. The burglary charge will be addressed later. This leaves simple battery which appears accomplished by trying to take the phone. Simple battery is a misdemeanor. I do recall an associate of Couture posting what appeared to be false accusations against McGibney shortly after the Netflix show came out. I hope that is not why he is Tweeting "They're both extremely violent and love to use deadly force" (https://twitter.com/BulIyville/status/1567614828189028358) because if it is he should knock it off. She might want to talk to a defamation lawyer because backing a car up that slow is not deadly force. The same thing happened to Kyle Rittenhouse. In that case, a self defense argument posted the night of the shooting based on the video evidence resulted in 63,000 visits from Google alone simply because it was one of the first articles posted with his name in the title (see https://ift.tt/0idBPWO). By the end of the day it was buried behind dozens of pages of fake news. Google clearly got that one wrong. Big tech even went as far as suspending other peoples accounts for hate speech just for saying Rittenhouse defended himself. The best chance at getting Rittenhouse convicted was the press and the internet not the evidence. Fortunately it failed that time, but it succeeds enough to make it worth trying to many. Couture was a similar case despite being less vulnerable due to living in a red state. If she were not in Florida I'd say they might have had a chance convicting her of everything simply by convincing people she's a Karen. I'm guessing her decision to plead guilty had more to do with the jury pool being contaminated by internet snitch culture than it did the evidence. You might recognize McGibney a.k.a. Bullyville from TV shows such as The Most Hated Man on the Internet on Netflix or Dr. Phil. In the Netflix case, McGibney bought IsAnyoneUp.com from Hunter Moore for $12,000, redirected it to Bullyville, and claimed victory only to find out Moore just bought a new domain name which he planned to use for the same content. Moore demonstrated a great way to make a quick buck by selling his domain name and buying a new one for $10. That was when Anonymous got involved. Moore made himself fair game for Anonymous by paying a hacker to steal nudes from over 40 women. They hacked just about everything he had and took down his severs, but they also said in a video they'd preserved evidence. Evidence for who? Was it intended for the FBI or just the online community to see for educational value? Anonymous has been investigated by the FBI countless times and many of those investigations predate Hunter Moore (see https://ift.tt/atiIArv). Why would anyone targeted by the FBI ever agree to work with people working with the FBI? It doesn't make any sense. I can't think of a situation bad enough to justify helping the FBI with anything. Anonymous said in a 2013 Tweet, "We openly support any operation that BullyVille launches. Any attack on them is a direct attack on us" (https://twitter.com/YourAnonNews/status/344970511136194560). Was Bullyville already an FBI informant the day that Tweet was made and if so, did Anonymous know about it? I ask because if Anonymous knew of Bullyville's status as an FBI asset they might as well have said they support any operation the FBI launches and any attack on the FBI is an attack on them. This is not an attack on Anonymous or Bullyville. Merely criticism from someone who doesn't like finding excuses to send people to prison. I don't think most people in prison deserve to be there. One reason they're there is because of overcharging. Overcharging is one of the worst forms of bullying there is. Few things are more intimidating than the state threatening to put you in prison if you don't plead guilty to crimes you didn't commit. Unless you are obviously innocent of everything you almost always have to take the offer. Not taking the offer exposes you to at worst being convicted of everything and sent to prison or at best only being found guilty of what you actually did and having to go into sentencing with the state seeking the maximum. Some might say taking any deal offering probation would be a good idea under those circumstances, but not with serial snitches like McGibney's friends after her. She's far too likely to be targeted by gang stalkers eager to report any little thing to her probation officer. If ever convicted of another felony her sentence will be based on the history she now has. She can't argue she wasn't actually guilty of those prior offenses at that point. Lots of people are in prison due to pleading guilty to stuff they didn't technically do thinking it was no big deal because the state offered probation. Then they get caught doing something less serious and would have gotten probation had it not been for a prior felony. Under Johnson vs. United States (https://ift.tt/p6BZo0E) the Supreme Court ruled that burglaries of unoccupied dwellings are not categorically violent offenses while burglaries of occupied dwellings are. That decision was used to strike down the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act as being too vague because its language covered too many non-violent offenses. The court recognized the difference between coming home to find your home broken into versus being the victim of a home invasion. How Johnson would apply to Couture is not exactly clear because the term "occupied conveyance" was used in her case while "occupied dwelling" is the term reviewed by SCOTUS. The word "conveyance" is not defined in the statute. If a vehicle can be a "conveyance" they really need to use the word vehicle in the statute. This vagueness could be grounds to challenge the Florida burglary statue because the word "conveyance" doesn't put reasonable people of average intelligence on notice of what's prohibited. I'm an educated man of superior intelligence and I still don't know what they mean by it after having read definitions of the word in the dictionary. The word "conveyance" is defined by Merriam-Webster as "the action of conveying" (https://ift.tt/P57evMR) which cannot possibly be used to describe a vehicle because a vehicle cannot possibly be an "action" of anything. A vehicle is an object not an act, so I don't see how you could ever accurately describe a vehicle as a conveyance. Florida's burglary statute is unconstitutionally vague in part due to using the word "conveyance" which can only accurately describe an act like driving not an object like a car. Conveyance describes the act of using a vehicle to transport anything from one place to another, but it cannot possibly describe a vehicle itself. Sure enough, the Florida statutes define "conveyance" inaccurately as to include "any motor vehicle, ship, vessel, railroad vehicle or car, trailer, aircraft, or sleeping car" (https://ift.tt/Um3pwyJ). The alleged victim was clearly in the process of parking and leaving the car when Couture reached inside. Reaching inside a window cannot possibly be considered the same as breaking and entering. Think of when you leave a front window slightly open at your home and imagine someone reaching through but not trying to actually go through it or otherwise enter your home. That is not a burglary and neither was this. If this were burglary then all you'd have to do to make a burglar is turn off your engine, tell your passengers to leave, and call the police if they don't. That conduct might belong in a trespassing statute but not a burglary statute. You see the problem here? One second someone refusing to leave a vehicle is not a burglar, but the second the driver turns off the engine they're a burglar. The word "conveyance" means the act of transporting, so the state could never accurately describe a sleeping car as being engaged in such an act let alone an act itself. Conclusion James McGibney a.k.a. Bullyville appears committed to getting people kidnapped by the government. Approach with caution. If his show contacts you and doesn't consider you a "victim" there is a good chance they will try to get you kidnapped by the government. I hope that he limits his efforts to just those truly beyond redemption and doesn't broaden his efforts to include those whose only offense is being friends or business associates of his enemies. Hiring someone who's threatened someone is not the same as threatening someone. #bullyville #jamesmcgibney #fbi #anonymous #famoussnitches
Would you like to know if your prison consultant is a prison rat? I sure would which is why after posting an article about a prison consultant being a prison rat, I decided to look into other prison consultants to see if they have bad paperwork as well. Turns out the last guy I wrote about isn't the only and likely far from the last prison consultant with a snitch card. Justin Paperny of White Collar Advice (https://ift.tt/zgpVskf) and Prison Professors (https://ift.tt/Dzjp3sx) also has a snitch card on his docket sheet. When I searched Google for "prison consultant" I quickly discovered an article by The New York Times about the prison consulting industry. The featured image is a photo of Justin Paperny (https://ift.tt/l8qR0Pi). I decided to check the docket sheet from United States vs. Justin Paperny (https://ift.tt/XMS095s) for any evidence of cooperation with the government. Document 44 titled "SEALED DOCUMENT - Government's POSITION PAPER; MOTION Pursuant to USSG 5K1.1. (ad) (Entered: 04/03/2008)" should contain a full copy of Paperny's snitch card. Unfortunately, the document is sealed so even if you order a copy on PACER all you get is a single page calling it a sealed document. While I'm not sure exactly why it was sealed, I wouldn't be surprised if burying evidence of Paperny cooperating with the government has something to do with it. If that was the case, the prosecutor messed up by titling the filing in a way that gives it away as a snitch card. Motions filed under USSG 5K1.1 can only be made by the government and require a statement "that the defendant has provided substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of another person" (https://ift.tt/R0Kyo76). The exact nature of Paperny's assistance to the government remains unknown, but his plea offers some insight (see PDF link above map). Paragraph 16 states, "Defendant further agrees to cooperate fully with the USAO, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and, as directed by the USAO, with any other federal, state, or local or foreign law enforcement or regulatory agency." Such cooperation required Paperny to "Respond truthfully and completely to all questions that may be put to defendant, whether in interviews, before a grand jury, or at any trial or other court proceeding." The government agreed to file a motion for downward departure if Paperny fulfilled his obligations under Paragraph 16. Paperny's judgement and commitment order says he received just an 18 month sentence. That sentence is consistent with the bottom end of the guideline range for a defendant with a criminal history category of I and a total offense level of 15 (https://ift.tt/cWhSnad). His plea agreement listed his total offense level as 25 but left open the option for the government to seek a downward departure should Paperny make good on his agreement to cooperate. The recommended sentencing range for someone with a base offense level of 25 and a criminal history category of I is 57-71 months. Paperny could not have gotten just 18 months without a downward departure in addition to those used to calculate the guidelines in his plea agreement unless the judge decided to depart for some reason other than the government requesting one. The sentencing transcript is not available. If somebody agrees to cooperate with law enforcement in their plea agreement, has an entry on their docket sheet from a downward departure motion filed by the government, and receives a sentence significantly lower than their applicable guideline range then they're a rat. People can explain lower sentences as being the result of countless things other than snitching, but not when the lower sentence is accompanied by an agreement to cooperate followed by a motion by the government which requires a statement saying substantial assistance was provided. If Mr. Paperny disagrees with my conclusion he is welcome to send me an unredacted copy of either the government's motion for a downward departure under 5K1.1 or his presentence report. #justinpaperny #prisonconsultants #whitecollaradvice