The cesspool of hypocrites that is Portland, Oregon is on full display right now at the Multnomah County Courthouse. On the right you have self proclaimed Proud Boy Alan James Swinney who came to Oregon to show support for law and order by engaging in a series of crimes. On the left you have Antifa whose activists claim to support abolishing the police only to support the police the second they claim to have been attacked by anyone from the alt-right. We at Cop Blaster do not identify with the right or the left, so we don't have a problem calling out either side for being the hypocrites that they are. We hate the government and those that enforce its laws, so we support anyone that fights the police not matter who they are which is why we have been so supportive of groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter over the past year or so. It is also why we defend people like Jeremy Christian when the state decides to over prosecute them for political reasons (https://ift.tt/34abvg3). If society is to have any chance at having a justice system that is truly fair we cannot allow political biases to play a role. If we allow white supremacists to be prosecuted more severely than anyone else then that system has the potential to prosecute anyone unfairly for any reason. If Antifa activists go to a conservative community what is to stop a jury in that area from sentencing them excessively because they don't like Antifa if they use the same system that allows liberals to sentence white supremacists excessively? We have spoken out against the state's case against Swinney because we don't believe that he committed the crime of second degree assault due to him not causing anyone serious injuries (https://ift.tt/3jjHOyV). The worst injuries Swinney is alleged to have inflicted are bruises from paintballs and the closest thing to a weapon that he used to inflict injuries were paintball guns. We don't consider bruises to be serious injuries even if they are as bad as these self proclaimed victims allege and we don't consider any paintball gun loaded with paintballs to be a dangerous weapon under the law. Swinney is also accused of spraying people with bear mace, but even an eyeball full of mace does not rise to the level of injury necessary to sustain a charge of assault II under Oregon law. The prosecution's best shot at a conviction on the most serious charges in this case is similar to how they wrongfully convicted Jeremy Christian of murder last year. In that case Christian was assaulted on a Max train by an Antifa activist and defended himself. Christian suffers from autism and PTSD. He has difficulty controlling himself during his autistic meltdowns and has heightened threat sensitivity due to PTSD from among other things being shot in the face. This author knows this due to living in the cell next to him for three months. That dual diagnosis proved deadly for two men one of which Christian was understandably afraid of due to being thrown on the ground multiple times by another man. We argued that Christian should have been found not guilty by reason of self defense for the first two stabbings and guilty of manslaughter for the third one. The third stabbing was of a man that Christian himself admitted had done nothing to him other than stand in the wrong place when he was running on "auto pilot." Christian's version of events were consistent with a person with his dual diagnosis acting before having time to properly process things which we thought lowered his culpable mental state enough to justify a finding of manslaughter. The prosecution was able to convict Christian of murder by making the case about social justice. If you can convince a liberal jury that a defendant is a white supremacist then they will almost always convict him of as many things they can. The government is doing the same thing in this case. They will convict Swinney of being a Proud Boy, convince the jury that Proud Boys are white supremacists, and seek a remedy based not on what is just, but rather what most people in the community would consider justice to be. The prosecution has a long line of leftist snitches eager to testify in this case many of whom took to the streets to protest law enforcement. They seem to think that it is ok to be a snitch if the person they're snitching on is alt-right or claims to support law enforcement. They don't seem to realize that what constitutes a snitch is never something that can be debated. Convicts are the only people that get to decide what constitutes a snitch and with that decision made long ago was a prohibition on ever being able to debate the definition again. One cannot accurately deny being a snitch by claiming to be a victim, saying "but he's a Nazi," or asking their friends if they think testifying is ok. Now that we've made it clear that it is impossible to testify against Alan Swinney without admitting to being a snitch, here is a list of snitches we know about so far: Jason Allen Britton Age: 31 Gender: Male Race: White Height: 5 ft 7 in Weight: 160 lbs Hair: Brown Eyes: Brown Phone: 309-738-7946 Email: jaceb79[at]gmail.com Address: 555 NE CENTURION CT, GRESHAM, OR 97030 Facebook: https://ift.tt/2Ws6dfl - Testified that he was shot with a paintball gun near his left eye and that his vision has never been the same. An obvious exaggeration by someone who realizes that without any protracted impairment of his vision there would be no Assault II argument. Seems like a total pansy crying to a jury instead of sucking it up like a real man. He strikes us like the type of set up artist that groups like Anitfa teach how to file charges against people. The end result tends to be accusations that if believed by a jury would constitute a higher charge, but ultimately cannot be proven. Accusations like claiming his vision has never been the same without any proof. Britton posted about this on Facebook where he identifies as an independent "journalist" associated with Antifa (https://ift.tt/39QRJsA). As you can see from his picture (above) his black eye didn't look any worse than one would expect from getting punched hard. He claims to have been wrongfully arrested on multiple occasions, so he's had chances on the inside to figure out that turning state's witness makes someone no better than a cop and still he thinks it is ok to testify against people. Maybe the next time he gets arrested someone will have the presence of mind to teach him. Megan Steward a.k.a. Meg McLain Address: 19650 SE BORGES RD, DAMASCUS, OR Email: meg.mclain[at]gmail.com - Claims to have been sprayed with bear mace and shot with a paintball gun. Currently suing Swinney which obviously gives her all the motivation she needs to exaggerate. When doing a background check on her we discovered the above address, but also a voting registration record from 2013 listing her as a Republican. We added a screenshot of that record (above). It was from the same background check result that matched the email address with the Twitter account https://twitter.com/MegMcLain. Learn more at https://ift.tt/3juO1Ir Brittany Correll - Claims to have witnessed Swinney's actions. Many Others - See many others documented at https://ift.tt/3j6l4lr We will continue to expand this list as we learn the identities of other snitches in this case. If anyone is thinking that the above might violate Oregon's new anti-doxing law they just might be correct if our motive were malicious which it is not, but that probably won't stop somebody from alleging so someday. If it were it wouldn't matter because the language of the bill is unconstitutionally overbroad. We have been hoping that someone might come along and give us standing to challenge it in federal court, but we have yet to get so much as a litigious threat despite not allowing the bill to change how we operate. If any of these people want to give us standing to challenge that bill and the publicity that would come with being the ones to get it overturned then they are by all means encouraged to contact us. They might want to see about making it a class action by contacting every member of the State House (https://ift.tt/2R5PMCt) and State Senate (https://ift.tt/3AbjabM) that voted for HB 3047. Even if the bill were not unconstitutional this website is hosted overseas, so U.S. courts lack the jurisdiction necessary to overrule us on content management issues anyway. Conclusion Alan Swinney didn't do the right thing and he is not a totally innocent person, but he is not guilty of any felonies. He should be convicted of misdemeanor assault and menacing. He has been locked up for over a year which is the maximum sentence allowed by law for misdemeanors, so his sentence should be time served. By dragging this out the state has already cost him the opportunity to earn good conduct time which would have cut months off his sentence had excessive bail not been imposed. #alanswinney #proudboys #antifa #victimhoodculture #jasonbrittonsource https://copblaster.com/blast/40697/portlands-hypocrisy-on-display-at-alan-swinney-trial
Fakest person in Laporte. Will rip off anyone, talk shit about anyone. Robs left and right. Never trust this dirtbag #snitchfakedrugdealer
Nigel Dion Ortiz. Been arrested for everything from burglary-slangin. Been busted with meth, coke, couple Gs, hf pound of green and a scale all while on probation and still never seen the inside of the big wall. All this in a town that send mfers away for seeds and stems when on probation. No matter what Nigel does nigel never gets time. None of his Lawyers are anything. Never see Steve Snyder or Joseph Nugent or Elizabeth Flynn on his court info. He goes in with Public Defenders and gets out like hes got John Gotti's lawyer. Nigel has admitted to his friends to working with the detectives and trying to get his friends and baby mama Shiane Conley to help him think of someone to set up. Nigel has bragged to people about turning people in to get himself out of trouble. Him and his whole family a bunch of fuckboy punks Nigel Dion Ortiz, Dion Jr Ortiz, and Cody Shmidt. His cousin Cody called the Cops on my best friend when they came to fight when cody was talking shit! Fuckin LP RATS #nigeltherat #pabloortiz #nigelcodydion #theratpack
Rob Rezzardi wore a wire on his cousins boyfriend for Cocaine back in 2007 to get himself out of a possession charge. Since 2007 Robs mother and father moved him to Three oaks Michigan where Mr. Rezzardi livIng out his life continuing his old habit of SNITCHING on anyone that upsets the little RAT. He has a failed handy man service out of Three oaks michigan. BEWARE OF THE FATTEST RAT OF THEM ALL RIZZO THE YOUTUBE TAUGHT HANDYMAN #robrezzardi #robberthenryrezzardi #callrizzo
A Dallas man was arrested Saturday night in San Antonio on federal criminal charges due to his alleged involvement in smuggling a large group of migrants. Saturday evening, police began searching for several individuals believed to be migrants who fled on foot from the back of a truck stop on the city's northeast side. forteen people were found at the scene and were detained by Homeland Security Investigations Special Agents. According to the United States Department of Justice, 23-Year-old Jimmy Garcia was arrested after many called 911 to report seeing multiple people inside the back of a black truck #gangs#drugs#news
Federal agents arrested several alleged members of a new gang called "YND" = "Young And Dangerous" Monday on charges that they were trafficking methamphetamines and marijuana in San Antonio and Austin and Houston. More than 6 members or associates of the gang were targeted as part of a joint yearlong investigation involving the U.S. Drug #gangs#news#drugs#killers#stealing#operanews#foxnews
This person sets people up with task force. His girlfriend does the same. They make up lies, fake police reports to take attention off of themselves. They have had close friends kicked in, arrested. He is a scam artist and thief. #copcallerhashadmanysuccessfulkickinsandstops
A pro-se lawsuit filed against Multnomah County, the Multnomah County Sheriff's Office (MCSO), several MCSO deputies, and members of the Multnomah County Detention Center (MCDC) medical staff has survived the first part of a bifurcated summary judgement phase largely intact. CopBlaster.com founder Cyrus Sullivan filed the lawsuit in 2019 for excessive force, assault & battery, deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, negligence, and defamation for conduct the occurred in 2017. Multnomah County moved for summary judgement in an effort to dismiss all of Sullivan's claims last year, but United States District Judge Jennifer Zipps didn't rule on the motion until yesterday. Zipps granted the motion in part and denied it in part. Claims Not Dismissed The claims that survived include claims of excessive force against two deputies; assault & battery against Multnomah County for the conduct of their deputies; deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Multnomah County and Sheriff Mike Reese based on a custom of failing to allow detainees to attend outside medical appointments when scheduling conflicts with court dates; not allowing inmates to have hard braces; and state law negligence claims based on inadequate medical care against Multnomah County. Sullivan won a major victory by convincing Judge Zipps that the Fourteenth Amendment standard of review applies to excessive force claims brought by detainees awaiting sentencing after being found guilty of violating supervised release conditions. That is because even after a federal defendant is found to have violated a condition of supervision it is still within the court's discretion not to revoke supervised release, so until that person is sentenced they are the equivalent of a pre-trial detainee and not a sentenced inmate. Multnomah County argued that because Sullivan had been convicted of a crime, was serving a sentence of supervised release, and was being held in connection with that conviction that the more stringent requirements of the Eighth Amendment's cruel and unusual punishments clause applies. Under the Eight Amendment Sullivan would have to prove that deputies used force maliciously and sadistically for the purpose of causing harm, but under the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause he only needs to show that their use of force was objectively unreasonable. Sullivan maintains that the use of force would still violate the Eighth Amendment because Deputy Timothy Barker intentionally broke his left arm for the purpose of inflicting pain in retaliation for Sullivan's prior conduct. However, under the Fourteenth Amendment Sullivan does not need to prove Barker's intent, just that Barker's act of twisting his left arm away from his body so hard that his left humerus snapped in half was objectively unreasonable under the circumstances. The action was unreasonable because at that point Sullivan was laying face down on a mattress, was not resisting at all, was not in a position to resist at all even if he wanted to, and even if he were resisting Barker and Sgt. Matthew Ingram had Sullivan under control. They had him under so much control due in part to putting all of their body weight on his body to the point that he had difficulty breathing and was quoted by deputies as saying "I can't breathe." A defenseless prisoner with two grown men on top of him is not a threat capable of justifying pulling his arm away from his body hard enough to break it. Even if Sullivan had tried to resist when Barker uncuffed his hand such force would not have been reasonable. The force is therefore excessive under the Fourteenth Amendment and the resulting pain amounts to a punishment without due process of law. Under Oregon state law, Multnomah County is liable for assault and battery committed by correctional officers. For that reason Judge Zipps dismissed the assault and battery claims against every defendant except Multnomah County. This is good news for Sullivan because it means the county as a municipality could be held liable instead of private individuals should Sullivan prevail at trial. Under the Fourteenth Amendment, Multnomah County is liable if an inmate suffers injury due to a policy or custom. Pain is a form of injury, so if a county policy or custom caused Sullivan to experience significantly more pain while recovering than he otherwise would have then they are liable for the additional pain. In this case the county has a custom of cancelling outside medical appointments if the inmate is scheduled to appear in court on the same day. As a result, Sullivan was not taken back to the hospital for a follow-up appointment until five weeks after his arm was broken instead of one week as requested by the hospital. During that time every follow-up appointment scheduled by the jail conflicted with a court date, so jail staff chose to take him to court instead. When he finally did get to the hospital, the deputies that escorted him there refused to allow his doctor to give him a sarmiento brace. A sarmiento brace is a hard plastic brace designed to immobilize fractured humerus bones (https://ift.tt/3Ezmznw). Deputies claimed that a small metal component made the brace a safety risk, so the best they would allow him to have was a sling. Sullivan later learned from his doctor that had he been given a sarmiento brace the week after his injury that his pain would have been significantly less due to the bones not moving around. Judge Zipps is now giving Sullivan the opportunity to solicit expert testimony to show that his recovery would have been significantly less painful if it were not for county policies prioritizing court appearances over medical appointments and not allowing inmates with broken arms to wear hard plastic braces. Under Oregon state law, Multnomah County is liable for medical negligence if "the County medical staff did not meet the applicable standard of care exercised by a reasonably careful medical professional with like training and expertise in the community." Sullivan believes that he can meet this burden due to medical staff failing to provide him with the level of care that the hospital claims they would have provided had he been taken back there on time. The medical staff at MCDC should have provided Sullivan with a hard plastic brace without any metal parts no later than a week after his injury. We did a Google search for "sarmiento brace" and found results on the first page that don't appear to have any metal components (https://ift.tt/3zmgcAu). Multnomah County was negligent in this case for failing to stock sarmiento braces for inmates that suffer broken arms and not ordering one for Sullivan after his arm was broken. Claims Dismissed Judge Zipps dismissed several claims against Multnomah County and dismissed most of the defendants from the claims that survived. Sullivan's claim of excessive force against Multnomah County and supervising staff members; using force to conduct a strip search without giving Sullivan an opportunity to comply voluntarily; failing to intervene; failing to prescribe stronger pain medication; defamation and claims against individuals personally involved in making treatment decisions were all dismissed. Zipps ruled that Sullivan failed to show that a reasonable jury could have concluded that a county policy or custom was the moving force behind his excessive force claim. For that reason she dismissed excessive force claims against Multnomah County and supervising MCSO staff members which leaves deputies Barker and Ingram as the only defendants in the Fourteenth Amendment excessive force case. We are disturbed by Judge Zipps' ruling regarding the use of force to conduct a strip search without giving Sullivan the opportunity to comply voluntarily. Sullivan compares what happened to tackling a suspect on the street without warning just because you think he will probably resist. Such uses of force are typically considered excessive because suspects are entitled to the opportunity to comply with officers before force can reasonably be used. If an officer tells someone to get on the ground and they try to run that's one thing, but its another to just tackle someone because you think they will probably try to run if asked to get on the ground. Staff used force to take Sullivan to the floor and cut his clothes off using scissors without giving him the opportunity to voluntarily comply with the strip search. Usually when MCDC inmates are placed in disciplinary their cell door is closed, they are asked to strip naked, bend/caught, and pass their clothes through the food slot to receive their jumpsuit. Sullivan was simply taken to the ground and his clothes were cut off. We believe that Sullivan was entitled to the opportunity to cooperate with the strip search and had he been given the opportunity his arm would not have been broken. Sullivan had already stopped resisting before riding the elevator down to the disciplinary unit, so there was no way staff could have known whether or not he would have cooperated with the strip search. Judge Zipps ruled that deputies "were reasonably concerned at that point that Plaintiff was repeatedly not complying with orders and that allowing Plaintiff room to remove his own clothes could pose a threat." Zipps was unpersuaded by 9th Circuit precedent which makes it clear that any use of force to gain compliance with a non-existent order is excessive no matter how reasonable the concern that the inmate would not comply with an order if given the opportunity. See Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021 (9th Cir. 2013), "Officers cannot justify force as necessary for gaining inmate compliance when inmates have been given no order with which to comply." Zipps' decision not to apply Furnace to Sullivan's case torpedoed his failure to intervene claim. Sullivan claimed that other deputies had the opportunity to stop Barker and Ingram for using force to conduct a strip search without giving Sullivan an order to comply with. Had deputies intervened at that point his arm would not have been broken. By refusing to declare the strip search unlawful Judge Zipps could then argue that there was nothing other deputies could do to stop Barker from suddenly twisting Sullivan's arm to its breaking point. When Sullivan returned to MCDC from the hospital he had with him a prescription for oxycodone every six hours. Jail staff immediately reduced that prescription to Norco three times a day because they don't allow inmates to receive anything stronger than Norco and pills are only passed out en-mass three times a day. Sullivan argued that this policy is deliberately indifferent to the serious medical needs of inmates whose pain management needs require stronger medication delivered more frequently. While it is true that Norco significantly reduced Sullivan's pain, we also believe that Sullivan should be given the opportunity to seek expert testimony as to what difference stronger medication taken more regularly would have made. Zipps is already giving him that opportunity with regards to the lack of a sarmiento brace even thought such braces do more to relieve pain than they do to help bones heal straight. Finally, Judge Zipps dismissed all of Sullivan's defamation claims on the grounds that Sullivan failed to file them in a timely manner. Oregon state law has a 1 year statute of limitations on defamation claims which apparently cannot be circumvented by filing suit in federal court where statutes of limitations are typically longer. Even if Sullivan had filed his defamation claim on time it appears that Oregon state law has a loophole that grants immunity to law enforcement officers that make false statements in official reports. The immunity is due to statutory language saying that officials cannot be sued for defamation based on official statements they make as part of their duties and courts have upheld those laws citing the chilling effect that exposing officers to defamation liability would have. They have basically concluded that forcing officers to tell the truth at all times would be such a burden to the courts that society is better off letting them lie as they wish as long as those lies are not made under oath. A total of 15 named defendants were dismissed from the suit entirely. Defendant Multnomah County Sheriff's Office was dismissed because they are a subdivision of Multnomah County so a suit against the county is the same as a suit against them. Sheriff Mike Reese was dismissed in his individual capacity but remains in his official capacity. The other defendants dismissed from the suit are Wendy Muth, Phil Hubert, Paul Simpson, Uwe Pemberton, Timothy Moore, Gary Glaze, Kurtiss Morrison, David Kovachevich, Erica Barker, Michael Seale, Brook Holter, Angelina Platas, and Halcyon Dodd. #multnomahcountyjail #timothybarker #matthewingram #jenniferzipps
Riley Winters is Emma Heart, currently known as St. Ann Police Department Officer Ruby Stinekraus. Your Community publicly-finances a former pornographic actress with over three-hundred (300) performer credits to her name. St. Ann Police Department Officer Ruby Stinekraus is prominently featured by the City as a representative and role-model for the City to 11 year-old children enrolled in the D.A.R.E. Program: her publicly-financed job is to influence 5th-graders. Character evaluations and credibility dilemmas often de-rail otherwise prosecutable cases from your District Attorney when involving complaints and statements provided by an arresting officer. Does the pornographic past of Officer Stinekraus threaten to produce such outcomes? With the power of knowledge now in possession of your Community, an INFORMED decision is now possible by the residents of St. Ann. #pornocop#emmaheart#xxxofficer
We were so blown away by this excellent Disarm the Police sticker from Punk with a Camera that we just ordered 10 of them. Have no idea what we will do with them, but we will certainly be on the lookout for good places to post them. We think they would look great on the back bumper of any patrol car that just happens to be parked by itself. That or on the front doors of a police precinct or other law enforcement property. We will also make sure to offer one to any law enforcement officer we come across and ask if they can think of a good place to stick it. #disarmthepolice #punkwithacamera #stickers
Muscogee County District Attorney Mark Jones was indicted this week on charges of bribery, influencing a witness, violation of oath by a public officer, attempted violation of oath by a public officer, and attempted subordination of perjury. He now faces the possibility of being suspended for the duration of the proceedings, but Georgia law requires that a three man commission be appointed by the governor first. The charges stem from several events that took place this year. They include accusations that Jones attempted to influence the testimony of Corporal Sherman Hayes in July by asking him to tell a grand jury that he thought a murder victim was cheating on the prime suspect for the purpose of establishing motive. That act formed the basis of counts 1-3 of the indictment for influencing a witness, attempted subordination of perjury, and violation of oath by a public officer. In March, Jones is accused of offering Assistant District Attorneys Sheneka Jones Terry and Kimberly Schwartz, $1,000 each to do specific things in or obtain specific results from cases they were working on. Those acts formed the basis of counts 4-7 which included two counts of bribery and two counts of violation of oath by a public officer. Also in March, Jones is accused of using a threat and engaging in misleading conduct to prevent a witness from testifying via a victim impact impact statement. That act formed the basis of counts 8 and 9 of the indictment for influencing a witness and violation of oath by a public officer. Jones was already facing two felony charges at the time of his indictment. Last year while campaigning for District Attorney there was an incident at a civic center during the taping of a campaign video that resulted in one of the charges. We found that video on Facebook in which a rapper is telling people to go out and vote for Mark Jones and it includes aerial footage of cars doing donuts (https://ift.tt/3toa8pI). 'Apparently at least one vehicle was damaged and Jones now faces a felony charge as a result. In 2019, Jones received his second DUI since 2015 and this time he was charged with a felony because the incident involved an accident in which at least one person was injured (https://ift.tt/2AYVJcg). Despite these problems Jones was still qualified to run for office and won because technically they are pending matters that have yet to yield convictions capable of disqualifying someone from running for elected office. According to public records, Mark Preston Jones is a 40 year old resident of Columbus, Georgia. We found an additional arrest record with an accompanying mugshot (see image above) from 2003 for public intoxication (booking number 5103 and prisoner number 03-45285). He also appears to have used the email address markpjones[at]hotmal.com to create social media accounts. #markjones #bribery #shermanhayes #shenekaterry #kimberlyschwartz
Daniel John Smith aka rock n roll aka ratty as s bitch is a rat and a cop caller he just has Lisa Marie Lewis Smith make the calls for him he is a piece of shit #copcaller #snitch
Lisa Marie Lewis Smith will smoke dope and then call the coos and turn you in she has called cthe cops to her home over 40 times beware of her #copcalle #rat #snitch
Arrested for Felony Possession of Heroin. Magistrate posted bond at $7k. Then shortly after bond was changed to secure bond. The defendant often is fearful and has paranoid dillusions about her family needing to go into witness protection. All telltale signs she signed her life away as a CI (Confidential Informant) for Henderson Police. The police also released her with her heroin and paraphernalia. Defendant suffers from methamphetamine induced psychosis where she claims everyone else is an informant. All due to her own inner self guilt and shame. I do not believe it is wrong to get drugs off the streets and sometimes people get stuck in horrible situations where they are corerced into agreeing for their freedom and family. Little do they know the discovery process will reveal them in most cases to the criminal being prosecuted. #tobin #rose #michelle