Derek Chauvin Trial: The Video Says It All

While the whole country has been talking about the trial of Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd, I have remained silent for the most part. While they pick apart the testimony of witnesses and criticize Chauvin's lawyers for not objecting, I cannot help but think that none of it matters. None of it matters because I have seen all that I or anyone else needs to see to know the truth. I have seen the video of Derek Chauvin crushing the life out of George Floyd. That video is embedded below, but due to the graphic nature of the content you will be required to watch it on YouTube. That video is the most disgusting thing that I have ever had the displeasure of watching, but it is something everyone must see for themselves. It takes a certain level of sadism or indifference for a person to grind their knee into a man's neck for several minutes after he loses consciousness. Chauvin is charged with second degree murder because no reasonable person with any regard for human life is capable of doing what he did. Derek Chauvin is clearly guilty AF. #georgefloyd #derekchauvin #blacklivesmatter #murder

source https://copblaster.com/blast/35478/derek-chauvin-trial-the-video-says-it-all

Matt Gaetz Names Donald Gaetz as Wire Wearing FBI Informant

Congressman Matt Gaetz responded to accusations that he sex trafficked an underaged girl by admitting to being snitch and implicating his father as an informant that wore a wire for the FBI in response to his tattling. You can watch highlights from Gaetz' interview with Tucker Carlson in the video embedded below this article in which Fox News summarizes the case. The New York Times recently reported that Rep. Gaetz has been under investigation by the Department of Justice for some time due to allegations that he had an inappropriate relationship with a 17 year old girl and paid for her to travel with him across state lines. Gaetz says that he and his family are the target of a $25,000,000 extortion attempt. Gaetz accuses former federal prosecutor David McGee of sending his father a text message in March of last year demanding a meeting and during that meeting he offered to make the sex trafficking charges disappear for a fee. Gaetz said that he and his family were "so troubled by that, we went to the local FBI." He went on to describe how his father, former Florida State Senate President Donald Gaetz, wore a wire for the FBI and recorded conversations with McGee. The sex trafficking allegations appear to be linked to Gaetz' former political ally Joel Greenberg (https://ift.tt/3ftiSFU). Greenberg was arrested last year on fourteen federal charges including stalking a political opponent, creating fake ids, and sex trafficking a minor. It is not clear how Greenberg and Gaetz know each other or how Greenberg's conduct relates to Gaetz beyond the sex trafficking allegations and an apparent offer from McGee to make it go away. The purpose of this article is not to pass judgment on the legitimacy of the investigation, but only to document the fact that Gaetz and his father are snitches. According to public records, Matthew Louis Gaetz II is a 38 year old Florida native whose information appears to be purged from our background check service's database. We did however find public records for Donald Jay Gaetz, age 73, at the above mentioned address. We are posting that address so that people in the area know to be careful because someone is likely to be wearing a wire, recording their every word, and is liable to report them to the police. We ask that you use it for informational purposes only and do not commit any unlawful acts. If people like the Gaetz' don't like being blasted by our words then perhaps they should be less vindictive and more honorable. The next time someone tries to extort money form them they should just say no and leave it at that if they are not willing to handle the matter like men. Trying to put the other man in prison by crying to the cops is the act of a coward afraid to handle his own business. #mattgaetz #donaldgaetz #davidmcgee #famoussnitches #fbi

source https://copblaster.com/blast/35477/matt-gaetz-names-donald-gaetz-as-wire-wearing-fbi-informant

Lacie Switzer-McSwaine

Read the article. Thats crazy! She set them up. She has been a known informant in Clarion County for a long time. She faced child endangerment due to leaving drugs out for her toddler to get it into, so she made a deal with the police. She got to keep her child, but she had to get some buys on a few people. #didusdirty#thoughtyouweremyfriend#setup#knownrat#betrayed

source https://copblaster.com/blast/35476/lacie-switzer-mcswaine

Ames Officer Jason Eaton Arrested After Drunken High Speed Chase

Ames Police Officer Jason Eaton was arrested early this morning after leading state troopers on a high speed chase down the wrong side of Highway 30. After finally being stopped, Eaton denied being drunk and said that he only had " 1-2 beers" which usually translates to 10-12 beers. He is now charged with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, failure to obey a stop sign, and excessive speeding. The Ames Police Department has suspended Officer Eaton pending the outcome of an internal investigation. According to public records, Jason Wayne Eaton is a 39 year old resident of Story City, Iowa. In 1999 he pled guilty to a charge of issuing a check or draft without sufficient funds or credit. The charge was only an infraction for which he received a deferred sentence with unsupervised probation. See Grand Forks County case number 18-99-K-03631. In 2009 he pled guilty to exceeding the speed limit by 6-10 MPH. In 2002 First National Bank obtained a civil judgment against him of $6,274. He is a registered Republican. #jasoneaton #drunkdriving #dui #speeding

source https://copblaster.com/blast/35475/ames-officer-jason-eaton-arrested-after-drunken-high-speed-chase

Jailing innocent people, 1 after the other, snowden, chelsea manning

Prosecutes the Julian Assange case Ed snowden case And the chelsea manning case. Information on him: George Zachary terwiliger DOB: March 22, 1981 Address: 2717 Sycamore St, Alexandria, Virginia 22305 $1790 VERIFIED HOME ADDRESS! Personal Phone: (703) 472-3461 associated numbers (434) 296-8601 Landline phone by Central Tel Co of Virginia Dba Centurylink (509) 453-5769 Landline phone by Qwest Corporation, two persons associated +1.202.639.6568 (WORK PHONE VERIFIED) 703-472-3999 703-519-1996 703-519-1977 703-472-1999 703-476-1304 509-453-5769 540-364-9622 zterwilligervelaw.com (VERIFIED WORK EMAIL) geo_terhotmail.com : 112233 (Found in an old leak) george.terwilligerhotmail.com geo_termsn.com zachary.terwilliger2usdoj.gov - when looked up in google, many cases can be found that he was in (affidavits, subpeonas etc) geotermsn.com gary7504yahoo.com geo_teraddress.com He was the federal prosecutor for the chelsea manning AND Edward snowden. Completely betrayed his country. #georgeterwilliger #edwardsnowden #julianassange #chelseamanning

source https://copblaster.com/blast/35474/jailing-innocent-people-1-after-the-other-snowden-chelsea-manning

East Cleveland Officer Nicholas Foti Fired for Head Stomp

East Cleveland Police Officer Nicholas Foti was fired for stomping the head of a motorist during a traffic stop nearly a year ago. City officials did not become aware of the incident until they responded to a public records request earlier this month. After the footage was released, Foti was on paid leave pending the outcome of the ECPD's internal investigation. We have embedded the footage taken from the body camera of another officer below. At 1:20 you can see an officer stomp on the suspect's head after he was dragged out of the car and placed on the ground face down with his hands cuffed behind his back. Foti's use of force was unnecessary and excessive. The video below is a trigger for this author because I recently settled a lawsuit against the federal government for excessive force used on me by correctional officers employed by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). In that case I was punched in the head repeatedly while lying face down on the floor with my hands cuffed behind my back. Unlike Foti's victim, I didn't have the benefit of video footage showing the strikes, but I was able present a case based on other things. That case was strong enough to survive the government's summary judgment motion that would have dismissed the case, so they settled with me to avoid the expense of a trial. That experience re-affirmed what I already knew, that just because officers are justified using force at one point does not justify using unnecessary or excessive force later. Kicking this man in the head served no legitimate purpose whatsoever. The force used by the officers to extract a non-compliant motorist appears to have been legitimate, but the need for force ended when the suspect was handcuffed on the ground. Had the victim still been resisting, Foti could have mad an argument that "focused blows" were needed to compel compliance, but even that argument would not justify kicking a man in the head. Foti appears to have simply lost his temper and taken out his frustrations on a helpless detainee. His actions were clearly malicious and he was rightfully fired. Hopefully he will be charged with battery. Other officers used excessive force in this case, but appear to have gone unpunished. At 1:30 an officer can be seen punching the victim while he is on the ground in handcuffs and being tased at the same time. Punching a helpless man in handcuffs is not justified and neither is tasing a handcuffed person. Unfortunately, police departments often sanction the unnecessary use of "focused blows" and tasers on those suspected of being non-compliant. In this case it seems all the victim had to do to earn a tasing was move when told to remain still. According to public records, Nicholas A. Foti is a 36 year old resident of Painesville, Ohio. In 2008 he pled no contest to a misdemeanor charge listed as "falsification" in violation of Ohio statue number 606.10 (https://ift.tt/3cyXahT) and fined $343 (case number 08CRB03380FOTNIC). A civil judgment of $496 was entered against him in Lake County Municipal Court in 2007 (case number CVF0701278). He filed for bankruptcy in 2017. He registered to vote as a Republican in 2004 and his drivers license is suppressed. According to Foti's LinkedIn profile (https://ift.tt/3u6pGNM), he graduated from Willoughby South High School in 2003, attended Cleveland Heights Police Academy in 2012, worked as a Timberlake Police Officer from 2012-2014, worked as a training enforcement officer for the Newburgh Heights Police Department in 2015, and worked for the Geneva on the Lake Police Department. He does not list his employment with the East Cleveland Police Department on his profile, presumably because he has not kept it up to date. #nicholasfoti #assault #bodycam

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34477/east-cleveland-officer-nicholas-foti-fired-for-head-stomp

Dionne Holliday and Kevin Christmon Sued for Abusing 5 Year Old Boy

Montgomery County Police Officers Dionne Holliday and Kevin Christmon are being sued along with the county for their abuse of a 5 year old black boy. The abuse took place last year, but the body camera footage was not released until this past week. We have embedded the full 50 plus minute video below this article. We will be referring to timestamps in that video in our our analysis. To sum it up, Officers Holliday and Christmon put a 5 year old boy in the backseat of a patrol car after the boy left East Silver Springs Elementary School not wanting to go to school anymore, took him back to school, recommended to the boy's mother that she start beating the boy at home to teach him to obey her, and eventually handcuffed the boy as part of what appeared to be a sort of "scared straight" tactic. The video below was taken from the body camera of Officer Kevin Christmon. He begins by yelling at the boy before placing him in the backseat of his patrol car, taking the boy back to school, failing to intervene when Officer Dionne Holliday told the boy's mother to beat her child, encouraging the mother to beat the boy herself, and eventually putting the boy in handcuffs. At 1:00 he starts off asking the boy his age and scolding him "I don't care you don't want to go to school, you don't have that choice." Eventually he puts the boy in his patrol car and drives him back to school. At 39:15 he put the boy in handcuffs. At 48:55 he tells the mother "you can beat your child in Montgomery County, Maryland, just don't leave no cuts or no crazy cigarette burns, or nothing like that we good." Officer Dionne Holliday is the female officer featured in the video below. At 6:39 she can be heard saying "this is why people need to beat their kids." She repeats her belief that parents need to beat their kids several times and conveys that belief to the boy's mother like an instruction. The fact that she stated her opinion and repeated it to the mother like instructions many times show that this was not just a minor slip of the tongue. Holliday clearly believes that parents should beat their children to make them do as they are told. We hope that she does not have kids of her own because she says that she would beat the boy if she were his mother more than once. At 42:38 she says to the boy directly in front of his mother, "I do hope she does beat you when you go home because you deserve it so much for your actions today." At about 30:00 both officers sat down with the boy's mother, Shanta Grant, and spoke to her at length about how to discipline a child. At 31:30 they tried to coach Grant how to beat her son and get away with it. They explained what she can and cannot say to avoid getting into trouble for abusing her son. Their basic message was that she is free to do to her son as she wishes as long as she does not admit doing certain things. It is not appropriate for anyone, let alone uniformed police officers, to encourage anyone to physically abuse children. We identified the officers from court documents which are being uploaded as a PDF with this article. We had scanned several news stories about this in which their names were not present. That is typical in cases like this when journalists don't want to piss off the cops by saying their names. When we were able to Google them we were pleasantly surprised to see a good number of media outlets that did say their names. We just had the misfortune of not stumbling on those articles until after tracking down the court record. We wish more journalists would save us the time and follow suit. According to public records, Dionne Holliday is a 47 year old resident of Silver Springs, Maryland who was charged with bad check larceny in 2008, but those charges were dismissed. In 2012 she was found guilty in absentia for failing to obey a highway sign. In 2002 she was cited for speeding. She is a registered democrat. According to public records, Officer Kevin Darnell Christmon Jr. is a 32 year old resident of Jefferson, Maryland who also owns property in Michigan where he appears to be from. Christmon can be heard at about 24:55 claiming to have been beaten by family members as a child on a regular basis. His only priors are two traffic citations. He appears to be associated with the Grater Harvest Community Development Association. Both officers are still gainfully employed by the MCPD despite an internal investigation. #dionneholliday #kevinchristmon #childabuse #bodycam

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34476/dionne-holliday-and-kevin-christmon-sued-for-abusing-5-year-old-boy

Another Bribe Taken By George Zachary Terwilliger.

https://ift.tt/2NZrsku https://ift.tt/3mawnMl https://ift.tt/3sqdl6N https://ift.tt/2PC5ep2 https://ift.tt/3fl6ojH https://ift.tt/3fq5qCL - PROOF OF HIM BEING FRIENDS WITH TED CRUZ - /////////////////////////////////////////////////////// """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" REPORT HIM TO THE FBI, SEND THIS CASE TO JOURNALISTS DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO GET HIM CONVICTED FOR HIS CRIMES!!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWMtkqz53gI - in this he States multiple times biases including things such as "IT is interesting that she (Chelsea manning) will not answer questions..." "As someone who received the incredible gift of a commutation, literally given 28 years of her life back, [Chelsea Manning] now refuses to simply answer questions as part of our constitutional criminal justice process." according to the US constitution the 5th ammendment is there to prevent the innocent from potential self incriminations, https://ift.tt/3qgMJU4 meaning she is well within her rights to refuse to answer any and all questions, on top of this George Zachary Terwilliger is attempting to persuade the crowd into believing that she is guilty of something simply due to this fact. He is acting as if the fifth ammendment is a pleasure, or a privilege and not a human right because of this he is intentionally misinforming the crowd to simply get her sent to jail and/or portray her as guilty While he does have the right to free speech, his bias and attempt to manipulate the crowd falls under a sixth ammendment violation. the sixth ammendment is meant for everyone to have a "speedy and fair trial" From George Zachary terwilligers claims, and attempted manipulation of the crowd through false allegations and implications he has committed a violation of the sixth ammendment WITH video evidence. If he attempts to take down the video this will be obstruction of justice and thereby obstruction of evidence as well. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By his own logic we can say that if someone does not answer they are automatically guilty. in this case, why has he said nothing about his shell company and money laundering operations? or tax evasion? EVIDENCE OF THESE TAKING PLACE: George Zach Terwilliger - Nickname is usually G. Zach terwilliger or just zach terwilliger. He registered what is known as a "Shell Company" (basically an anonymous company with no employees that only exists for the sole purpose of money transfers and cleaning the dirty money) 2 houses away from him under his alias. The company in queston is named "JOE DAVIS COMPANY, LLC, THE" No other employees of this company exist other than him meaning it has to be a shell company. the only reason for these shell companies to exist is solely for money laundering, on top of this the name in question is incredibly suspicious as he knows nobody by this name "Joe davis" according to publicly available data and no registries of a "Joe davis" exist for this address. Proof: https://ift.tt/3kDEmjU https://ift.tt/3pAw1PN https://ift.tt/3iYtZX6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- He subpeonas any and all doxxes on him in an attempt to suppress any and all bad press regarding him as well as his alleged criminal activity by his own logic, it is interesting. this is an obstruction on free speech, as all information in these doxxes are entirely public therefore no illegal activity took place. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- dishonorable Mentions: Attempted to get Julian assange AND chelsea manning arrested Justified trump firing james comey Justified Ajit Pai's Net neutrality decision prosecuted multiple members of the original doxbin (the .onion version) He once said the Paris attacks in 2015 could've been prevented if "The government had better intelligence gathering and greater surveillance over it's citizens" gterwilligerjmd.doj.gov - was a possible email that was used to suppress a journalist from interviewing him Justified border patrol inhumane tortures, guantanamo bay torture, as well as racial profiling on FOX News with the possibility of MS-13 members crossing the borders Justified government use of seized drug money as well as his father Allegedly has multiple accounts on KKK and white supremacy forums such as Stormfront.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______ ________ ______ ______ __ __ ________ __ __ ________ _______ ______ __ __ | \| \/ \| \ \ | \ | \ \ | \ \ | \ / \| \ | \ | \ \\ \ | \ | | \ \ | | __/ __ | __\ | | \| | | __| __ | | | \\/ | \ | | \ | | \ | | \ | | | > | \ | \ | | \ | | | | | / \ | __/ _____| __| _| _| \ | | | _____ | __/ __/ \\ | \\ \ \ | | | \ | \ | \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ ________ __ __ _______ ________ __ __ ________ ______ ______ _______ _______ __ __ _______ ________ ______ ______ __ __ | \ \ | \ \ | \ \ | \ \ / \ / \| \| \| \ | \ \| \ \/ \| \ | \ | \ | \ \ | | \ \ \ \ | \\\ \ \ | | __ | \| | | | __| __ | \ | __| __| | __/ | | | | \| | \ | \ | | | \ | | | | | | | | \ | | \ | | | | __| | \ \ | | | | | \ | _____| \ __/ | | | _____ | __/ \ __/ | | __/ | _| _| __/ \ | \ \ | | | \ \ \ | | \ | | \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// George Zachary terwiliger DOB: March 22, 1981 2717 Sycamore St, Alexandria, Virginia 22305 $1790 VERIFIED HOME ADDRESS! Personal phone: (703) 472-3461 https://ift.tt/3lX6gIq - PROOF it's his personal Cellphone zterwilligervelaw.com (VERIFIED WORK EMAIL) ----------------------------------------------------- | | - Cell carrier and ISP - | | Verizon | | | Verizon Wireless:6006 - SVR/2 | | ANNETERWILLIGERGMAIL.com | | (703) 472-3461 - PHONE REGISTERED TO CARRIER | | ----------------------------------------------------- https://ift.tt/3dizvSh (works for these pricks now) MONEY LAUNDERING ADDRESS = 2719 Sycamore St, Alexandria, Virginia 22305 WORK LOCATION: 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20037 POSSIBLE TWITTER: gterwillig emails: geo_terhotmail.com : 112233 (Found in an old leak) george.terwilligerhotmail.com geo_termsn.com zachary.terwilliger2usdoj.gov - when looked up in google, many cases can be found that he was in (affidavits, subpeonas etc) geotermsn.com gary7504yahoo.com geo_teraddress.com dwaylettenvironcorp.com billjess58hotmail.com zterwilligervelaw.com - put on his work page (VERIFIED NEW WORK EMAIL) - Microsoft login/outlook and hotmail PERSONAL PHONE: (703) 472-3461 - carrier - verizon wireless (Mobile number - VERIFIED!) associated numbers (434) 296-8601 Landline phone by Central Tel Co of Virginia Dba Centurylink (509) 453-5769 Landline phone by Qwest Corporation, two persons associated +1.202.639.6568 (WORK PHONE VERIFIED) 703-472-3999 703-519-1996 703-519-1977 703-472-1999 703-476-1304 509-453-5769 540-364-9622 FAX: +1.202.879.8967 NEARBY POLICE: tips.fbi.gov 703-746-4444 - local police department Baltimore FBI field office - (410) 265-8080 Phone: (804) 674-2000 Fax: (804) 674-2936 - state police of virginia (800) 552-7096 - virginia Child protective services former addresses 11017 Pleasant Vale Rd, Delaplane, VA 20144, lived here in 2010 - 2014 $1,280 532 E Nelson Ave, Alexandria, VA 22301, lived here in 2009 $1,790 714 Potomac St, Alexandria, VA 22314, lived here in 2008 $2,540 6515 Collins Ave #1505, Miami Beach, FL 33141, lived here in 2007 $1,840 305 S Royal St, Alexandria, VA 22314, lived here in 2005 $2,540 7 University Ct, Charlottesville, VA 22903, lived here in 2003 $1,280 159 Madison Ln, Charlottesville, VA 22903, lived here in 2002 $1,280 3202 Pommel Ct, Oakton, VA 22124, lived here in 2000 - 2005 all residence at his house: James P Crowe (703) 739-4494 Megan J Crowe (703) 739-4494 Lawrence R Hoese (703) 548-3765 Anne Terwilliger Age 40 (757) 812-2810 G Z Terwilliger Age 39 (434) 296-8601 historical relations: 7 University Ct, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA May 2003 Michael W Cleary 3202 Pommel Ct, Oakton, VA 22124, USA Jul 2005 Aug 2005 George J Terwilliger Education: William & Mary School of Law, J.D., 2007 (Order of the Coif) University of Virginia, B.A., 2003 Former Jobs: Associate Deputy Attorney General & Chief of Staff, United States Department of Justice, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, Jan. 2017 Jun. 2018 Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, Sep. 2008 Jan. 2017 Counselor to the United States Attorney, United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, Apr. 2013 Nov. 2013 Majority Counsel (Assistant United States Attorney, Detail), United States Senate Judiciary Committee, Office of the Chairman, Sep. 2015 Sep. 2016 Adjunct Professor, Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, 2015 Jan. 2018 Law Clerk to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 2007 Sep. 2008 United States Attorney, United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, June. 2018 January 2021 CRIMINAL RECORDS: IMPROPER UNSAFE PROHIBITED U-TURN (60) Education: University of Virginia (Bachelor of Arts) & College of William and Mary (Juris Doctor) Twitter: https://twitter.com/usaterwilliger?lang=en Wikipedia: https://ift.tt/2uyDROy Charge: IMPROPER UNSAFE PROHIBITED U-TURN (60) Record Date: UNKNOWN Full Name: George Zachary Terwilliger Age: 39 DOB: March, 1981 County Name: Alexandria County Address: 532 E Nelson Ave, Alexandria, VA 22301 Source: FLORIDA_COLLIER_CLERK_OF_COURTS Offense Description: IMPROPER UNSAFE PROHIBITED U-TURN (60) Offense Code: 316.1515 Offense Date: 07 April 2012 Arresting Agency: COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE Case Number: 11-2012-TR-013467-0001-XX Disposition: UNKNOWN Disposition Date: 16 April 2012 IMPROPER UNSAFE PROHIBITED U-TURN (60) Charge: IMPROPER UNSAFE PROHIBITED U-TURN (60) Record Date: UNKNOWN Full Name: George Zachary Terwilliger Age: 39 DOB: March, 1981 County Name: Alexandria County Address: 532 E Nelson Ave, Alexandria, VA 22301 Source: FLORIDA_COLLIER_TRAFFIC Offense Description: IMPROPER UNSAFE PROHIBITED U-TURN (60) Offense Code: 316.1515 Offense Date: 07 April 2012 Arresting Agency: COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE Case Number11-2012-TR-013467-0001-XX Disposition: PAID CIVIL PENALTY Disposition Date: 16 April 2012 ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// RELATIVES ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- wife: Anne greenfield terwiliger DOB: 18-02-1980 PERSONAL PHONE NUMBER - (757) 812-2810 Ethnicity: Caucasian Religion: Christian Income: $150 - $174,999 Net Worth: $100,000 - $249,999 Automobiles Year: 2010 Make: SUBARU Model: OUTBACK Address: Current address: 2717 Sycamore St, Alexandria, VA 22305 $1790 Former addresses: 532 E Nelson Ave, Alexandria, VA 22301, lived here in 2009 $1,790 714 Potomac St, Alexandria, VA 22314, lived here in 2008 $2,540 6515 Collins Ave #1505, Miami Beach, FL 33141, lived here in 2007 - 2008 $1,840 5103 Columbia Rd, Columbia, MD 21044, lived here in 2006 $1,920 10422 Fair Oaks Dr, Columbia, MD 21044, lived here in 2001 - 2002 $1,920 10 University Cir #14, Charlottesville, VA 22903, lived here in 1999 $1,280 10 University Cir, Charlottesville, VA 22903, lived here in 1999 $1,280 10437 Schoolmaster Pl, Columbia, MD 21044, lived here in 1997 - 2001 phones: (757) 812-2810 Cellphone by Cellco Partnership Dba Verizon Wireless Va (410) 964-0306 Landline phone by Verizon Maryland Inc, three persons associated (410) 997-1853 Landline phone by Verizon Maryland Inc, three persons associated (434) 293-4748 Landline phone by Central Tel Co of Virginia Dba Centurylink, three persons associated 410-934-2734 703-472-3999 EDUCATION: School: ATHOLTON HIGH SCHOOL City: COLUMBIA, MD Grad: 1998 emails: green2004aol.com anneterwilligerbellsouth.net ANNETERWILLIGERGMAIL.com annepannaol.com green2004gmail.com green2004usa.net ****virginia.edu - IN PROGRESS FORMER CLASSMATES: aaron ricks 40 FULTON MD aaron ricks, 40fulton, MD sharon merica 41 WALKERSVILLE MD sharon merica, 41walkersville, MD kenechukwu onochie 39 DHS MD kenechukwu onochie, 39dhs, MD richard parlette 40 FULTON MD richard parlette, 40fulton, MD alisha banks 40 REISTERSTOWN MD alisha banks, 40reisterstown, MD lauren roth 40 POTOMAC MD lauren roth, 40potomac, MD erica haynes 57 HICKORY NC erica haynes, 57hickory, NC david scimonelli 41 MIAMI FL david scimonelli, 41miami, FL julie arenas 43 STATEN ISLAND NY julie arenas, 43staten island, NY laura askin 40 LOS ANGELES CA laura askin, 40los angeles, CA lana grigoriev 40 CLARKSBORO NJ lana grigoriev, 40clarksboro, NJ parker kuncl 40 SEATTLE WA parker kuncl, 40seattle, WA heather schueneman 35 EUREKA CA heather schueneman, 35eureka, CA kamesha moore 40 LAUREL MD kamesha moore, 40laurel, MD shonte wicks 41 LAUREL MD shonte wicks, 41laurel, MD elizabeth gaeta 40 GAINESVILLE VA elizabeth gaeta, 40gainesville, VA jessica heltibridle 42 LITHIA FL jessica heltibridle, 42lithia, FL christine canard 41 PASADENA CA christine canard, 41pasadena, CA natalie stewart 38 STERLINGTON LA natalie stewart, 38sterlington, LA //////////////////////////////////////////////////// Relatives: James Greenfield 6420 Autumn Sky Way, Columbia, MD 21044 10/29/1942 Past Addresses: 134 Ball Rd,Old Forge, NY 13420 Po Box 999,Columbia, MD 21044 10437 Schoolmaster Pl,Columbia, MD 21044 EMAILS - IN PROGRESS ****comcast.net ****columbiabuildersinc.com ****columbiabuildersinc.com Byron J Greenfield (410) 531-1028 Landline phone by Verizon Maryland, Inc, three persons associated (410) 531-4834 Landline phone by Verizon Maryland, Inc, four persons associated (410) 935-3014 Cellphone by Cellco Partnership, three persons associated 6420 Autumn Sky Way, Columbia, MD 21044 JIM GREENFIELD (410) 935-3014 Cellphone by Cellco Partnership, three persons associated (410) 531-1028 Landline phone by Verizon Maryland, Inc, three persons associated (410) 531-4834 Landline phone by Verizon Maryland, Inc, four persons associated Michele M Greenfield /////////////////////////////////////////////////// #briberyhorribledisgusting

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34475/another-bribe-taken-by-george-zachary-terwilliger

OKC Officer Kristopher Gellenbeck Arrested for Domestic Violence

Oklahoma City Police Officer Kristopher Gellenbeck was arrested last night on charges of domestic assault and battery. The alleged victim is Gellenbeck's wife. Gellenbeck has been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the case. He is a sergeant whose been with the Oklahoma City Police Department for over 7 years. According to public records, Kristopher Mark Gellenbeck is a 38 year old resident of Oklahoma City. His only prior is a 2004 ticked for failing to wear a seatbelt. He is a registered Republican with possible ties to Gellenbeck Fine Homes LLC in Bethany. Email addresses possibly used by him include kgellenbeck[at]yahoo.com and kgellebeck[a]bellsouth.net. #kristophergellenbeck #domesticviolence #assault

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34474/okc-officer-kristopher-gellenbeck-arrested-for-domestic-violence

Sauk-Suiattle Officer Leventine Hall Arrested for Drunken Threats

Sauk-Suiattle Tribal Officer Leventine Hall was arrested earlier this week for threatening people with a loaded weapon outside of a bar in Burlington. According to the mainstream media, employees called police to report an armed man outside the bar making threats. They reported that two patrons had gotten into a physical altercation outside the bar and Hall was knocked to the ground when trying to separate them. Hall then walked to his car, got a gun, and threatened the men. Hall is charged with one count of harassment with a weapon enhancement. His bail was set at $25,000, he quickly posted bail, and was released. According to public records, Leventine James Hall is a 29 year old resident of Bellingham whose only prior run-ins with the law have been traffic citations. #leventinehall #harassment #threats #drunks

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34473/sauk-suiattle-officer-leventine-hall-arrested-for-drunken-threats

Sacramento Officer Daniel Donahue Arrested for Sexting Minor

Sacramento Police Officer Daniel Donahue was arrested yesterday for sexting a 15 year old girl he met through an app called Hoop linked to Snapchat. The girl's family reported Officer Donahue to the SPD earlier this months and he resigned soon afterwards. He is currently charged with "inappropriate communications with a minor" according to media reports. He was booked into the Sacramento County Jail and later released. According to media reports, Donahue sent the girl hundreds of text messages. Some of those messages included nude photos of himself and requests that the girl reciprocate with nude photos of herself. Fortunately the girl did not send Officer Donahue any nudes. If she did then he would be charged with possession of child pornography, but his efforts make us wonder why the act of attempting to persuade a minor to produce child pornography is not an act worthy of an independent charge in this case. According to the United States Department of Justice, "Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child pornography offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law." See https://ift.tt/1OfCtHN and 18 U.S.C. 2252(b)(1) "Whoever violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years," with subsection (a) addressing certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors (https://ift.tt/1I10H4g). We believe that by attempting to persuade a 15 year old girl to produce intimate images of herself and transmit those images to him that Officer Donahue violated 18 U.S.C. 2252(a)(2) by attempting to receive child pornography. We hope that the FBI and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California will take action against Officer Donahue in the near future. According to media reports, some of Officer Donahue's texts included language indicating that Donahue was well aware that his actions were wrong such as "I really wanna be with you," "let me have a chance with you," and "nobody has to know." Some of the selfies he transmitted gave special meaning to the SPD's statement that Donahue "tarnishes the Sacramento Police Department badge" by featuring Donahue exposing himself while at work and wearing his uniform. According to jail records, Daniel Joseph Donahue was born on October 19, 1995 (25 years old). In 2016 he listed an address in Vacaville, California when registering to vote as a Republican. However, he has been linked to at least two other addresses in the years since and we are not sure which one is current. #danieldonahue #sexoffenders #snapchat #hoop

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34472/sacramento-officer-daniel-donahue-arrested-for-sexting-minor

Fort Lauderdale Officer Louis Walsh Arrested for Sexting Minor

Fort Lauderdale Police Officer Louis Walsh was arrested today for sending harmful material to a minor via text messages. That "minor" turned out to be an undercover detective and that harmful material included a dick pic selfie. Walsh has been placed on administrative leave without pay pending the outcome of an internal investigation. As of now we believe that he is in the Broward County Jail, but will likely be released in the near future. Officer Walsh was also a wrestling coach at Cardinal Gibbons High School where he also worked special security details. He also worked special security details at St. Anthony Catholic School. For those reasons we fear that his texts might be just the tip of the iceberg. It is all too common for pedophiles to gravitate towards jobs working in close proximity with children. Just by being a wrestling coach he had a seemingly legitimate excuse to put his hands on kids in ways that likely stimulated him. According to public records, Louis J. Walsh is a 29 year old resident of Pompano Beach, Florida whose last known address is 4194 Marina Way. He has a handful of traffic citations including multiple citations for following too closely. We normally do not make home addresses of cops publicly available on this site, which is why the map above is censored, but we make exceptions for officers charged with sex crimes. In such cases we paste their address into the body of the article to warn people living nearby. Walsh appears to be a sexual predator and we want people to know where their kids should not go. Please do not use this information for any unlawful purpose. The following information was taken from jail records (https://ift.tt/3lNBH7W Arrest Number: 502100614 Arrest Date: 03/24/2021 Arresting Agency: BROWARD SHERIFF'S OFFICE Race: W Sex: M DOB: 05/25/1991 Height: 510 Weight: 270 Hair: BRO Eyes: BRO Location: Main Jail UPDATE: According to a Facebook post by the Jimmy Ryce Center (https://ift.tt/3fp9Zxp) anyone with information regarding predatory conduct by Officer Walsh should contact Detective Erica Rockey at 954-888-5290. #louiswalsh #sexoffenders #cardinalgibbonshighschool

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34471/fort-lauderdale-officer-louis-walsh-arrested-for-sexting-minor

NYPD Officer David Afanador Arrested Again for Armed Assault on Ocean

NYPD Officer David Afanador was arrested over the weekend for carrying out an armed assault on the Atlantic Ocean when he fired shots at the body of water from the shore at Ocean Beach Park. He was charged with criminal possession of a weapon and unlawful possession of alcohol due to alcohol being banned in the park. He faces no charges for recklessly endangering the lives of an untold number of fish, marine mammals, and microbial life. That is likely because of a lack of legislation protecting the rights of marine life and an inability to know how many living things were endangered by Afanador due to a lack of witnesses capable of knowing exactly what was submerged beneath the surface. We also believe that charges should be brought for recklessly endangering people if New York, like other states, does not require a known victim to have been endangered. We are not aware of any state that has not made it is a crime to recklessly endanger other persons. Often, reckless endangerment statutes do not require a named victim. That was the in Oregon both times that this author has been convicted or reckless endangerment. The first involved setting off Piccolo Pete Bombs on a deserted street before the 4th of July in 2007 and the second involved drunkenly throwing a pint glass behind myself hard enough to break a TV I did not realize was there in 2010. In both cases the controlling case law involved a man firing a gun in public. That man was not accused of coming anywhere close to hitting any known person, but the appeals courts in Oregon ruled that all the government must show was that had a person been in his line of fire that there was a substantial risk of injuring that person. In my first case, the government charged me with unlawful possession of a destructive device and reckless endangerment before offering me 80 hours of community service if I pled to the reckless endangerment charge. My lawyer though he could easily beat the endangerment charge due to the low likelihood of Piccolo Pete Bombs hurting a bystander at all, but he also felt that if he could not suppress the warrantless search of my place or a jury believed a snitch that claimed to have seen me with them that the risk of being convicted of a felony for making the homemade fireworks was high enough and the future legal fees of winning significant enough that pleading to a misdemeanor in exchange for community service was the right move. I took the 2010 case to trial because I had not gone to court and was not re-arrested until 2012. By then I was facing a slew of unrelated charges in federal court for a threatening email I sent to a deranged stalker that had endangered members of my immediate family, but because I would not remove an allegation posted by someone else on a website of mine accusing her of having a STD they decided to treat her as a victim for the purpose of shutting down the website. The feds were working with local prosecutor Kevin Demer (https://ift.tt/2OWekwU) to lock me up as long as possible, so Demer refused to consider a plea in that case and instead took me to trial where he sought the statutory maximum of 1 year. Oddly enough, I was acquitted of the most serious and relevant charge in that case because Demer failed to provide the court with proof that the TV was worth more than $500, so I could not be convicted of 2nd degree criminal mischief, and Oregon law required intent to damage property to convict on a mischief III charge. I was however convicted of reckless endangerment just because had someone been between myself and the TV that they would have likely been injured if struck by the pint glass. I was sentenced to 120 days in jail just for breaking a TV by accident, but part of the Judge Angel Lopez's (https://ift.tt/394580A) motive was due to lies told by two witnesses that worked at the bar and were close friends. Those lies included an accusation that I had thrown the glass directly at one of them (https://ift.tt/2OZISOj), but one of them was clearly motivated by personal reasons having been exposed for lying to the police on another site of mine (https://ift.tt/2QyewTF). Despite their stories changing, that false accusation not appearing in the original police reports, and conflicting statements from a co-worker of theirs, Judge Lopez stated he believed the lies and sentenced me to 120 days saying that his reason for acquitting me of the mischief charges was that he thought my intent was to harm people instead of property, and I was lucky to have only been charged with mischief instead of Attempted Assault II. By obtaining that sentence my criminal history level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG) increased by two levels for having a prior sentence of more than 60 days. If it were not for that I would not have likely received a 24 month sentence for making threatening communication in federal court. The Oregon law is clearly unjust because it results in people being convicted of endangerment without endangering anyone, so hopefully New York has more sense, but they probably don't. If New York has a reckless endangerment law like Oregon and like Oregon that law does not require any known person to actually be endangered, then Officer Afanador is clearly guilty and should be charged because for all he knew there could have been a scuba diver directly under the surface where his bullet hit. Officer Afanador was first featured on Cop Blaster last year when he was arrested for using unnecessary and excessive force against a black man by putting him in a chokehold on a boardwalk in Rockaway Beach (https://ift.tt/2YmGgw4). He was suspended without pay for that incident, but despite that case still pending before the courts, the NYPD had reassigned him to restricted duty due to his inability to legally carry a firearm. He has again been suspended without pay for this incident. Hopefully he will be officially fired finally. In 2016, Afanador was acquitted of charges stemming from the pistol whipping of a 16 year old boy that broke two of his teeth during a drug bust. That beating was caught on camera, but the jury did not consider that behavior to be criminal. We are not sure exactly why he was acquitted, but it probably had to do with an argument that the pistol whipping was done pursuant to the arrest of a "noncompliant" victim and therefore protected by the shroud of qualified immunity. #davidafanador #nypd #animallivesmatter #oceanbeachpark

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34469/nypd-officer-david-afanador-arrested-again-for-armed-assault-on-ocean

Portland Police Officer Andrew Caspar Fired for Delayed Response

Portland Police Officer Andrew Caspar has been fired for his delayed response to a welfare check in 2019. When he did arrive he allowed a suspect to "briskly walk away" citing an Obama era policy of not chasing suspects. He probably would have kept his job despite those things had he not been found guilty of lying about it to an internal review board. The suspect was never apprehended as far as we know and not much is known about the nature of the call beyond it being a welfare check. Now he would be getting his own welfare check from the unemployment office had he not been fired for cause which disqualifies people from receiving unemployment benefits in Oregon. According to the Oregon Criminal Justice Information Records Inquiry System (CJ IRIS), Andrew H. Caspar had been working with the PPB since 1998. His DPSST number was 35444. According to public records the Heyden puts the H. in Andrew H. Caspar. He is 48 years old. #andrewcaspar #mentalhealth #liars

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34468/portland-police-officer-andrew-caspar-fired-for-delayed-response

Samantha Gibbs Hemet CA - C.I.

Samantha Gibbs, 34 from Hemet California. Set-up her husband and informed the police of the vehicle being driven and what could be found in it, to get one of her "give up three and go free" victims. This man had given her everything she needed since they met and when they eventually got married told him they would never have sex. Eventually she agreed to let him pleasure her for $2500, but never followed thru with her part. This is her way of not having to do what she agreed to. Hey him out of the picture. Set him up with 3g over the threshold and then called her handler telling him where and when he could be pulled over. What a despicable example of a human being. #setupandsnitchedonherhusband

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34467/samantha-gibbs-hemet-ca-c-i

Modesto Police Officer Joseph Lamantia Arrested for Manslaughter

Modesto Police Officer Joseph Lamantia has been fired and arrested for manslaughter for the unjustified shooting death of Trevor Seever. Seever was shot four times by Officer Lamantia on December 29, 2020. He later died at the hospital. No weapon was found. Seever's family had a ratted him out over what they claimed were vague threats made by Seever after purchasing a firearm. Before responding to the 911 call, Officer Lamantia recognized Seever's name from an officer safety bulletin that had been circulating around the MPD accusing Seever of posting a comment on Instagram that read "All I want for Christmas is another dead MPD officer. a good cop is a dead cop." Body camera footage does not show Seever doing anything that justified shooting him. It seems like Officer Lamantia had an itchy trigger finger consistent with his history. Truthfully stating one's opinion online does not justify using force on someone no matter how threatened an officer might feel when reading their statements weeks later. Despite that it seems that Officer Lamantia responded to Seever's last episode with his mind made up that Seever would only get a couple warnings and that he would shoot if he did not fully comply with his demands. In the video below you can hear Officer Lamantia yell "get on the ground, get on the ground!" right before opening fire. Seever's mother later said "my son was unarmed and was brutally murdered when he had his hand up and complying with Officer Lamantia." She did not say that her son had both hands up or was on the ground before being shot as Officer Lamantia requested, but that does not change the fact that no justification can be found for shooting him. Officers do not have the right to use lethal force on people just because they won't get on the ground or put both hands in the air. The fact that some snitch family member reported him as being armed does not change that analysis. Unless an officer sees someone holding an object that could only be a firearm and use that object in a manner capable of hurting them are they justified opening fire. Seever was never even found to be in possession of anything that could have been mistaken for a gun. Imagine how many people would be murdered by police every year if they were justified using deadly force whenever they receive a phone call accusing someone of being armed and the subject of that report does not get on the ground right away. It wouldn't be long until people realized that if anyone they want dead is not likely to be fully compliant when accosted by police that all they need do to get them killed is call 911 and say they are armed. That is why it is on the officer to verify the accuracy of reports they receive when those reports accuse someone of being armed. As someone who naturally fights back when accosted by police, especially if they put hands on me before I have time to think about it, I consider trigger happy cops like Lamantia very dangerous. I think back to the time when someone swatted a relative of mine likely hoping I would be there and give the cops an excuse to use force on me when she described me as an armed man with hostages. I have always suspected that person of trying to get me killed by setting me up with the police under circumstances where I would likely not comply if accosted and they would shoot me thinking I had a gun. Seever is the fourth person killed in an officer involved shooting involving Officer Lamantia since 2010. We are not sure if he fired the fatal shots in those other incidents. The mainstream media has reported his involvement and we believe he fired shots, but just are not sure if his bullets were technically the ones that killed those people. Lamantia was also involved in the non-fatal shooting of a fifth victim back in October. We do not see many cases involving officers linked to so many fatal shootings and when we do they are usually in larger cities and the killing take place over a longer period of time. Needless to say we fully support the decision of Interim Chief Brandon Gillespie to fire Lamantia. Lamantia is charged with voluntary manslaughter according to his indictment which we are uploading with this article as a PDF (see PDF icon above map). The indictment says that Lamantia "did willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and without malice kill Trevor Seever, a human being, upon a sudden quarrel and heat of passion." That sounds an awful lot like murder to us. According to that charge he intentionally shot someone due to "heat of passion" during a sudden quarrel and the person died, but he did not necessarily intend for him to die. The only difference according to the internet (https://ift.tt/3lw3tFY) is "malice afterthought" which is required to sustain a murder conviction. Malice afterthought exists when someone acted with intent to kill or a conscious disregard for human life. We think that Officer Lamantia acted with at least a conscious disregard for human life and should be charged with third degree murder. Anyone else would be charged with murder under such circumstances, but because of blue privilege people like Lamantia get the benefit of any doubts in the charging process. It seems that the prosecutor's office decided that it would be prudent for their local thin blue line family not to allow a jury to decide if he acted with a conscious disregard for human life and decided that everything happened too quickly for him to think before shooting despite being trained as police officer that should have been able to make educated decisions under such circumstances. According to public records, Anthony Joseph Lamantia is a 35 year old resident of Hughson, California. Hughson is a small town near Modesto. He is a registered Republican with no prior criminal record. According to jail records he has posted bail and is no longer in custody. Because Lamantia has killed multiple people, appears to be getting away with murder, and in the words of his own department has a history of killing people during sudden quarrels and heats of passion, we consider him a danger to the community. His last known address is listed as 1619 7th Street. If you live in that area be careful around the man pictured on this page. We normally do not post home addresses of cops on this site, which is why it is censored in the map above, but we make exceptions in cases in which we think the subject is a danger to people living nearby, which is why we are including it in the body of this article. We ask that nobody use that address for any unlawful purposes. We think posting it could be useful for people looking at his picture and city while wondering if he might be their neighbor or someone they've associated with at that location. That location should be avoided. #josephlamantia #trevorseever #murder #brandongillespie

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34466/modesto-police-officer-joseph-lamantia-arrested-for-manslaughter

Lawsuit Prompts Press to Finally Say the Name Jordan Schutte

Mainstream media outlets have responded to a wrongful death lawsuit filed against Pettis County Sheriff's Deputy Jordan Daniel Schutte by finally saying his name even though they have known his name since July of last year. We learned his name after the father of Hannah Fizer posted Schutte's name on his Facebook profile and people in Sedalia sent us copies before he took it down. We gave him the benefit of any doubts because to throw out a name without being sure about it would have contradicted everything else he has done in response to his daughter's murder. We made many efforts to get the media in Sedalia to say or print the name Jordan Schutte, but were always met with boiler plate responses referring to policies on naming officers. Now that his name has been printed we are posting this to say we told you so. John Fizer's response to his daughter's death has been shocking and not in a bad way. He is a lifelong conservative Christian that does not want to be seen as anti-police despite what happened. We have had a hard time understanding how anyone can suffer a loss like this and still be supportive of law enforcement in general. The rest of the family and Sedalia for the most part are the same way, so that led to some friction with them and we decided to take a break from the case after Stephen Sokoloff refused to charge Schutte with any crimes. Some of the friction with the family included being banned from Facebook groups about the case associated with them and suggesting that such censorship could have been due to being under duress by local law enforcement (https://ift.tt/3kqHezi), but at the same time we also suspected that the conflict was because they considered our methods too extreme for them. It also seems a lot of people thought we were being disrespectful for questioning their tactics and suggesting they needed to take a more anti-police stance. Still, we defend asking if they were under duress because someone needs to do that in situations like this. Even if the family is offended by the questions it is better to ask them than to just shut up because what if they were acting the way they were due to threats from local cops? We were afraid that maybe the Fizer family may have been afraid of then Pettis County Sheriff Kevin Bond and therefore trying to minimize the consequences for his department. In hindsight, this author thinks that at least I may have let my personal feelings towards religious conservatism negatively influence my interactions with people in Sedalia. I have never been a religious person and grew up being told I couldn't do this or that by religious relatives that drove me nuts, so seeing a group of very religious people tolerate things I find personally intolerable based on religious beliefs always irritates me. I once read a statement by John Fizer in which he said that he had forgiven Jordan Schutte for what he did and it sounded like his reasons had to do with the preaching of Jesus Christ on forgiveness. I must admit that I have never studied Christ's teachings in any great detail and certainly not enough to understand how they could convince a man in John Fizer's shoes to forgive someone like Jordan Schutte. Maybe John is just a better man than me at such things. We followed up our exodus from Sedalia by failing to practice what we preach. While we are pleasantly surprised to see that the Fizer's are not going to let this go, we are also embarrassed not to have noticed the articles about the lawsuit until earlier tonight. We used to get frequent updates from members of the community about the case, but it seems the family managed to convince everyone in that area we were working with to stop involving us at all. That seems due to the culture clash we have observed. A number of people would say to us that they needed to have the last say on how people respond because they are the ones that lost someone. We thought that was nice thinking but not realistic. We were surprised to see how many people would give the PCSO, Kevin Bond, Stephen Sokoloff, and Jordan Schutte passes from certain non-violent forms of reprisal just because the family asked them to. A lot of times when families say stuff like that it falls on deaf ears because most people blow it off as stuff they are just saying to avoid being blamed by the cops for what happens next. Shocking as well were comments by people in Facebook groups dedicated to Hannah's case respond to comments like "we aren't cop haters here" with "amen." We have always been of the belief that protecting the public from bad cops is a job too important to be left in the hands of people like the Fizer's. By people like them we are referring to grief stricken decent vulnerable people. We think that victims' families are far too likely to denounce certain types of responses for the purpose of not wanting their loves ones to be remembered for how people reacted to their murders. In the case of John Fizer, we think he probably would have been outraged at the sight of so much as a broken window because he does not want his daughter remembered for such things. We have always felt that had Kevin Bond had to worry about "George Floyd riots" in his town that he would have been far more likely to do something about Schutte himself for the purpose of appeasing the people and that holding people like Schutte accountable prevents future Hannah's in the long run, so whatever happens in the meantime is usually a necessary evil. That is not to say that we would have supported a riot in Sedalia, but we certainly think that had Bond thought one would happen that he would have responded better. The Fizer's of course don't want their daughter remembered as the catalyst for such things and are only willing to preach responses that are far too timid for our tastes. Most communities don't listen to families the way the town of Sedalia has and with that surely comes some sort of folksy small town pride. Now, back to the title of this article. The mainstream media finally being willing to say the name Jordan Schutte. We want to know what their sudden change of heart was. It certainly was not screenshots and copies of John Fizer's Facebook post last summer, and it was not due to them finally finding out who he is from a "reliable" source. Just this past October, KRCG reporter Gladys Bautista blurred Schutte's image out of surveillance footage and redacted it from documents turned over to the station pursuant to public records requests (https://ift.tt/34dUP88). Bautista explained "we blurred some of the video because he is not facing charges." She was obviously lying since KRCG is one of the media outlets now reporting his name. He still is not facing charges. The only things that have changed besides him being sued was the election of Brad Anders as Sheriff and Anders deciding not to employ Schutte anymore. Schutte had been put back on duty by Kevin Bond before Anders took office. So, what was it? Was it being sued, losing his job, or both? We really want to figure out the answer to this because we have been arguing with journalists all over the country for almost a year in multiple cases in which we have identified bad officers in high profile cases before their names were released by any "official" source, the press has refused to say their names, and we ended up saying we told them so. Cases such as the identification of a detective in Florissant, Missouri (https://ift.tt/3eYPX9j) that ran over an unarmed black man with a SUV last year less than two weeks before Hannah Fizer's murder, police officers in Rochester, New York that pepper sprayed a 9 year old girl in January (https://ift.tt/39Eobzh), and more Rochester officers that body slammed a mother as she held her 3 year old daughter's hand (https://ift.tt/3v7Lz0B). In those incidents we would send links to our findings to local journalists in those areas and were always fed boiler plate responses like the one used by KRCG in Hannah's case. Those responses typically said they do not identify officers unless they are charged with a crime or the department releases their names. There are of course obvious exceptions to that rule on a case by case basis which has resulted in officers being named when not charged with crimes and their departments still refusing to release names, but they are few and far between. What is it about the Fizer case that made the mainstream press change their minds? Is it simply that a member of the bar filed paperwork naming Schutte as the defendant in a lawsuit or is there more to it? Speaking of the lawsuit, we cannot find any reports of Pettis County being named as a defendant. We also checked the announcement on the website of the law firm representing the Fizer's (https://ift.tt/3vzkvHN) and they only name Jordan Schutte. Why isn't John Fizer suing Pettis County? That is the question we would most like to find the answer to. It is rare for a municipality like Pettis County not to be sued along with any officers involved in murders such as this one. It looks like the suit is accusing Schutte alone of "using willful excessive force, violating recognized police training procedures and protocols, and causing the avoidable death of Hannah Fizer." That statement seems to absolve the county of liability by saying that Schutte violated procedures and protocols on his own. If sued with that language the county could turn around and say that Schutte alone violated procedures. In order for a municipality to be held liable under federal law the plaintiff usually has to prove that a policy or custom of the organization caused damage. That would require that the Fizer's find something in the written policies of the county that contributed to Hannah's death or that some custom was so widespread within the PCSO that it amounted to an unwritten policy and that custom contributed to her death. Policies and customs can include things like failure to properly train or supervise employees. If we were the Fizer's we would argue that Pettis County's failure to hire competent deputies, failure to competently train deputies, and failure to hold deputies accountable created an environment where deputies were not sufficiently deterred from using excessive force, not sufficiently trained to use less than lethal force in situations like Hannah's traffic stop, and the culture made deputies feel safe to screw up knowing that Kevin Bond had their backs. That would give rise to a cause of action in federal court under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for deprivation of civil rights under color of state law. This in not a federal lawsuit however. It was filed in the Circuit Court of Pettis County, Missouri, so there could be some difference between state and federal law that we do not know about. We think that a federal case would have allowed a better forum. The case would have been heard in another city where the judge is not part of the same good old boy network as the defendant, jurors would not have to worry about pissing off local law enforcement, and monetary awards are typically higher. Municipalities are also more likely to settle for larger amounts than individuals are, but that might not matter because Schutte is likely covered by the county's insurance anyway. When an officer is found liable compensation is usually paid from the same judgment fund as the municipality they were working for even if sued in their individual capacity. Conclusion We wish the Fizer's the best of luck with this lawsuit. We are glad to see that our faith in Mr. Fizer as a reliable source of information was well placed. We still have questions about why the press finally named Jordan Schutte and why Pettis County is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit. #jordanschutte #hannahfizer #kevinbond #stephensokoloff

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34465/lawsuit-prompts-press-to-finally-say-the-name-jordan-schutte

Feds Obstruct Public Easement in Downtown Portland Illegally Again

The federal government is once again illegally obstructing a public easement in downtown Portland, Oregon by erecting a fence identical to the one erected last summer and recently removed. The city of Portland billed the United States over $3,000,000 last year for blocking a public easement with a fence they erected on city property without a permit, but the feds will never have to pay the city any of that money due to the doctrine of sovereign immunity (https://ift.tt/3nSSIOF). That doctrine allows federal law enforcement to do as they wish and avoid accountability under state and local laws with limited exceptions. The United States waived sovereign immunity when Congress passed the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) which allows the United States to be sued for property damage caused by federal employees in the course of their official duties, but the FTCA also includes an exception for law enforcement that only permits them to be sued under certain circumstances. We recently went into great detail about those circumstances in response to accusations that federal officers were breaking windows at downtown Portland businesses with stinger grenades and a claim that those business owners could sue the federal government for it (https://ift.tt/3bINqkJ). We will rely on the arguments put forth in that article to support our conclusions here since they are basically the same. The federal government has only waived sovereign immunity for conduct constituting "assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights" when the perpetrators are federal law enforcement officers acting in accordance with their official duties. Because that fence was put up pursuant to a contract with federal law enforcement and erecting that fence does not meet the applicable criteria, no court is capable of forcing the federal government to pay fines levied against them by the city of Portland. Even if the perpetrators were non-law enforcement federal employees, the FTCA refers only to "injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred." Obviously blocking an easement does not amount to property loss or damage. Under the FTCA the city cannot sue the feds to collect fees for construction that violates local ordinances. Because of sovereign immunity efforts by the city to force the feds to remove the fence (https://ift.tt/30HRs6b) were symbolic at best. Also symbolic is seeing a new fence erected after volunteers took it upon themselves to improve the exterior of the building following the removal of the first fence (https://ift.tt/3qU9nSn). The feds responded by attacking the volunteers with pepper balls, tear gas, and rubber bullets as they worked (https://ift.tt/2OhwKIs). Fortunately there remain several other federally occupied facilities where people can still volunteer without having to climb a fence. The presence of a new fence shows that the people of Portland are still doing all they can to make their community better despite the continued presence of hostile and destructive federal forces occupying parts of the city. #homelandsecurity #usmarshals #antifa #portlandprotests

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34464/feds-obstruct-public-easement-in-downtown-portland-illegally-again

Clark County Judge Darvin Zimmerman Caught Mocking Shooting Victim

Clark County District Judge Darvin Zimmerman was exposed over the weekend for comments he made without realizing that the video camera in his courtroom was recording and livestreaming after a hearing had ended last Tuesday. In the video (embedded below) Judge Zimmerman can be heard talking to District Court Commissioner Abigail Bartlett about the shooting of Kevin Peterson Junior. Peterson was shot and killed in Hazel Dell last year by a drug task force that Judge Zimmerman's son, Clark County Sheriff's Sgt. Erik Zimmerman, was a member of. Sgt. Zimmerman was working surveillance, so we know that he did not fire the fatal shot. While working surveillance he must have noticed that Peterson Jr. was running away from fellow deputies when he was shot (see video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HrPI9d0Eu0). Shooting someone in the back as they are running away is never justified. It does not matter if he ignored requests from officers that he stop running because running away is not a hostile act. The entire drug task force including Sgt. Zimmerman have some serious explaining to do, but the hope that they will be held accountable fades when people learn what kinds of people are in charge of holding them accountable. People like judges in Clark County including Deputy Zimmerman's father. What did Judge Zimmerman say that was so bad? He said several things, as the video below shows. First, he refers to Peterson Jr. as "the Black guy they are trying to make an angel out of." Then he talks about how fortunate his son was to have been promoted to sergeant before the shooting because as a sergeant he was able to work surveillance duty and not participate in efforts to apprehend Peterson directly. His exact words were "luckily he got the promotion to sergeant because he could have been the shooter, then they would be marching out at his house with, you know, the signs saying you're a murderer and all that bullshit." Then he attacks Peterson's father for supposedly trying to profit off he son's death. Judge Zimmerman said in reference to Kevin Peterson Sr. "The next day he wakes up with dollar signs in his eyes and George Floyd's attorneys." He goes on complaining about Peterson Sr. setting up a GoFundMe page (https://ift.tt/3cEtXkm) and claiming on that page that his son was murdered by the police, which he was, but according to Judge Zimmerman the money raised by Peterson Sr. ($61,000) was all raised under false pretenses. Then he attacks Peterson Jr. for being "dumb" for thinking that he would go to prison for such a small amount of drugs. That comment appears to be willful ignorance of the fact that black males then to be disproportionately targeted by narcs and excessively sentenced for small amounts of drugs. He then describes a false narrative of Peterson getting shot 30 times in the back by admitting the Peterson was shot once in the back. Zimmerman follows that key admission with a token effort to make himself look like he is not racist by describing the time he volunteered at a black community center decades ago, "I was their token white guy." Judge Zimmerman's comments speak volumes about the state of the criminal injustice system in America today where the Thin Blue Line is always one big family consisting of judges, prosecutors, police officers, and others. How can a court remain an objective third party when its members have immediate family members working with local law enforcement? They will probably say that they recuse themselves whenever a case involving a family member comes before them, but what effect does that have on the next judge? The next judge surely knows the last one and enjoys what is at least a positive professional relationship if not a personal friendship with that judge. Could the next judge really be trusted to disregard their feelings for their fellow judges and their families when deciding a case? Of course not. On top of that the next judge is likely to have members of their own family working in law enforcement somewhere. They all consider themselves part of the Thin Blue Line family. That is why the American court system can never be relied on to return a just verdict when hearing accusations against members of the Thin Blue Line family. Cases such as this one where a local judge's son is involved must be scrutinized to the fullest by the public because otherwise the incentive to dispose of it quickly and quietly is too great. Court officers must be made to fear greater consequences, such as the inconvenience of protests, should they choose not to serve justice in cases such as this one. That is why people must protest by "marching out at [their] house[s] with, you know, the signs saying [they]'re [] murderer[s] and all that [good] shit." According to public records, Darvin John Zimmerman is 70 years old and has lived in Vancouver, Washington since at least the the late 1970s when he registered to vote as a Vancouver resident in 1979. His bar number is 6829 and he has been a member of the Washington State Bar Association since 1976. He is not currently eligible to practice law, but still has judicial status. His Clark County email address is darvin.zimmerman[at]clark.wa.gov and the Hotmail account darvin.zimmerman[at]hotmail.com appears to have been linked to him. If still active those might be a good places to send your resignation requests. Due to his extreme old age he will probably retire in the near future no matter what. #darvinzimmerman #erikzimmerman #kevinpetersonjr #racism

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34463/clark-county-judge-darvin-zimmerman-caught-mocking-shooting-victim

Carti (Ex-Rawri player) Snitched on me and glizzy when we were trappin

Homie snitched on me after I was straight whippin in the kitchen wit ma boy gliz. He ratted on the gang and now im callin him out. Carti if u see this im comin for your head and I aint talkin diss tracks. #traptoolsgamo

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34462/carti-ex-rawri-player-snitched-on-me-and-glizzy-when-we-were-trappin

Watch out for this white girl

She poses as if to buy weed or meth to get record of you making a sell she will come at least 5 times sometimes a black dude will be with her to throw off she working but she is getting paid to set up dealers. She will be in a white SUV she cuts hair in valdosta but will be in pearson, douglas waycross and jacksonville #informant #working #valdosta #homerville

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34461/watch-out-for-this-white-girl

George Terwilliger Threatens A Cop

Attempted to get Julian assange AND chelsea manning arrested Justified trump firing james comey Justified Ajit Pai's Net neutrality decision prosecuted multiple members of the original doxbin (the .onion version) He once said the Paris attacks in 2015 could've been prevented if "The government had better intelligence gathering and greater surveillance over it's citizens" Justified border patrol inhumane tortures, guantanamo bay torture, as well as racial profiling on FOX News with the possibility of MS-13 members crossing the borders Justified government use of seized drug money as well as his father Allegedly has multiple accounts on KKK and white supremacy forums such as Stormfront.com #corruption

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34460/george-terwilliger-threatens-a-cop

Are Federal Officers Breaking Windows in Downtown Portland?

After reading a tweet a few minutes ago I began to wonder if federal officers and breaking windows in downtown Portland, Oregon and if so, are they legally liable to those businesses? The tweet in question read: "Dear Downtown Portland businesses. If your window broke and you find tiny black rubber balls in the glass, it was broken by the Fed's stinger grenades, and you now have recourse to obtain compensation for the property damage. Take pictures" - Luciux Riker (https://twitter.com/Luciuxness/status/1370477061836582914) I was quick to respond that the United States does not appear to have waived sovereign immunity for cases involving property damaged by their officers in the course of their official duties under the section of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) applicable to law enforcement 28 U.S.C. 2680(h). I thought this warranted some more looking into and upon further review believe that our conclusion was correct. Although the FTCA (28 U.S.C. 1346) does read in part "for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred." Most people would read that and think that the feds are liable when their officers damage property, but they are also not aware of restrictions found elsewhere in the United States Code. That law is also subject to 28 U.S.C. 2680(h) which limits what the United States can be sued for when the employees in question are law enforcement officers. When the acts of law enforcement officers give rise to a tort then only the acts specifically mentioned in 28 U.S.C. 2680(h) expose the federal government to tort liability. See 28 U.S.C. 2680: The provisions of this chapter and section 1346(b) of this title shall not apply to... (h)Any claim arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights: Provided, That, with regard to acts or omissions of investigative or law enforcement officers of the United States Government, the provisions of this chapter and section 1346(b) of this title shall apply to any claim arising, on or after the date of the enactment of this proviso, out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process, or malicious prosecution. For the purpose of this subsection, investigative or law enforcement officer means any officer of the United States who is empowered by law to execute searches, to seize evidence, or to make arrests for violations of Federal law. 28 U.S.C. 2680 essentially exempts the United States for liability for property damage caused by the "wrongful act or omission of any employee" when that employee is a law enforcement officer unless the claim arises out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights. As you can see, damaging property is not on that list, so you cannot sue the federal government for property damaged by federal law enforcement officers. I have experience successfully suing federal law enforcement officers under this section while acting as my own lawyer, so I am extremely familiar with it. So much so that I consider myself to an experienced attorney at hobby as someone with years of experience practicing law in my leisure time. The only possibly exception could be if you could also prove that the officer's misconduct constituted an assault under the reasonable apprehension or attempted battery standards and that in the course of that assault property was damaged. The burden for proving assault by a federal officer is high because you must prove that the officer intended to inflict bodily harm or at least fear of such harm for a maliciously and sadistically for the purpose of causing harm, so basically you must prove that excessive force was used, that such force constituted an assault, and that during the course of that assault your property was damaged. For instance, if you could prove that an officer's conduct met the high standard for an assault under the FTCA and the only reason it did not result in a battery was that the projectile missed the intended person and damaged property belonging to that person, someone might be able to succeed in a suit against the United States if they were the person being fired at and the property damaged was theirs. The same is true if the officer threw a stinger grenade at someone for no legitimate purpose just to scare them, they in fact scared them, and their property were damaged. That would only work in the case of protests in downtown Portland if a business owner were standing peacefully outside their establishment, an officer wrongfully shot at them, and their business was damaged. A person cannot sue anyone for assault when the person assaulted was someone else because they lack standing. This means that finding the window of your business broken and rubber balls in the glass does not give you recourse to obtain compensation for property damage from the feds. Are stinger grenades capable of breaking glass? Unfortunately I could not find any online resources capable of answering that question. It is barely even discussed, but depending on how thick the glass is some windows could likely be easily broken by the rubber pellets from a stinger grenade. I would however be shocked to find a downtown business with windows weak enough to be broken by a rubber ball from such a grenade. Such grenades are used downtown so often that I'm sure the news would have covered it if they were breaking windows. They might have broken a few, but certainly not many. I spent several years of my life behind bars where stinger grenades were used from time to time and I never once heard of any windows being broken. Windows in correctional facilities are usually stronger than those one would usually find at a business, even a downtown storefront used to people throwing stuff at the windows. Shortly after my release I accidentally broke a century old plate glass window just by touching it and I could see a window like that being broken by a rubber ball from a stinger grenade, but I would be shocked to find a downtown business without much stronger windows. As you can see in the video below, the rubber balls from a stinger grenade come out fast, but not fast enough to leave me with the impression that they break many windows. Conclusion The feds are probably not breaking windows in downtown Portland and even if they are they cannot be successfully sued for it. #homelandsecurity #usmarshals #portlandprotests #propertydamage

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34459/are-federal-officers-breaking-windows-in-downtown-portland

Feds Attack Protesters Outside Federal Courthouse in Portland, Oregon

Federal officers with the Federal Protective Service (FPS), United States Marshals Service (USM), and possibly other agencies attacked protesters outside the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon and continue to do so as I type. The picture above is of a man that was just snatched by a federal officer. He is now on the ground in hand cuffs. An officer had attacked him with some sort of mace before grabbing him. Earlier the feds fired tear gas, pepper balls, and rubber bullets at a crowd before forcing them out of a public park across the street from the courthouse. The feds are upset about improvement made to the building earlier in the evening. Those improvements included public service announcements on the walls, removal of oppressive glass, and plywood eyesores. The Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse has been a temple of tyranny in Portland since it was built in the 1990s. Whenever citizens voluntarily perform public services such as the ones performed tonight, the feds typically respond with violence. Many of the federal officers responsible appear to have been brainwashed into thinking that they operate under the authority of a legitimate government without realizing that their government is not legitimate at all. If they came to terms with reality and realized that they have no legitimate authority over anyone, they might realize that they have no right to do anything under color of their laws whatsoever. While they continue their actions anything that has been done to them or property they claimed to be theirs was justified, and every person they arrested is totally innocent. Oregon can never be free as long as they remain here. You can watch the revolution live via CJTV by using the embedded video below. #antifa #blacklivesmatter #portlandprotests #homelandsecurity

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34458/feds-attack-protesters-outside-federal-courthouse-in-portland-oregon

RPD Officer Matthew Drake Did Not Have a Taser When Shooting Man

Rochester Police officer Matthew Drake shot and killed a homeless man during a mental health crisis during the early morning hours of last night. The Rochester Police Department (RPD) were quick to release body camera footage which supports the position that the shooting was justified, but only because Officer Drake was not equipped with a taser. According to local media coverage, a radio call went out for an officer equipped with a bean bag gun or a taser before Officer Drake shot the yet to be identified man in self defense outside of the Open Door Mission. We say that this was a self defense shooting because as the footage from Drake's body camera (embedded below) shows he made a good faith effort to retreat before opening fire. It also appears that the man, who was armed with a knife, increased his speed as he advanced towards Officer Drake in the seconds before he opened fire. Because Officer Drake did not have the option of trying to use less than lethal force we consider this a self defense shooting. This shooting is similar to the shooting of Ricardo Munoz last year in Pennsylvania which we considered self defense because Munoz chased an officer with a knife, the officer tried to run away, and only after Munoz caught up was he shot (https://ift.tt/3hog6ix). We believe that the outcome of this incident would have been different had the RPD equipped their officers with tasers. We are always shocked when we see footage like this, ask why officers never tried using a taser, and find out that none of the officers involved had one. That was the case in Philadelphia last year when Walter Wallace Jr. was killed by police while acting in a manner similar to the victim in this case (https://ift.tt/3ox062w). In that case we were quick to reach the conclusion that officers did not need to kill Wallace because he was far enough away that a taser should have worked just fine, but that was before we learned that none of the officers had tasers. His distance was about the same as the distance between the man in Rochester and Officer Drake. The blame for Wallace's death could be placed squarely on the shoulders of Philadelphia Police Chief Danielle Outlaw (https://ift.tt/37OGtx4) who began a program to equip officers with tasers but failed to follow through on implementing it promptly. In this case the blame for this death should be placed on Interim RPD Chief Cynthia Herriott-Sullivan, her predecessors, and anyone working above them that should have known that police officers need tasers to avoid killing people. You don't need law enforcement training let alone years of experience like Herriott-Sullivan has to know that if you fail to issue tasers that it is only a matter of time until an officer will be forced to choose between using lethal force or taking on an armed suspect unarmed. We were able to identify Matthew D. Drake as the shooter in this case due to his initials and badge number being present in the body camera footage. In the bottom right hand corner you can see a unique identifier ending in MD1956. The RPD has two ways of formatting the unique identifiers in body camera videos released to the public. The first is with a random number in which case it is useless for identifying the officer wearing it. The second is with the officer's initials and badge number following the _ character. In Drake's case the second unique identifier was used and we were able to match the badge number and initials with publicly available information about Drake. Open Oversight hosts an extensive database of RPD officers. When we searched for badge number 1956 we found a single record for an officer named Matthew D. Drake (https://ift.tt/3esrXyv). That name was also found on the RPD Open Data Portal website where it is one of six names with the initials MD (https://ift.tt/2OLNDKT). From that we are certain that the video in question was taken from the body camera of Matthew Drake. According to public records, Matthew D. Drake is a 37 year old resident of Rochester, New York. He is a registered Republican with no criminal record. According to the RPD Open Data Portal he has been with the department since 2007. #matthewdrake #mentalhealth #selfdefense #cynthiaherriottsullivan

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34457/rpd-officer-matthew-drake-did-not-have-a-taser-when-shooting-man

RPD Officer Ethan Paszko ID'd as Body Slammer of Mom with 3 Year Old

When we watched the video footage of a mother being body slammed while holding her three year old daughter's hand we recognized Rochester Police Officer Ethan Paszko right away. We had just written an article about Paszko the month before after he failed to intervene while fellow officer Alexander Lombard pepper sprayed a 9 year old girl at the direction of Officer Hannah Schneeberger, but still found the time to pick up Schneeberger's can of pepper spray and hand it to her after she dropped it (https://ift.tt/2MIfdYR). To eliminate our doubts we watched the part of the video from last month over again, compared him to the officer in the video below, and reviewed media reports that two of the officers involved in the recent body slamming of a black mother with a kid which mentioned that two of the officers involved were also involved in the pepper spraying of the 9 year old. We identified officer Dakota Vanbrederode (https://ift.tt/3by9Ox6) as the second officer on the scene and also identified him as a previously unidentified officer in the video of the 9 year old being pepper sprayed. We also did not see any other officers in the video below that were present at the pepper spraying of the 9 year old last month. When we did a Google search for Ethan Paszko we noticed that Free The People Rochester identified him as the body slammer on Instagram a few days ago (https://ift.tt/3by92Aq) probably because they recognized him from last month's footage like we did. We tried to locate Paszko's name in the video below, but he is wearing a different type of nametag than the one he wore last month, so it was difficult for us to find a frame in which it could be read, but we did notice parts of letters from his name at times, plus none of the other officers involved remotely resemble any officers from the incident with the 9 year old and this guy is a dead ringer for Ethan Paszko. Defenders of the Rochester Police Department (RPD) are quick to point out that the victim in this case ran away from officer Paszko with her daughter in her arms and ignored his commands. We are going to concede those points and assume for the purpose of our analysis that she was not cooperating with Officer Paszko. Just because someone is not cooperative or is resisting does not justify using excessive force to compel their compliance. Paszko's body camera is not a good source of information in this case because it was conveniently knocked off his body at the most critical time. Ironic since the same thing happened with Adam Bradstreet's camera while he was using force on a 9 year old last month. That could be a coincidence, but it looks more likely that either the RPD fails to attach body cams to uniforms properly on a regular basis or RPD officers conveniently knock their body cameras off their bodies when they think thy might not like what will be recorded. The best footage comes from the surveillance camera from the convenience store beginning at 1:23:45. The footage begins with Paszko struggling with the woman while the child keeps trying to get close to her mother. Paszko then slams the woman on the ground and the child runs to her before grabbing her hand. Officer Vanbrederode arrives on the scene, grabs the child, and tries to hold her back from her mother. Then the mother managed to get off the ground and grab her daughter's hand. At that point Paszko grabbed her and slammed her on the ground while she was holding her daughter's hand. That action was most disturbing because the child was lucky not to be taken to the ground with her mother. Officer Vanbrederode managed to hold onto the child so the worst that happened was a brief tug of war before the mother was forced to let go. Officer Paszko's actions showed a deliberate indifference for the well being of the child. A grown man does not need to body slam a mother that is holding the hand of a three year old child twice just to arrest her. In addition to the body slamming it also seems that Officer Paszko pepper sprayed her. We could not locate the exact time when this pepper spraying occurred, but we do believe that it happened for two reasons. The first reason is that she complains about being pepper sprayed several times and at one point is allowed to rinse out her eyes at a drinking fountain. The second reason is that at 38:50 Officer Vanbrederode complaints to her that he too was pepper sprayed by Paszko, "when he sprayed you, my head was like right next to yours." Since Paszko and Vanbrederode were the only two officers on the scene when the struggle took place it does not take long to figure out that when Vanbrederode said "he" that "he" was Paszko. Interim Police Chief Cynthia Herriott-Sullivan has repeatedly refused requests to place Officer Paszko on leave. Instead she has restricted him to "administrative duty. For a cop being restricted to a desk is the next best thing to a paid vacation. An internal investigation is also pending. According to pubic records, Ethan B. Paszko is a 25 year old resident of Scottsville, New York, a suburb of Rochester. He is originally from Churchville, another suburb of Rochester. He is a registered Republican with no criminal record. According to GovSalaries he made $75,626 as a patrol officer last year (https://ift.tt/2N4PeuM). He listed himself on LinkedIn as a former student at Grove City College who was an intern with the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF). #ethanpaszko #dakotavanbrederode #pepperspray #childendangerment

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34456/rpd-officer-ethan-paszko-idd-as-body-slammer-of-mom-with-3-year-old

Jason Hess Identified Trying to Comfort Child Whose Mom was Assaulted

The Rochester Police Department recently released footage taken form the body camera of Officer Dakota Jason Hess. That footage is embedded in the video below and begins at 53:45. In the bottom right hand corner you can see a unique identifier ending in JH1774. The RPD has two ways of formatting the unique identifiers in body camera videos released to the public. The first is with a random number in which case it is useless for the public when it comes to identifying the officer wearing it. The second is with the officer's initials and badge number following the _ character. In Hess' case the second unique identifier was used and we were able to match the badge number and initials with publicly available information about Hess. Open Oversight hosts an extensive database of RPD officers. When we searched for badge number 1774 we found a single record for an officer named Jason J. Hess (https://ift.tt/3rBy0nP). That name was also found on the RPD Open Data Portal website where it is one of nine officers with the initials JH (https://ift.tt/3chWjRv). From that we are certain that the video in question was taken from the body camera of Jason Hess. Officer Hess did not arrive on the scene until after the mother had been body slammed and pepper sprayed. His video is not long and he spends most of it trying to comfort the child. At one point he started reading her a children's book, but that may have done more harm than good. We could see that kid having a PTSD attack the next time some guy trying to act like a fatherly figure tried to read her a story, but depending on that guy's proclivities that might be a good thing and she will scream like a kid is supposed to when a stranger tries to establish a relationship with them like that. Other than that we can't find anything that he may have done wrong because he was not present in time to do anything about the woman being assaulted. #jasonhess #pepperspray #assault

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34455/jason-hess-identified-trying-to-comfort-child-whose-mom-was-assaulted

RPD Officer Dakota Vanbrederode ID'd at Scene of Body Slammed Mom

The Rochester Police Department recently released footage taken form the body camera of Officer Dakota Vanbrederode. That footage is embedded in the video below and begins at 13:31. In the bottom right hand corner you can see a unique identifier ending in DV2585. The RPD has two ways of formatting the unique identifiers in body camera videos released to the public. The first is with a random number in which case it is useless for the public when it comes to identifying the officer wearing it. The second is with the officer's initials and badge number following the _ character. In Vanbrederode's case the second unique identifier was used and we were able to match the badge number and initials with publicly available information about Vanbrederode. Open Oversight hosts an extensive database of RPD officers. When we searched for badge number 2585 we found a single record for an officer named Dakota J. Vanbrederode (https://ift.tt/3erOMlD). That name was also found on the RPD Open Data Portal website where it is the only name with the initials DV (https://ift.tt/38tIpdU). We are also certain that Vanbrederode was on the scene because as the screenshot taken from another officer's camera at 57:40 clearly shows the name D. J. Vanbrederode on an officer's uniform at the scene. From that we are certain that the video in question was taken from the body camera of Dakota Vanbrederode. In this next section we will critique Vanbrederode's conduct once we are finished identifying as many other officers as we can. So far we can tell you that he was not the officer that body slammed the mother because she was already on the ground when he arrived at the scene. He was however there when she was pepper sprayed by another officer and can be heard at about 38:50 complaining to her about being pepper sprayed as well after taking her to jail. #dakotavanbrederode #assault #pepperspray

source https://copblaster.com/blast/34454/rpd-officer-dakota-vanbrederode-idd-at-scene-of-body-slammed-mom